this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
396 points (100.0% liked)

World News

23683 readers
60 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnowboardBum@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Very on brand for them. Especially after they denied free school lunch in North Dakota and turned around a week or so later and raised their daily meal allowance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pocahontas@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

that's a weird priority to have... even weirder to be so proud to announce it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LordGloom@vlemmy.net 1 points 2 years ago

Meanwhile, they literally get free lunch. It's some ridiculous stipend over $100 a day. Tax corporations and the 1%, no never. Starving children though, excellent idea. Can't get kick backs from a single parent who's struggling. Plus we can use the money we saved to give Uvalde another armored vehicle. That'll help the children. We are truly screwed.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Pro-life, pro-child, pro-family values 👍🤗💖💯

[–] harbinger@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Gosh... Just imagine that not guaranteeing a meal to children, preventing them from eating in some cases, is what you want more than anything.

Simply blows my mind.

[–] nzodd@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

These people jerk off to the idea of hurting children. Every new policy Republicans come up with, whether its supporting ~~child marriage~~ legalized rape with 12 year olds or trying to bring back child labor, or making children too hungry to learn anything in school, makes their "moral" panic over a bunch of people who happen to be wearing dresses reading to kids even more hypocritical. Honestly I think it's the idea of children being functionally literate that probably terrifies them the most.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago (11 children)

what they fail to understand is that for poorer communities, kids rely on these lunches for meals when their families can't afford to buy food

[–] hamster@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

I think they understand, and they take pleasure in it.

[–] bdiddy@lemmy.one 0 points 2 years ago

"those deadbeat parents should've got an abortion if they can't feed their kid" --republicans probably

[–] cowvin@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The Republican party serves the rich. Poor Republican voters are just temporarily embarrassed millionaires so they are cool with suffering themselves as long as other poor people are suffering. Other people deserve to suffer because of skin color, religion, "laziness", or whatever, so they keep voting to cut services for themselves.

[–] nzodd@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

I'd argue that they understand it perfectly. The cruelty is the point.

[–] Hyacathusarullistad@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Something something bootstraps.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Plume@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Tearing down women's rights. Ruining queer people's life, especially trans people. Making sure children can't eat for free. Wow. Quite the priorities over at the Republican party.

I'm not American, I've just been looking from afar for a long time now. But from everything I'm seeing... it feels like they're going to be in for quite the rude awakening in 2024.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themobyone@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

I'm just sad for the US now. Hope you guys will get better times soon.

These are the same people who can expense up to $79 per day for food and drink. They're fine taking hand outs, they just don't want you to have any.

[–] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'll say it again and again and again: If you assume Republicans to be foreign agents tasked with destroying the US economy, bankrupting its government, ruining its international image and killing as many Americans as possible, their actions make perfect sense.

[–] Osayidan@social.vmdk.ca 0 points 2 years ago

There's probably some of that, in some cases there may even be overwhelming evidence of it.

Overall they're just a bunch of greedy self-centred fools who will drive a steam roller down a street filled with babies and kittens if it means their stocks will go up by 0.01$.

So Republicans don't love America? Yeah, that tracks.

[–] nzodd@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

1 million Americans are dead because of disastrous Republican-lead mishandling of covid. Some have even labeled it as a literal genocide against our countrymen.

And yet, there is some evidence to suggest that the Trump administration did in fact intend to use COVID-19 to target certain political and racial groups. According to reporting from Vanity Fair, Trump’s son-in-law and advisor Jared Kushner shelved a federal COVID-19 testing plan because he believed that the virus would mostly affect Democratic states, and the administration could then blame Democratic governors for deaths. Blue Democratic cities are disproportionately home to Black people and other minority populations. A federal plan to allow deaths in blue states inevitably and predictably disproportionately facilitated the deaths of Black people and other people of color.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Always think about the children, except when it's something that directly impacts the lives of children.

[–] Spitfire@pawb.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Profits are priority over children being able to eat, right? Makes sense to me! /s

This is just plain cruel. But I think they know that.

For a lot of kids, especially those whose families struggle financially, the free school meal is what they have to eat that day, and this would take even that away.

Horrible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nzodd@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

Attention conservatives: you can't ~~marry~~ legally rape children or force them into child labor if you already starved them to death first.

[–] negativenull@negativenull.com 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What happened to states rights? Wasn't that the rationale of getting rid of RoweVWade? Oh yeah, that was another lie. Of course it was.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (35 children)

The fact that its been so normalized to be this openly shitty and callous toward frigging children... i dont even know how to react to this any more.

Im not saying its hopeless, but I feel like a lot of people on the "lets not let children go hungry" side of the fence are almost left speechless by these idiots. But i feel like thats almost part of their strategy - stunning the opposition. There has to be a better response.

What's the best way to respond to this kind of brazen cruelty? (Besides voting and campaigning for candidates who arent sociopathic).

[–] polygon@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Listen, this is hard thing for me to type but I think is relevant to the Republican mindset. Hundreds of children are being murdered in their classrooms. Literal murder. Of children. This is not enough to sway Republicans on gun control. If actual murder of 6 year olds doesn't have any effect on them, surely 6 year olds being hungry is not even going to make them blink. This is the reality with these people. They simply do not care about you, or your children, and everything they do is governed only by money and power.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
[–] lyam23@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

It's really quite shocking how the GOP agenda can be predicted by asking yourself, "What's the worst thing someone would in a given situation?". What's even more shocking is that they have engineered the political framework to disproportionately grant them enough power to sometimes pass these regressive policies. But for most of America, sigh, just another Thursday...

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“It’s not enough that I should eat, children should starve. “ -the gop.

[–] TechyDad@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Either that or "I don't believe that anyone is starving. I just ate a large lunch so obviously nobody is going hungry."

They only recognize that something is real when it affects them personally. If it doesn't then they'll either claim the thing doesn't exist or will say it's that person's fault that they are going through that (likely for being "too lazy" to pull themselves up by their bootstraps).

[–] nzodd@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

“I don’t believe that anyone is starving. I just ate a large lunch so obviously nobody is going hungry.”

Exactly. Same energy as "I made a snowball in January so obviously global warming doesn't exist and neither does the sun by the way." Weaponized incompetence at the object permanence level.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fuck your kids, billionaires need yet another tax break. -Republicans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] miroppb@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • cut Social Security and Medicare
  • make Trump’s tax cuts for the top 1 percent permanent
  • impose work requirements on “all federal benefit programs,” like food stamps and Medicare
  • extend work requirements on those aged 55–64
  • bring back all of twice-impeached and twice-arrested former President Donald Trump’s deregulations, including the weakening of environmental protection.

Well then

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anthoniix@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago
[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Using public funds to help people? Not on the GOP's watch.

[–] dan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Absolutely ridiculous and cruel. But not surprising for Republicans Their mindset of "I got mine, screw everybody else" is so terrible.

[–] stephfinitely@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Pure cruelty. Our taxes ment to be used to help people and this means more then paving roads (which in the US isn't done). I'm sick of this idea the government needs to cut spending but then they just cut social programs that is the whole point of having a government.....

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] KnittingTrekker@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am not American... But I have to say, this sounds just so comically evil it seems something only a badly written cartoon villain would say, like "I will kick all puppies and banish chocolate"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Calcharger@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Of all the things to rally people around…

Children should not have to bring money to school to eat. A nutritious and tasty meal should be provided free. Their only worries in school should be whether they studied enough to pass an exam, not on their grumbling stomachs. This is dystopian garbage.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›