[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 4 hours ago

Nuking a place, especially a desert will create lots of glass from the heat. So "glassing" a place is slang for nuking it, or just bombing it so hard nothing remains.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 19 hours ago

That echoes the peace terms that Zelensky and Putin’s representatives discussed in Minsk, Antalya and Istanbul in March and April 2022. Those talks ultimately failed because the Kremlin team refused to budge on key additional demands such as limiting Ukraine’s armed forces and rewriting laws on language rights.

Well, it seems the Russians have gotten their demand of limiting Ukraine's armed forces either way. So the first one was at least in retrospect, not a bad compromise. As for the second one, what exactly are those details, would you like to elaborate, Mr. Matthews? Is the reason that you aren't elaborating that the Russians were against the reduction of minority language rights, as admitted even by an Atlantic Council article?

But in many – in fact most –important ways, Zelensky is a victor. Four fifths of Ukraine will emerge independent of Russian dominion

Independent of healthy prime aged males as well

free to rebuild itself as a prosperous European democracy

Yeah cause the "prosperous European democracies" are doing so well themselves, right? How many European leaders have an approval rating above 30%? How many are neoliberal hellhole police states, Owen?

If Ukraine is very lucky, it may find another leader of Zelensky’s strength and calibre.

With luck like this, Ukraine won't need enemies.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 1 day ago

I love how both managing crypto and ai are lumped into one position despite them being completely different things.

Seems like trump is just throwing away the people he doesn't give a shit about like someone might gather all their trash in one place.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 day ago

ver since the GFC, the average American's level of sympathy for the rich and elite has been degraded significantly. That's in fact kind of Trump's whole role in preserving bourgeois rule. Redirecting the anger of as many Americans as possible towards reactionary ends.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Well, funding so many wars is partially why the Biden admin lost the popular vote and election in the first place. Nothing too surprising here.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 days ago

When this thing goes to zero, and it will, because that’s its intrinsic value

That's not exactly how the labour theory of value works. Most big crypto currencies are either tied to some currency, or require massive computational resources to produce. This means that the value of the labor embodied in the electricity and GPUs is transfered over to the crypto.

Crypto fluctuates a lot more than normal currencies does because it is way more influenced by supply and demand than normal currencies (regulated by governments) are.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 days ago

There are 2 trillion dollars in Bitcoin right now lol. That’s more than the US GDP

US GDP is above 20 trillion.

Besides, the American economy will be fine. A lot of investors will loose their money, and the media will frame a crypto crash as catastrophic for America because they believe that investors are the economy.

But the average person will only be affected if a crypto crash triggers a broader recession. Though such a recession would have happened with or without crypto anyway, because periodic recessions are the normal operation of capitalist economy.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 3 days ago

Currently Chinese companies reinvest about 5% of their profits into R&D, which is a fourth what Western firms do.

That appears to me as strikingly low. Maybe this is why Xi has made such a strong focus towards increasing innovation.

China has an enormous services sector, but only a third of that is aimed at producers. In Western countries, it’s almost half. Western countries have key advantages here—advertising, marketing, banking, insurance, international settlements.

A huge reason why that sector is so much bigger in the west is probably because of the rentier and monopoly status of insurers and bankers. And also what exactly is "international settlements"?

When you do business with Chinese factories, the difference in cost for these business services is stark. For example, the difference between using a freight forwarder in Singapore or New York or London, compared to using the one which is recommended by the Chinese factory, is thousands of dollars on a single container. And if a buyer uses a Letter of Credit issued by a US bank, instead of one in Hong Kong—the difference there is hundreds of dollars, and it takes a lot longer.

I'll be honest. I don't exactly understand what is being said here? Like the phrasing is confusing.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 4 days ago

The government is keen to trumpet its deportation credentials with figures published on Thursday revealing 8,308 enforced and voluntary returns between July and September 2024, a 16% increase on the same period last year.

The only times western "leftists" prove themselves to not be powerless is when they are using their power to be ghouls.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 5 days ago

American reaction summarised in 1 picture

63

Belarus has almost half as many maternal deaths per live birth as the country just 2 spots below. What kind of Juche Necromancy are they using?

37
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml to c/dredge_tank@hexbear.net

And no, you were not "yelling about this for months", except at the tankie boogiemen. The whole of the Democrat voterbase was completely against Biden dropping out or pressuring the Democrats to adopt a left-wing program. There was negligible pushback to anything the Dems did even by the so called progressives.

115
69

Despite no longer identifying with liberalism, I still make liberal mistakes. I have caught myself multiple times at this point saying that China is not doing this or that to help Cuba, or Palestine, or to combat some domestic issue. Then I do some digging and it turns out they are actually doing something.

As an example, I thought that China was abandoning Cuba with its energy crisis, but they are actually building solar plants. There are still problems, since the plants will take time to open, and still only provide a fraction of the energy Cuba needs, but this is just one project. I am sure there are more things going on behind the scenes which I just haven't seen yet, because they aren't flashy enough to make it to the front page of the news.

Basically, what I am saying is that I spoke first and investigated latter. This is because I was being lazy. I just want to remind everybody to not repeat my mistakes.

54
43

Just a quick shower thought (I am literally typing this in the shower)

I think it might hit closer to home, because the insult (accusing someone of being loyal to the empire) is less abstract than insulting someone for having an unscientific world-view. Another benefit is that it makes us seem less like conservatives, and is harder to coopt by patsocs.

Obviously, the insult will probably only become effective if it spreads so that people know what is being referred to. And obviously, liberalism is still a menace.

What do you guys think?

14
Jojo part 9 sucks (lemmygrad.ml)

I was originally skeptical when they introduced genocide Joe as the new jojo (name doesn't even make sense, how is GEJO the same as JOJO) because I thought that an 80 year old man wouldn't be relatable or entertaining.

Turns out, that's the least of his problems.

99

Mfs seem to have forgotten that Chinese GDP PPP is already higher than the US

61

Don't know if I am preaching to the choir, but with how much libs try to use the trolley problem to support their favorite war criminal, it got me thinking just how cringe utilitarianism is.

Whatever utilitarianism may be in theory, in practice, it just trains people to think like bureaucrats who belive themselves to be impartial observers of society (not true), holding power over the lives of others for the sake of the common good. It's imo a perfect distillation of bourgeois ideology into a theory of ethics. It's a theory of ethics from the pov of a statesman or a capitalist. Only those groups of people have the power and information necessary to actually act in a meaningfully utilitarian manner.

It's also note worthy just how prone to creating false dichotomies and ignoring historical context utilitarians are. Although this might just be the result of the trolley problem being so popular.

8

I don't know how the fuck this shit started, but I've started to see more and more comparisons between Biden and Lincoln amongst libs for the purposes of vote shaming.

Like these mfs apparently don't realise that Lincoln sided with the abolitionists (in the end) while Biden would be a slave owner in their own analogy!

25

I always find it funny just how stark the differences between us propaganda about China, and the government's own documents is. Like they know that liberals will never bother reading, so they can make documents praising the CPCs ambitious strategies and decentralised government.

24

The election discourse has become cancerous because it keeps going in circles. This is because liberals have become fixated on the narrative of there being some large bloc of leftists who are going around trying to convince people to not vote. However, this contingent, does not actually exist? Most of the people I have seen take a stance against voting for Biden aren't telling other people to not vote. Some are, but the number of these people is so vanishingly small (compared to the rest of the electorate) that it becomes clear that the election discourse is entirely a waste of time.

Liberals are also really trying hard to convince these people to vote (by berating them online), and it just seems like this is the most idiotic and time wasting strategy possible. These people have negative charisma.

Even if they actually could actually speak persuasively, wouldn't it be far better to target the large number of non-voting centrists/apathetic people rather than leftists who have taken a principled stance (and thus could only be convinced if you knew more about American and world history, which liberals are blissfully unaware of)?

For as much as liberals are fond of accusing leftists of being impotents on a moral high horse, the election memers aren't accomplishing anything either.

view more: next ›

Sodium_nitride

joined 1 year ago