Sludgeyy

joined 2 years ago
[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Counting to 100 is like learning to read. Yes both are basic tools needed to learn English or math.

Do I need to know that the Ming Dynasty ruled from 1368 to 1644? Is anything about the Ming Dynasty relevant to my life? I cannot remember the other handful of dynasties so I guess the Ming Dynasty could be the only one needed to function.

Yes history is important and definitely worth telling people. But having them memorize stuff that you can look up in a textbook is dumb.

I could walk into any high school level history class and pass the test if it was open book and if I had enough time I'd probably find all the answers.

Anyone couldn't walk into a Calculus class and pass the test with it being open book if they didn't know how to do Calculus. Yes they could read the whole chapter and learn to do it then pass the test. But there's no looking up the answers in the book. It's not memorizing.

We know this is necessary because of cultures that are missing whole concepts like particular colors. The idea of right and left. So on.

Cultures are not missing whole concepts like particular colors or left and right. They just express it differently.

Light red is pink. But a light blue is still light blue, maybe baby blue or sky blue.

Russia has the word голубой for light blue. It's equivalent to our pink. Are we missing the whole concept of light голубой? No.

The cultures understand them being a different color and even more so they understand how it's a mix or part of a color group. Being able to point and say "orange" when equal red and yellow are mixed isn't a necessary skill. Like what would you say if something was a mixture of equal parts green and yellow? You could say chartreuse. If you didn't know that word are you really missing out on everything chartreuse?

The right and left thing I think you're referring to the tribe that uses cardinal directions? Thinking in terms of cardinal directions instead of left or right is a bit bizarre and I don't know exactly how deep it goes. Like if i wanted to tell you to hang the picture to the right of the fireplace, I would have to know the cardinal directions of your house? Cardinal directions are extremely useful to use in English. East side wall of your house tells you exactly what wall it is. Left or right doesn't mean anything unless I say something like "facing your house". If I knew your fireplace was on your north wall I could easily say "Hang the picture east of your fireplace" meaning hang it to the right.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They do have a point. School should be about learning and developing critical thinking skills rather than memorizing who the 30th president was.

I know my schooling had a ton of memorization. Funny to think about now that I know I have Aphantasia because I always excelled in math and science because they are less about memorization and more about learning a concept to apply.

They need to teach kids how to use AI. It's like people that won't let you use a calculator in math. "You aren't always going to have a calculator in your pocket"

I've always been a big supporter of open book/note tests

There is no reason I should be able to recite as much of the Canterbury Tales as I can.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do normal people really argue with themselves?

I have aphantasia, no visual mind images, and was thinking about the cartoon representation of the devil and angel battling on the character's shoulders.

I learned counting sheep meant actually watching sheep in their mind. Could it be like that?

I'm debating if I have an interal monologe. I can "speak" words in my head.

But I wrote this comment without planning and just wrote it down as it came to me saying each word in my inner voice as I typed it.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Aardvark

A a rd v-a-r-k

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

"If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate" Zap Brannigan

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

160k extra. You have what you're going to normally retire with plus this 160k.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

"Allow her to retire comfortably"

The debatable part is if they meant immediately retire. Which 5 figures will not let you do. But will it allow her to retire eventually comfortably?

10 year US bond is 4.2%

Let's say she is 30.

Retirement age is 67. So 37 years until retirement.

6,000€ ×5 is ~$35,000

$35,000 at 4.2% interest for 37 years is $160,388.66 (This isn't taking into consideration reinvesting the 4.2% interest after 10 years, but also ignoring things like taxes)

But getting $160k when you retire would allow a lot of people to retire comfortably.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

They get turned into red light when going into pokeball. They get stored as red light. No need for tubes to store ball.

Since the masterball exists that must mean you keep the masterball on you always and just pull the pokemon out with any connected PC.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Draft Dodgers by Escape from the Zoo

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll be the first to admit that I don't fully understand hypnosis.

I don't really dream that much. I normally fall asleep and then just wake up. I've had dreams before and I can't say that I saw images or not. I want to say that I did see images because I would describe them as being very vivid and real like almost like I was experiencing it rather than just thinking. But when I wake up I cannot recall any of the images but know how the things in the dream looked and would recall them like I saw something in the real world.

But if my muscles are relaxed how is that supposed to put my brain in a relaxed state?

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It means "no imagination", but the truth is we've plenty of imagination, just not visually.

It's not a coincidence that the word image is in the word imagination. Most people image to imagine.

We have learned you don't need to image to imagine. If you would have asked me awhile ago if I saw images in my head I would have said yes because I can hold details of an image in my head and "see" it. It's like I'm imagining an image to imagine.

Just like I can imagine what would happen if you placed a ball at the top of a hill and let go. I don't need to see images or a video to "imagine" the ball is going to roll down the hill.

Phantasia is a word used by Aristotle to describe "mental images". What is thought of as "imagining". He described it as a mind's eye.

Imagining is the term that is wrongly named. It could be used for only processing thinking with images but like you said you "imagine". I have aphantasia and I'm just "thinking" about the ball and it rolling down the hill, not imaging it doing it in my head.

view more: next ›