BassedWarrior

joined 3 months ago
[–] BassedWarrior@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Oh no...

I'm honestly pretty worried about people flying around the place on their own. It makes it so much easier to mess up, I believe, and way more dangerous than what cars currently are.

Hope they are reeeeally careful with how, or if they actually roll these out, because it could be such a nightmare...

And as always, fuck cars, and long live pedestrianization and public transit. It is technologicalny impressive, though, and the autopilot could be a lot better. But still...gives me the ick

[–] BassedWarrior@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I really liked this. It kind of reminds me a bit of the last few chapters of Jason Hickel's How Degrowth Will Save The World. Where he talks about the intelligence of trees precisely, and the relationship indigenous tribes have with nature being a lot more like coexistance rather than exploitation. Nice read.

[–] BassedWarrior@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Now you have to get Matrix as well

[–] BassedWarrior@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I love it, and I find it super funny, yes. And I do agree with some of you that they end up portraying Ostania more like nazism than the USSR, per se, imo.

But I do agree thta the show is very Orwellian, and wish it wasn't. But I still find it too funny, honestly.

And given that we don't really know what is up in Westalia, I'd say that honestly Ostania doesn't look like USSR to me, and much more like Germany, as I mentioned before. Also the red circus guys being anti-Ostania kinda aligns with that interpretation, in my mind.

(I haven't finished it. I'm all caught up watching the anime on Crunchyroll, but idk if it's already finished.)

But I'd recommend it for a good laugh.

[–] BassedWarrior@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I don't know if this counts as non-theory, but I've been reading Marx at The Arcade, recently, and I've found it fun. Analysis of the gaming industry.

[–] BassedWarrior@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

GenZedong is the only one that comes to mind, but itt's not really book specific.

(Just pitcing in. No clue if that's what the other guy was referring to)

[–] BassedWarrior@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't know how related it is to your question or topic, but I'm currently reading a book called Marx at the Arcade, and perhaps you would find it related to your chaos. Specially because it deals with the production or games, and also the nature of play, with a Marxist perspective.

Edit: I also made a post about an article I read, which also gives a summary of the book and is what convinced me to buy it.

(But that is more related to gamers, perhaps)

[–] BassedWarrior@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Nobel (Dynamite) prizes being just a tool for political gain part...something something. Great for the guy for standing up against the empire.

[–] BassedWarrior@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man, this is so infuriating. Hope south America gets its shit together soon so we can form a coherent geopolitical block and form a united front.

[–] BassedWarrior@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I don't get this. Why is that the reason that the proeect may be destroyed?

[–] BassedWarrior@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hahahahaha, that sounds about right.

I didn't know about his affinity for chess. Even better

Edit: So...I bought the book, and...right there...it says something very similar.

We know, of course, that Marx had nothing to say of videogames, given they did not exist at the time (though he was a chess player, and there is even a record of a game he played after he finished writing Capital).

 

Okay, so I'm not sure if this is the place to post this, of it should be on Freechat or some other place, but being a gamer who has lately been somewhat conflicted between the need to

touch grassAs alluded to by the guys at TheDeprogram Podcast on their episode titled Touch Grass
, which ironically means just have fun playing videogames, and not just focusing on being a socialist 24/7 and all the things one is missing by not reading enough theory, or not organizing, or not working, or blablablablabla...

But I'd always love to see some sort of marxist analysis of programming, and software, and ofc...videogames! And so this is just an article by Jacobin Magazine, which summarizes the contents of the book

(which I've not read)But looks intresting given what the article says
Marx at the Arcade.

And I thought it would be the perfect thing to share here in Lemmygrad. Hope I'm not mistaken posting this here.

[–] BassedWarrior@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Bolivia with Evo?

And I guess you're right, regarding the dire situation in south America.

I'd of course just hope that enough traction can be gained from international unity for a multipolar world alongside BRICS, or something new from south America. As to at least avoid the domestic armed struggle.

 

This is a linked reading from the anticapitalist software license website, which I posted before on this same community.

Thought it would be an intresting read to share here as well.

TL;DR: About the failure of the FOSS movement and it getting turned into just OSS.

 

TL;DR: it's a copyright license that forbids any non-worker-owned company from using it.

Full License Text

 ANTI-CAPITALIST SOFTWARE LICENSE (v 1.4)

Copyright © [year] [copyright holders]

This is anti-capitalist software, released for free use by individuals and organizations that do not operate by capitalist principles.

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person or organization (the "User") obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to use, copy, modify, merge, distribute, and/or sell copies of the Software, subject to the following conditions:

1. The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or modified versions of the Software.

2. The User is one of the following:
a. An individual person, laboring for themselves
b. A non-profit organization
c. An educational institution
d. An organization that seeks shared profit for all of its members, and allows non-members to set the cost of their labor

3. If the User is an organization with owners, then all owners are workers and all workers are owners with equal equity and/or equal vote.

4. If the User is an organization, then the User is not law enforcement or military, or working for or under either.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.

So I've made some posts recently asking about the various difrerent licensing and development philosophies we could apply as socialist software developers, and have now found this license.

It is listed on GNU's list of incompatible licenses as a non-free license, since it limits what the software can be used for, and who can use it, which goes against freedom 0.

And I found it intresting enough to share. As

an alternative(To the fairly common (Lemmy, for example) use of the GPL 3 License or the AGPL 3 License by socialist software)
for us socialists to clearly state our political views through our licensing.

The biggest drawback I can think of when using this license is that it limits the flexibility for comrades who are better suited with a different legal enterprise structure, while still working as a cooperative in practice.

But let me know any thoughts you tay have on this. I just thought it was intresting enough to share and keep the discussion going.

Further readingThere are also some links for further reading at the bottom of the web page I might share at some other time as their own posts.

 

I have found it not so simple to be able to find socialist literature regarding software and software development, and I was wondering if you had any recommendations for myself, and anyone who may find this post in the future. (And if there's an already existing post which details various sources on the matter, that would also be appreciated).

But I mostly wanted to know if there's any literature or any analysis on FOSS, and if that's the best alternative we have currently under capitalism. Because I see a lot of socialist software is usually developed utilizing strong copyleft licenses such as GPL 3.0 (or later) or AGPL 3.0 (or later) (Lemmy, for example).

And I already made another post regarding the ProleWiki page on FOSS, where I asked about the possibility of including further information in order to make it easier for fellow comrades to learn more about the topic, from a socialist perspective, and not just cling to FOSS for freedom's sake.

And maybe the possibilty of including some information regarding the views on self-hosting as a way of providing better information security for comrades, as well as include links to resources such as Codeberg for code-hosting, over GitHub, which is owned by Microsoft.

 

I don't know if there's a post asking about this already, but what happened to the whole Common Software concept?

I found this webpage for the RTC:

https://comrades.sbs/

which I think is what the article on FOSS is referring to.

But I see that the pages for Common Software and Revolutionary Technical Commitee have been deleted.

Does the License still exist? What happened to the RTC? And can I find more information anywhere?

Because now it just feels like a tease, but with no link to learn more. And I've wanted to find a better alternative to FOSS for my software.

Thank you so much for the wiki. I love it and would love to keep reading it.

view more: next ›