67
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nusm@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Maybe it’s that giant migrant caravan that kept heading our way from Mexico every 2 years during election cycles. Fox “News” would show video and claim they were coming to cross the border to steal your jobs, molest your kids, and kick your dogs. After the elections, the caravan mysteriously disappeared.

Seriously, I saw it again last year for the third time, and I wondered, “How many times are Republicans gonna fall for this?!”

[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Seriously, I saw it again last year for the third time, and I wondered, “How many times are Republicans gonna fall for this?!”

It's very easy for a lot of people to fall for the most obvious lies in the world when they want those lies to be true

[-] Spaceman2901@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Conservative interest in the invasion clause fell off during the Trump administration, then revived after Joe Biden’s inauguration.

Shocking. They’ll say anything to win an election and then there’ll be nothing but crickets afterwards.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"Invasion" rhetoric inspired the El Paso shooter. People who call refugees invaders do so because they like racist violence.

[-] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The dude who kept trying to illegally human traffic people across the united states out of Florida is also the same dude trying to stir people up about border control.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is a complicated topic that I think most don’t consider. They’re not exactly lying. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/11/09/whats-happening-at-the-u-s-mexico-border-in-7-charts/ The fact is, more people are coming, not caravans though. Be prepared for more because Climate refugees are going to strain resources in those areas. At some point in the future, we’re going to have decide where the limit to our compassion is. America’s track record is not great.

[-] Boddhisatva@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Immigrants coming to the country to request asylum is in no way an invasion by any literal usage of the term. Further, no state is in "imminent Danger as will not admit of delay." DeSantis is just playing this up to drum up support of racists. Frankly, I wish people in the USA would realize that this nation was built on immigration. Every person in this country who is not 100% Native American is descended from immigrants and I'd wager that includes every single person in that town hall.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I agree with everything you’ve said. I’m trying to raise concerns about climate change and the refugees that will follow. I want open borders, but that may not be feasible in the near future.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
67 points (94.7% liked)

politics

18992 readers
2689 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS