RidderSport

Streisand-Effekt und so

Affe ist wie alle Tiervergleiche eine sog. Formalbeleidigung, die erstmal keine Meinung ist. Aber die Machtkritik kann man sicherlich argumentieren, dafür darf man halt den Strafbefehl nicht akzeptieren, sondern muss vir Gericht gehen.

Strafbefehle gehen schnell. Das wurde wahrscheinlich einem Referendar auf den Tisch gelegt, der hat schnell nen Strafbefehl draus gebastelt ans Amtsgericht geschickt, der Richter hat das unterschrieben und der Angeklagte hats akzeptiert. Passiert bei Bagatellsachen ganz häufig.

Wenn du das Geld hast im Zweifel die Geldstrafe zu tragen und am besten eine Rechtsschutzversicherung für den Instanzenzug, dann würde ich sagen, dass du Chancen hast das dies trotz Formalbeleidigung (->Tierbezeichnung) mit der Begründung auch einfach als verkürzte Meinungsäußerung durchgeht. Bonuspunkte gibt es wenn du nen Sing schreibst oder das als Bild verkörperst

Why is he still studying at 30? Really not a productive member of society /s

You see, that's being said all the time as a counter-argument. But it has been proven to be untrue. First of all, there are exit taxes in most countries, the USA is pretty gung-ho on that for example. Also, the rich are also just people, that have families and friends. They won't move just because they pay a bit more in taxes. People are lazy and like the environment they're used to. Bonus if they have kids that don't want to leave their friends behind. Lastly, where to move to? Many of the EU countries are the countries with the best living conditions world wide. Granted some of the criteria like accessibility and affordability don't apply to the rich, but freedom of speech, general freedom, state of infrastructure, crime etc. mostly apply to them as well. And there are very few countries in the world that can match. Those that do are also expensive and or far away or have other issues.

I am born 99 and have never heard the song on radio. And while I love the early 2000 pop-rock/pop-punk stuff, I only got to know the song 2021. So for me it is still a banger. Though I really like the Killer's first album anyway

You can tax their existing wealth. For example an annual tax for the average wealth you held for the past year for people whose wealth exceeds a total 250 million in all assets

We can't even get Germany to pool for a 60 euro ticket for Germany, how do you expect that to work on a european scale. Besides public transport varies a lot in Europe including the price. And Germany is not even close to the worst on that list. Crete for example has a bus system - without an official time table. You basically just guess if there's even a bus coming and locals do the same. And even if one comes, it might just be full, with the next allegedly coming in another hour - or earlier - or later, nobody knows.

Air pumps will become the norm in Germany in a few years to phase out gas heating in private homes. Some also use it for cooling in summer. Although the one family I know that has it cools a water tank that is circulated in the ceilings of the house to cool it down without wind or noise

AFAIK flying a tiny but long ass flag is normal in Denmark. You are however only allowed to fly a Danish, Norwegian, Swedish or German flag.

In Germany it is forbidden to fly a German flag with the state emblem (yellow shield with black eagle) as that is the official German flag and may only be flown by federal goverment entities.

Also flying the wrong flag or the right one incorrectly on a boat or ship im Germany can get you fined up to 10k€

It has no constructual theory underlining it. It does evolve, but only when lawyers and judges are open to progressive change.

The same applies to codified law in theory. However law science takes much more room. Scholars argue in all directions and publush their oppinions. Law makers and hugh courts use those as well as fundamental changes in public oppinion to shape laws or write them from the ground up. And codified law does know precedent, it is rarely completely binding though. Lower courts may present differing oppinions and divert from precedent.

It also gives the people a much better access to law. You can just easily read up upon it. In fact penal law for one is written purposefully so that everyone should be able to understand it.

Also juries? In what world does one think having 20 something random people decide whether someones guilty?