Generally the more layers you add to an SSD the less robust it is. If this is real your data will be corrupt within a week.
I doubt they'd bother to make fake people, it's probably easier to find a single real swivel eyed loon from each constituency than invent them.
The cryo companies can't easily go bust, one of the reason it costs so much is they purchase a perpetuity to cover the cost forever.
I looked into doing it myself, it's not out of reach for normal people if you pay for it using life insurance.
I'm not sure there's another term for "sold well" that doesn't also imply people liked it.
Alternatively they could just be calling them plebeian.
I'm still using the same model M I bought about 15 years ago
Only for the IOT version which is for devices like ATMs, but it kinda torpedoes their argument that a TPM is hard requirement for windows 11.
The hitperson is the only competent employee left at Boeing.
In general, if it passed peer review it shouldn't matter how it was written.
The fact the blatant examples apparently made it past peer review show how shoddy the process is though.
That's never really been an issue with HDDs as far as I'm aware, although 10k rpm drives were known to be more fragile IIRC. The lower life and robustness of QLC vs SLC flash is well known.