this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
56 points (72.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

35273 readers
978 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Don't drink fant drinks when you drive!

Fanta: 😟

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ethanol@pawb.social 44 points 2 years ago (4 children)

According to wiktionary infant comes from the Latin word infans, meaning "unable to speak". The term fans means "to speak".

Not sure if your Fanta can speak though :P

[–] 6daemonbag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago

Which is why we have "infantry." Soldiers who don't speak and follow orders

[–] Gilles_D@feddit.de 15 points 2 years ago (4 children)

As a side note here, Fanta was derived from the German word „Fantasie“. I don’t think it needs translating.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 years ago

Side note on the side note: Fanta was invented in nazi Germany because they couldn't import all the ingredients for Cola

[–] z500@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

🇬🇧 fantasy
🇮🇹 fantasia
🇫🇷 fantaisie
🇨🇿 fantazie
🇸🇰 fantazia
🇷🇺 фантазия
🇩🇪 FANTASIE

[–] Gilles_D@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago
[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Ah yes, a reference to the thousand year dream /s

[–] LolaCat@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So it wouldn’t be technically wrong to refer to mute people as infants right? /s

[–] SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Probably falls into the same or similar category as calling them dumb, ones open a time an acceptable word to call them, but not really today. You know unless you are looking to insult them for being mute.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Right. The term that would probably fit the context would be "infantile", which again has negative connotations.

English has a long history of descriptors of intellectual deficiencies becoming contemporary insults then terms to be avoided because of that insensitive use, then the use continuing until everyone's kinda desensitized to it but now it can't be used in the original context.

See also: idiot, imbecile, moron, etc.

Currently going through that process: "retarded".

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Happens in most languages.

Also, many languages have a link between deafness and lacking intelligence, e.g. dumb meaning "not able to speak" and "not intelligent".

In general, being sensitive to people with disabilities (both physical and mental) is a rather young concept, hence anything that would make someone not be able to be part of society is often also an insult.

That's also why e.g. terms linked deafness/muteness are often an insult to someone's intelligence, while e.g. terms linked to blindness are not. Blind people might be unable to perform some things seeing people are able to, but blindness doesn't necessarily limit someone's ability to be part of a society unaccomodating to people with disabilities.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Might change your thoughts on blindness as an insult by attending a sporting event where a ref or ump makes a questionable call...but broadly speaking, I think your comment is definitely a worthwhile contribution.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

We're fans, yo!

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Jesse what the fuck are you talking about?

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

You mean, what am I fanting about?

[–] pao@feddit.de 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If infancy is childhood, is adulthood fancy?

[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It sure as shit doesn't feel fancy

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Try it again, but with your pinky out.

[–] AnarchistsForDemocracy@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And what does that say about Infantry?

[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It says that it's cheaper than adultry.

[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Also better for your marriage

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

Both of those are below elefants

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Looks like it means unable + to speak. As in “This human is so young he can’t talk yet.”

https://www.etymonline.com/word/infant

[–] Hack3900@lemy.lol 5 points 2 years ago

If your drink is talking you should already not be driving

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The in is not a prefix here. That's just how the word is spelled.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago

Actually, it is.

It derives from Latin infans where "in-" is a negation prefix and "fans" is the present participle form of "for", which translates to "to speak".

So an infant is a non-speaker (too small to speak).

But my opener was of course a joke, where I purpously misunderstood what "fant" is derived of, by claiming that "fant" must be the opposite of a child, thus an adult.

There are tons of Latin words in the English language and many of them only survived in English in their compounded form (e.g. "in-fant", where no other version of the actual verb in there survived, except the negated form).

Often the parts of these Latin root words have no meaning at all anymore in English, so that people don't notice that they are actually using compound words and also the original meaning of the word is forgotten.

Not a lot of people would associate "infant" with "hearing".