this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
63 points (87.1% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

31017 readers
1 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world/

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations 💗

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As this #RedditBlackout accelerates the Fediverse experiment, I feel the urge... the need... to chime in with my 2-cents.

My summary of the current lay of the land: Beehaw saw a wave of pornography spam and decided to shut Lemmy.world off and Defederate from this server. I'm too new to this community to fully understand the wants/needs of each individual server, but I've been around the internet long enough to recognize that porn-spam is an age-old trolling technique and will occur again in the future. Especially as small, boutique, hobbyist servers pop up and online drama/rivalries increase, online harassment campaigns (like coordinated porn spam attacks) are simply an inevitability.

Lemmy.world wants open registrations. Beehaw does not: Beehaw wants users to be verified before posting. This is normal: many old /r/subreddits would simply shadowban all 1-year old accounts and earlier... giving the illusion that everything is well for 5+ or 10+ year old accounts, but cut out on the vast majority of spam accounts with short lives. This works for Reddit where you have a huge number of long-lived accounts, but its still not a perfect technique: you can pay poor people in 3rd world countries to create accounts, post on them for a year, and the these now verified accounts can be paid for by spammers to invade various subreddits.

I digress. My main point is that many subreddits, and now Lemmy-instances/communities, want a "trusted user". Akin to the 1+-year-old account on Reddit. Its not a perfect solution by any means, but accounts that have some "weight" to them, that have passed even a crude time-based selection process, are far easier to manage for small moderation teams.

We don't have the benefit of time however, so how do we quickly build trust on the Fediverse? It seems impossible to solve this problem on lemmy.world and Beehaw.org alone. At least, not with our current toolset.

A 3rd Server appears: ImNotAnAsshole.net

But lets add the 3rd server, which I'll hypothetically name "ImNotAnAsshole.net", or INAA.net for short.

INAA.net would be an instance that focuses on building a userbase that follows a large set of different instances recruiting needs. This has the following benefits.

  1. Decentralization -- Beehaw.org is famously only run by 4 administrators on their spare time. They cannot verify hundreds of thousands of new users who appear due to #RedditBlackout. INAA.net would allow another team to focus on the verification problem.

  2. Access to both lemmy.world and Beehaw.org with one login -- As long as INAA.net remains in the good graces of other servers (aka: assuming their user filtering model works), any user who registers on INAA.net will be able to access both lemmy.world and Beehaw.org with one login.

  3. Custom Moderation tools -- INAA.net could add additional features independently of the core github.com/LemmyNet programming team and experiment. It is their own instance afterall.

Because of #2, users would be encouraged to join INAA.net, especially if they want access to Beehaw.org. Lemmy.world can remain how it is, low-moderation / less curated users and communities (which is a more appropriate staging grounds for #RedditBlackout refugees). Beehaw.org works with the INAA.net team on the proper rules for INAA.net to federate with Beehaw.org and everyone's happy.

Or is it? I am new to the Fediverse and have missed out on Mastodon.social drama. Hopefully older members of this community can chime in with where my logic has gone awry.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rosatherad@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Isn't the whole point of the fediverse to have different instances with different rules and cultures, and them all having the freedom to associate with (or to not associate with) whichever other instances they choose? Boohoo, an instance is using their freedoms in a way you aren't! Don't get so upset over what Beehaw chooses to do. People who agree with Beehaw will hang out there more and people who don't will move elsewhere. This is the natural way of things, isn't it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AyyLMAO@exploding-heads.com 0 points 2 years ago (16 children)

You're basically describing how the fediverse works I think.

How is it different than the current situation where both lemmy.world and beehaw.org are connect to lemmy.ml?

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] upbeatoffbeat@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (13 children)

So we got defederated? I guess that explains the massive decline of activity here. It’s really not selling the fediverse for me if you can suddenly be cut off from the rest of the world just like that.

[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You've got it the other way around - Beehaw is defederating themselves from all the major instances, because they can't enforce a safe space like they want to at any kind of scale on this Fediverse model. Lemmy.world is about twice the size of Beehaw in number of users.

https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/list

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That user is from sh.itjust.works, which is a 2nd server that Beehaw also Defederated from.

[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah, just saw that. Either way, I completely understand Beehaw's goal but don't understand how they think it's going to work in the long run.

[–] JohannesOliver@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

In the long run they are hoping for more flexibility. I think it is incorrect that they are separating from “all the major instances” but they are separating from (two) servers with open account creation. I personally think an instance admin should be informed when their users are being banned from other instances, so they have the option to review behavior and consider if they would like to do the same. Sh.itjust.works at least has instance rules that should be compatible with most of what beehaw doesn’t like.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You're correct in the old world / Reddit way of doing things. But I'm not sure if that's how it "should" be done here on Fediverse.

Even on Reddit, the mechanism of just shadowbanning young accounts is cruel. Especially as a "secret rule", it basically cut off Reddit from the younger generation. Its why Reddit tilts to millenials, because we weren't banned yet in 2008 when we made our accounts, while all accounts in 2019+ are basically shadowbanned by default. This obviously can't work either for Reddit and is probably the reason they're in decline.

The fact that we have new solutions available to us here, in the Fediverse, thanks to 3rd party servers and new server instances, is something to be celebrated.

[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I guess I should clarify - I don't understand how Beehaw thinks their approach is going to work at scale, because any bad actors (trolls, bigots, racists, etc.) they're trying to prevent can simply create new accounts on Beehaw and cause the same troubles directly on their server. Sure they'll have marginally more control over those accounts, but nothing is stopping people unless they put "I AM A RAGING BIGOT" in their user application.

In the meantime they'll only be preventing reasonable people who use other login servers from participating in Beehaw communities. In my mind, that's only going to lead to more bad actors focusing on Beehaw and less general population from the Fediverse to drown them out.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The process is self-selecting, is it not?

I don't think its much of a surprise that a ton of troll-behavior came from an instance called sh.itjust.works. People who find explitives funny and want to associate with that are a different cut from folks who just wanna hang out and casually talk.

[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (17 children)

I mean, you can't really classify everyone from that server just because it has bad words as part of the domain name. It's likely that it's getting as many new users as it is simply because it doesn't require an approval process, which is something that many new Lemmy users probably find offputting when trying to sign up for the other servers.

Also I'm not sure how any of that invalidates anything I've said. I can appreciate their goal, but I see it rapidly meeting with the reality that all they're going to accomplish in the long run is to isolate themselves inside of an echo chamber that will be constantly harassed by the same people they sought to keep out, without the rest of the Fedi/Lemmy-verse to combat it by drowning out the assholes.

(edit) - In short, people who want to harass, will. And will come to your server to do it if they really want to. If you cut yourself off from the rest of everyone else, all you're doing is cutting yourself off... from everyone else.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sping 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Only from beehaw.org, right? I'm still seeing this from sdf.org.

Am I misunderstanding or does this not just mean you'll have to choose your registered instance to match your needs, and if some instances you like are too widely considered problematic to access from a broadly useful instance you may have to have another identity there.

Somewhere like beehaw.org appears to be an instance that's likely to exclude fairly aggressively, so that's a consideration for whether you want that to be your home.

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You have it all exactly right.

Beehaw has a code of conduct that's relatively strict. People who sign up on Beehaw do so because they are looking for a more controlled atmosphere.

They've been trying to host a dinner party, and the college kids on spring break keep trying to crash it. So, they just closed their door. This isn't a problem. This is how freedom of association just works.

People clutch pearls over defederation every time a major instance gets defederated. It's always the same thing, too: "Why am I even here if I can't see everything??" But you can't see everything from Reddit -- it doesn't federate with Tumblr, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram... And you can't see averything from any of the other centralized social media sites for the same reason.

They're all defederated from each other.

It's only a problem here because people conflate the websites they're using with the server software used to run them, and then feel entitled to direct access to anyone and anything using that software. Which... Is a mood, I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AyyLMAO@exploding-heads.com 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't see how one out of 160+ servers not connecting to sh.itjust.works would cut you out from the rest of the world.

I think of it more like being cut off from 1/160th of the fediverse. Unfortunate, but in the end a type of community I don't think I'll miss since our values don't align.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] jgrim@discuss.online 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

There’s a bunch of other instances. Like mine at discuss.online. Nothing new is needed.

Seems like you’re just suggesting everyone use beehaw with federated accounts.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Oh there's plenty that's needed.

The vast majority of users here are from #RedditBlackout and their eyes glaze over at that discussion point. They don't know what a "federated account" is.

What's needed is education? Community organization? Etc. etc. People are new to Lemmy and Fediverse. People are trying to figure out what the plan is. A lot of users are already feeling "betrayed" that they "chose the wrong server" when they registered here at lemmy.world.

[–] jgrim@discuss.online 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The platform just needs to mature a bit. It’s new and discovered in desperation. It’s free and not monetized. Everyone is working in their free time to build something wonderful.

The Mlem team went from 2 people to 20. They’re about to drop a huge update to their beta app.

The lemmy team worked on front end improvements in the upcoming 0.18 front end.

I have a beta instance setup if anyone wants to see it.

Don’t feel betrayed. Have two accountants. Move to a new instance. Or just wait for them to federate again when the dust settles.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kichae@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

A lot of users are already feeling "betrayed" that they "chose the wrong server" when they registered here at lemmy.world.

Many of those same users have been calling Beehaw admins snowflake dictators since before the block. These are people who want their cake and want to eat it, too. They want to not have to abide by Beehaw's rules, but also have unfettered access to Beehaw. That's not a tenable position.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FantasticFox@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You are just describing joining any one of the dozens on instances that aren't defederated from Beehaw or Lemmy.world - your INAA.net already exists in the form of all those instances which Beehaw didn't defederate from.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

But which of those servers are personal vanity projects, and which servers are explicitly going to try to stay on the good terms of even fragile communities like Beehaw.org?

Server instances need to be clear about their intentions. If randomserver.org gets defederated from Beehaw.org, do they help the Beehaw.org team at moderating themselves? Or do they say "Whatever" and not try to help out?

This isn't clear. Servers, at least today, are still in the "Don't care who you sign up for" phase, which is naive and obviously wrong already.

[–] nivenkos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

But what is the magical ability to achieve step 2? How do you filter and moderate users reliably at scale?

The fundamental issue is that Beehaw wants to eat their cake and have it too. They want their users to be able to read and comment on other instances, but not have to mirror their content, pay for image hosting, etc. or allow other instances' users access to Beehaw's content.

They want the benefits of federation without giving anything in return.

[–] thisn@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong but that's not how it works. Beehaw users can't read and comment on other instances, that Beehaw defederated with.

[–] nivenkos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Indeed, but this was their request for the future. Mastodon has a similar option as instance-wide "silencing"/limiting - https://docs.joinmastodon.org/admin/moderation/#limit-server

Go and read their comments, they're pretty open about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kichae@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They want their users to be able to read and comment on other instances, but not have to mirror their content, pay for image hosting, etc. or allow other instances' users access to Beehaw's content.

This is a totally disingenuous take.

Defederating works both ways. Defederating from another instances also means that Beehaw users can't access content from that defederated site. And, in fact, that's exactly the purpose of defederating. They access remote content by having it imported locally, and what's being imported doesn't adhere to their site's guidelines.

They're not "having their cake and eating it, too". They're saying "this cake that keeps showing up on our table is full of turds, and so we're just not accepting outside cake deliveries anymore".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

I listed Reddit's "secret rule" amongst long-term moderators and subreddit communities. Just straight up ban accounts that are younger than a certain age. That's already going to grossly clamp down on porn-spam and troll accounts, because it means that the trolls need to either buy a pre-made account, or the trolls have to wait a week with good behavior before engaging in troll activity.

