364
submitted 10 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

The judge overseeing former President Donald Trump’s Jan. 6 case has reinstated the gag order she imposed following a stay.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 55 points 10 months ago

Why was it ever dropped to begin with? That shithead’s mouth should be wired shut permanently.

[-] Kepabar@startrek.website 16 points 10 months ago

Wasn't.

It was put on hold while both sides argued for and against it.

The prosecutor won the argument and the hold was removed.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 42 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

However, details of Chutkan’s ruling were not immediately available due to an outage of the court’s system that makes filings and rulings available to the public. [From Politico]

Which means that we don't yet know if she also modified his conditions of release or modified the scope of the gag order.

[-] Dressedlikeapenguin@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Good point. What's the over/under that it stricter?

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 44 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

CNN is reporting that the information comes as a brief entry in a docket between 6:30 PM and 7:00 PM on a Sunday.

The timing indicates that there's a "sense of urgency" about it, possibly to get it on the record before the Trump family takes the stand all week in New York, where you know there's going to be hallway commentary multiple times a day.

Stricter? I don't think it's likely that the scope of Chutkan's gag order will change. It's possible that the scope will be more specifically clarified. The real question is whether Chutkan will modify Trump's conditions of release to include this gag order. That should happen, so that when he violates it, the law states that his pre-trial release is terminated.

Note that I said "the law says" and not "he will go to detention pending trial." Because no matter what anyone says, he will never see any real consequences for anything he ever does.

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Yes, but i don't like hearing my lotto odds either. Let me dream of a fair justice system.

[-] Dressedlikeapenguin@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I fear you are right. Though the original Teflon Don got his eventually.

Gotti died of throat cancer on June 10, 2002, at the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social -4 points 10 months ago

Pick the appropriate line from here.

[-] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Uh, your link is recursive?

[-] Nougat@kbin.social -4 points 10 months ago

Should lead you to my profile page, where I list the things that I find myself having to repeat:

  • If the punishment is a fine, it's only illegal for poor people.
  • American Fascist Party
  • We call people what they want to be called.
  • I decline to answer any questions without an attorney present, and I do not consent to any search.
  • Seize the means of production.
  • Some of those who work forces are the same that burn crosses.
[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

When did this over/under thing become popular in Lemmy? It's the second time I see it this week.

[-] bitwolf@lemmy.one 4 points 10 months ago

First time seeing it for me. Do you know how to interpret it?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

it's a gambling term.

For example with sports. Somebody sets a predicted score for a particular match, and then you place a bet if it's over or under that.

[-] charles@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

As mentioned by another poster, it's a gambling term. But when someone asks "what's the over/under on...", you're kind of asking "what's the number where there's a 50% chance of it being either higher or lower."

With that said, it doesn't really make sense in this context, imo. They could have just used "chance"

[-] Dressedlikeapenguin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure why I used it, I don't even know if I've used it in a real conversation. Felt good in the moment I guess? Maybe it was the memory of his failed casino that inspired me?

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

Lock him up!

[-] Bridger@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

Over/under on how long until she throws his fat ass in jail?

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Who’s going to change his diaper if he’s in jail? Who’s going to smuggle his makeup and hairspray?

[-] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

She'll confiscate all of his Halloween candy when he violates the order.

Judge Chutkan means business, you see.

At least she's not just completely spiking the case like Judge Cannon. Pretty amazing how the whole nuclear-secrets-on-the-shitter story just sank into irrelevance when it became clear he was going to skate on it.

[-] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

We've been sucking down the hopium like a Hollywood starlet at a snow party...

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

And we're also gonna end up fucked and abandoned on a couch...

[-] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's an odd way to spell "murdered" and "left in a ditch".

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
364 points (97.6% liked)

News

22855 readers
4928 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS