this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
51 points (94.7% liked)

PC Gaming

11524 readers
235 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If they are too cheap to pay original artists, why should one pay the original developer to play?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So they don’t have to replace even more with AI

[–] HerbalGamer@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

we ddin't start replacing

[–] EherVielleicht@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Up vote but the boob (to our right) looks kinda weird.

[–] EherVielleicht@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

can we have normal sized version? also a bit more variety for the face type/angle make up and expression.(and lighting should be better cause it uses out-door background.) How many per batch you generate and pick the better ones from them? During my brief research of prompting and trying to posing the result, it's really hit and miss.(even for the "hit" one you probably still need to hand tweak them to make them look nicer.)

I haven't played around with the newer iterations, kinda dropped it and waiting for direct-ml to become more mature. It's a useful iteration tool for me though to generate texture patterns then pipe to program that make them tileable.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Whose AI system are they using, and what did they pay for it? A lot of them do have clauses prohibiting commercial use of generated images

[–] glad_cat 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s called signing a contract and paying something. It’s used a lot nowadays.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Plenty of orgs get caught when they don't even pay for the the software on their computers. I wouldn't be at all surprised to find that the same entities not willing to pay a person to make artwork try to skip out on paying a business to generate it

[–] Pyroglyph@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's entirely possible they used Stable Diffusion locally, which means anything goes as long as it's legal and is not harmful to any individuals.

[–] baconisaveg@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

which means anything goes

Not really... sure you can run a1111/comfy locally but you'd still be bound by the terms of the Checkpoint finetunes and any LoRa's you've used, and a lot of those are really sketchy about listing their sources.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Ah so the artwork isnt copyrightable and anyone can use it.