EDIT: Is that enough for Beehaw.org? I don't know. But lets say INAA.net is just a time-delay. All accounts less than 1-week are only allowed to post to lemmy.world. All accounts older than that are unlocked to talk with Beehaw.org.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They will just block that too. Let them be. They want to play in their own little sandbox.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ulu_mulu@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

My much simpler stance is: they don't want lemmy.world users on their instance, I'll respect that, I unsubbed from their communities and found the same elsewhere.

They're not the only Lemmy servers in the world, Lemmy is still new overall, I don't see any problem in "rebuilding" the 2 big subs they have somewhere else, I'm already putting my effort in contributing to make it so.

edit: typo

[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think one thing that hasn't been mentioned here is the huge gap in the size of the communities. The largest beehaw communities have almost 20k subscribers while the largest I've seen from other instances seem to cap out at about 5k. I think the problem is that most of the users who still federate with beehaw will undoubtedly end up there. This presents serious difficulties for growing competing communities.

[–] Frostwolf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Beehaw’s limited registration will turn off many users and eventually instances with open registration will catch up.

[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

This comment is a month old so you will be happy to know that you are right. That is what happened.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I actually thought about starting my own server with very strict user verification, but I don't really have hosting capacity other than a personal server with like... One 9 of uptime. Nor do I care to change that.

But I think there would be serious draw with a user base that was guaranteed to be a real person, like through phone or face picture verification. Not everyone would go for it because not everyone wants to trust a random with that kind of information, but it worked on some subreddits like /r/fatfire for guaranteed proof of wealth. Think of it like having a public Facebook or Twitter account. Nothing stops you from having a bunch of anonymous alts, but certain servers might only want people from that vetted list. I'd certainly do it. If someone else wants to physically host the server, I'd be happy to vet people. But who would trust me?

[–] BaldProphet@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Is one 9 of uptime 9% or 90%? lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Wander@yiffit.net 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

With Lemmy there's actually a use case for user-only instances, which host no communities. Moderating well is tough and it makes sense to prevent brigading.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Senseibu@feddit.uk 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It’s a great idea, but how do you propose verification on the INAA.net site? Using their current instance account details and seeing how many upvotes their comments and posts have received or something? Essentially developing a Karma tracking system that’s seperate to Lemmy.

Like you say a staging post, but then account elevation which allows it on more sensitive instances? I don’t know how we could guide new users to these staging instances though, unless every popular instance, where most content is created, draws up the bridges together and makes them read-only to the staging instances.

If beehaw didn’t want to get involved, it’s up to them, but I can see other instances who would want to use the service. Tbh the beehaw admins do sound like they a tad powermad so screw them anyway.

Lemmy needs a governing body, based on a democratic election system, to handle all this in all in sync between all instance admins. That body would also be in control of the master blocklists.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don’t know how we could guide new users to these staging instances though

Read-only access to Beehaw.org, but with a message "Beehaw.org has a user-treaty with INAA.net. Only users older than 1-week can post to Beehaw.org instances"

I admit that these features don't exist yet. But why not? Lets first come up with the idea and try to figure out what is easiest to code.

[–] Senseibu@feddit.uk 0 points 2 years ago

If it was natively part of the Lemmy project, the problem is I don’t know rust. Python yeah but never even attempted rust myself.

We need buy in from all admins of the most popular instances with a central authority in place managing it all. It can be done, I’d put my name down to assist but it’s a learning curve for me but sounds really fun and something to add to my CV

[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (10 children)

I mentioned this in a different comment, but you'd need to do legit identity verification. "Send me a picture of your face and 4 fingers" since AI can't do fingers well, or a blanked out picture of your driver's license. It would be extremely mod intensive to get set up, but it would entirely prevent bots. Sure you'd still get assholes, but banning someone whose actual identity is tied to their account is way more damaging and would get you slightly better behavior.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›