this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
24 points (96.2% liked)

Asklemmy

55089 readers
262 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

I shattered my humerus (upper arm bone) badly, and needed major surgery, so I was in bad pain for a while, exacerbated by the fact that I'm a big whiney baby.

I absolutely refused any opiates for pain, knowing I'd get hooked, so I stuck with massive does of Advil, which worked okay. When I was near the end, almost out of it, I discovered that doctors were often recommending a combo of 1 Tylenol and 2 Advil for pain, claiming that the pain-killing power approached the level of an opiate, without any chance of addiction. I tried it, and the result was AMAZING! It really worked well. I wish I'd known about it when I first came out of surgery, instead of weeks later, when the pain had subsided for the most part.

Also, the Advil is processed by the kidneys, and the Tylenol is processed by the liver, so none of your organs are overtaxed. It's still not a good idea for those who are taking blood thinners.

I've also noticed that Advil now sells their own combo with acetaminophen.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 2 points 27 minutes ago

...It's still not a good idea for those who are taking blood thinners.

Can confirm. Every time I go in to get my INR checked, I am always asked if I have taken any tylenol products. I don't fully remember why it's not a good idea, but I wanna say it might increase blood thickness, which increases potential for a blood clot. And I don't need to explain why that is a bad thing.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

Good one. We also use NSAIDs (doesn’t have to be Advil/ibuprofen specifically) & Tylenol (AKA acetaminophen/paracetamol) in combination when needed.

It’s worth noting that Excedrin is a combination of aspirin (an NSAID), acetaminophen, and caffeine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspirin/paracetamol/caffeine

[–] mike_wooskey@lemmy.thewooskeys.com 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That was really difficult to read/understand. I added punctuation to make it more clear, at least to me.

What is one of those "Oh my god, I wish someone had explained THIS system to me when I was younger" moments, that really sticks out to you from your experience?

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yes. This is exactly the question. Glad you stretched.

[–] Reyali@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Not sure what you mean by “system,” so I’m just going to answer a thing I wish someone explained to me much earlier.

Not everyone feels hunger cues, so “just eat when you’re hungry” can be bad advice.

I learned about anorexia nervosa as an eating disorder in middle and high school. People worried about me because I was thin and didn’t eat a lot, but I didn’t try to stay skinny and I ate when I was hungry, so I knew I didn’t have that. Ironically, learning about EDs made me sure I didn’t have a problem.

In college I took a class that defined anorexia as “a lack of appetite,” identifying it could be a drug side effect, from stress, or just how someone’s body is. It differentiated “anorexia” from “anorexia nervosa.” That opened my eyes that I did have disordered eating, but it was from physiology, not psychology.

I trained myself how to eat enough, but I still have to be careful not to fall back into old habits since I don’t have normal hunger cues. It’s constant work that might have been easier if I started building these habits from a younger age.

[–] greatwhitebuffalo41@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

Yeah mine is a medication side effect so that's been fun to navigate. But honestly I find it better than my previous issue of eating constantly all the time and feeling like I had no control over it. Turns out I was dopamine seeking. Ugh ADHD lol.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 13 hours ago

I am definitely one of those people who follows the "only eat when you're hungry, and only until you aren't hungry" plan, and it's helped me lose over 100 pounds, while literally eating anything I want (in moderation), so I'm a believer.

We tend to dismiss underweight as a high-class problem that can be easily solved with a sandwich, but your perspective is a reminder to not be flippant. I still think it is sound advice for MOST people, but you have definitely made me aware of exceptions, and to be sensitive about it.

You're slender, so I doubt I'd be offering the advice to you anyway. Not that I'm going around pitching it to random fat folks I see on the street, that would be weird, and an entirely different problem.

[–] whom_corvids_inform@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The vast majority of advice you will ever hear about anything is medicinal - it's contextual to a specific set of circumstances, and is meant to deal with a certain problem or a particular type of situation. Most advice is not applicable universally, even if it is sometimes good advice.

Following from this, if you get someone sharing a piece of advice, consider if that advice suits your circumstances before following it. People have different lives, and not everything everyone tells you will be helpful advice for every situation. Like medicine.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Marxists would agree that few things apply universally, and they always consider the context, or “material conditions.” When liberals say Marxists are dogmatic, they’re showing their ignorance.

*It is quite wrong to take a formalist attitude and blindly carry out directives without discussing and examining them in the light of actual conditions […].*

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can just go to the TA's office hours for free homework help.

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

YES!! And even the prof has office hours.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am most definitely suffering from one of these that I still haven't figured out yet. probably financial shit which is the most boring thing in the whole universe to me.

[–] greatwhitebuffalo41@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

I wont lie, a good budget saved my ass. That being said, not enough income can't be fixed by a budget but it might help you find where you can trim your finances.

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes. Me too.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can HEAR music by LISTENING to it and trying to imitate it.

Sheet music is as much a trap as a tool.