541
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 88 points 10 months ago

U.S. vehicle fuel efficiency standards administered by NHTSA have encouraged automakers to build larger vehicles. The bigger the vehicle, the lower the fuel efficiency target it has to meet.

That's some monkeys paw type of shit law

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Yeah preverse incentives. When doing the wrong thing makes the most sense for the individual. Happens often in tragedy of the commons situations.

If you hit a pedestrian it is better for you that they die. If you find an endangered animal on your land it is better for you to kill it. If you have a child with someone who makes minimum wage it is better for you to divorce.

Maybe it is too much to expect but for things like this, when public policy experts came up with a standard instead of just inheriting a situation, that they plan for these things in advance. Spend a few moments and look at where the incentives are before just hammering a new policy into place.

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If you hit a pedestrian it is better for you that they die

Uh maybe in China. I would not say that in the United States. Manslaughter is a serious charge.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

You aren't factoring in civil suits. Someone dead, their family can only get so much. Someone crippled can just keep going after you and might have to as they go into greater and greater levels of debt. What would you do if suddenly your income went down to about 14k USD a year and with each passing day the chances of you returning to work diminished, wouldn't you be desperate enough to try to win some money from the person who did this to you? Wouldn't you go along with any shyster lawyer who promised results?

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Wait until you hear how exhaust fumes shrink your penis

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

That's Regulatory Capture. Laws made by and for the industry they're supposed to regulate.

[-] Windshear@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

Recently bought a new diesel silverado 3500 for my ranch. It's enormous, I'm glad I didn't get the dually option as it's hard enough to drive in the city. Most of its job however is pulling trailers around.

That said, on highway if I drive the speed limit and take it easy I can get 9L/100km. It's unreal that such a huge truck will get almost the same economy as our KIA SUV.

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I didn't think that sounded right so I looked it up; Chevrolet themselves say it's between 11 and 12 litres/100km

I don't know what Kia you have, but their diesel Sorento SUV averages 6-7 litres/100km, nearly half what your tiny-penis truck uses

Funny also that people pull trailers in every country in the world using much smaller trucks without a problem

You don't need that truck, same way as nobody else on the planet, no matter what their profession, needs it

[-] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 10 months ago

You don’t need that truck, same way as nobody else on the planet, no matter what their profession, needs it

Please stop this bullshit. There are most certainly reasons to own a truck that can haul big things. Including in Europe. It's just that 90% of the trucks you see in a Costco parking lot don't need to be that way.

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I do occasionally see tiny-penis trucks here in Europe. Do you know what I've never, ever seen though? A dirty one. One used for work, rather than just showing off.

If you had to haul something heavy on a trailer, what would you use? A fuel-guzzling, heavy, unreliable shiny trinket, or a Toyota Hilux?

99% of workers with stuff to move use a van. Farmers use pickups like L200s. Accountants drive tiny-penis trucks for the tax break

Explain to me again why American contractors are the only contractors on the entire planet that need giant trucks?

[-] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago

What do those farmers use to move livestock around? Because you're generally looking at a 10,000lbs trailer for that, which is F450 territory.

What you really want to go after is the lower end the truck market. Circa 2002, the Ford Ranger had a curb weight around 3,300 lbs (exact number depending on the trim) and looked like this. The current one is around 4,200 lbs and looks like this. Small trucks have disappeared entirely in the US market, and there's no good reason for it.

But when you start hitting the Ford Superduty market (F250 on up), you're looking at people who actually use their trucks for the most part. They are big because they haul a lot of stuff and they have to be.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Evilschnuff@feddit.de 43 points 10 months ago
[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

big thing smash more than small thing, news at 11

[-] SYLOH@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

The US public has repeatedly demonstrated that it would rather die than make even minor adjustments in their lives. So don't expect anything to get done.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 14 points 10 months ago

Smaller cars? Over my dead body! Literally.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I have been thinking about getting some "Child Killer" stickers to start slapping on trucks that are particularly unsafe and huge. I don't get why in neighborhoods that in all kinds of other ways frowns upon putting kids at risk (no driving fast for example) dumbass men are allowed to own MASSIVE trucks that raise the risk of running a child over by a huge amount and no one shames them.

Time to start shaming these people more.

[-] alienanimals@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Go for it! The cost would be pretty inexpensive.

*Edit It's funny how the downvoters aren't okay with a simple sticker, but are okay with two ton vehicles killing more people than usual.

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

How much could a vandalism charge cost Michael? $10?

[-] alienanimals@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Less than a vehicular manslaughter charge.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 10 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 18 points 10 months ago
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Additional_Prune@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

I have a small truck, and its A pillar has blocked my view of pedestrians more than once. I have to move my head to check. With big vehicles, I imagine there's even more of a problem.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I ran over my friend in high school while driving a Ford Ranger. She is 5'1 but still, if her hands hadn't flopped up in the air I might've killed her. Worst part is, I'd just dropped her off.

Always need to be careful driving a big vehicle. Learned that the hard way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

youdontsay.png

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

next they’re going to try to tell me tanks are more deadly than four door sedans. does anybody buy this stuff?

[-] r0bi@infosec.pub 8 points 10 months ago

I miss pop up headlights

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I read that as "Tall trucks, SUVs are 45% deadlier to US presidents, study shows", and was like: how did they do that study?

[-] Mr_nutter_butter@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

These flat fronted high up ones have made their way to Europe how are they legal

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Maybe it's how they are designed. I've sat in a number of them that have ugly blind spots. Back left is a big problem on a lot of them.

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I've responded to a bunch of "car vs pedestrian" calls. With adults a low speed hit is usually some minor injuries like lower legs, arms, etc. If they're hit hard sometimes their head hits the windshield. The victim ends up on top of the hood and rolls off the side or up and over the car.

If it's a truck their injuries are more serious. Hip, rib, shoulder/arm, spine, and head injuries. They get hit high and knocked into the ground -- and sometimes partially or completely run over.

[-] Pipoca@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Yes, it is.

Big cars are heavier, taller, and have larger blind spots. The first two make them deadlier in an accident, the last makes it easier to run someone over in a crosswalk, parking lot or driveway.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
541 points (98.4% liked)

News

22831 readers
4128 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS