SpaceDogs

joined 3 years ago
[–] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Scare the veterans but what about my dogs 😔

[–] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 10 months ago

Oh my god this comment just made me remember that Timothy fucking Snyder actually moved here after Trump was elected. Apparently he now works at Toronto university.

[–] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There’s something deeply rotten with this fucking country. I hate living here.

[–] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 11 months ago

I did the exact same thing with “space,” “dog,” “student,” and “Chronic” lol. I am glad I seem to not feature at all on there, unless I missed something critical.

[–] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 11 months ago

Are they really writing that many? Now I’m a little worried lol

[–] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 11 months ago

He made a video about the Ukraine and Russia war and it’s was not good.

[–] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 11 months ago (4 children)

She’s been doing advertisements that have really catered to incels but her most recent one was talking about “good genes” in an American eagle ad campaign. A lot of people have been talking about its eugenic undertones (overtones?).

[–] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I honestly don’t understand why the ACP/MAGA communists don’t consider baristas proletariat. Were the coffee makers in the USSR not part of the working class? I know it’s to do with some flavour of queerphobia, and because they hate queer people then that must mean they are bourgeoisie. I don’t know how these people can call themselves communists when they don’t even know it’s most basic concepts.

[–] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You can ban people but I think our comrade was too busy talking to and debating other chatters to pay attention to this person. He never actually acknowledged this MAGA guy in the first place.

[–] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It was weird because he does consider the proletariat but only when they fit a certain aesthetic. Queer folks and/or those that do not fit into the stereotype of the typical American blue collar worker are suddenly not part of the revolutionary class. It is just disheartening to hear as a queer communist (no blue hair but I used to dye it pink!).

[–] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 11 months ago

It was actually so infuriating, I am somewhat glad that the comrade who was streaming probably didn’t notice. A lot of terrible people were in that chat and they were lucky that TikTok has a character limit because I would’ve gone a lot harder.

[–] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 11 months ago

The only other movies about Unit 731 that I know of are Men Behind the Sun and Philosophy of a Knife, so its good we are getting more about it from China, especially since I am pretty sure the guy who made Men Behind the Sun is also anti-communist.

 

I was watching a TikTok live of a fellow comrade and saw a message in the chat by “user bunch-of-numbers” that said MAGA Communism was the future.

I, stupidly, responded “no it isn’t, come on now.” I did so because I wanted to shut that shit down immediately but that only spurred him on. I should’ve known better.

He responded with “yes it is, you are a rad lib.”

Notice how he insulted me first? So in turn I responded “MAGA communism is not the future, you’re a weirdo conservative.” While I usually keep the insults in my mind and try to stay level headed, I felt comfortable matching energy because he called me a fucking radlib.

He then continued “most of the American proletariat are Trumpers and we need to reach them.”

I said “yes, the working class should be reached but not while validating their bigotries.” I believe that you have to meet people where they are at, mostly regarding education such as not using unfamiliar words or concepts, while NOT validating their hatred of minorities.

He countered “Stalin and the Red Army defeated Hitler, not blue haired multigenders.” I shit you not, this is what he said. I never specified what bigotry I was talking about since MAGA people embody them all, but he seemed to get really defensive over my statement.

I then asked “because most trumpers are incredibly racist, does that make their racism okay then?” Since he seems to be fine with homophobia and transphobia, that must mean he is okay with racism too.

He stated “most of them aren’t racist, but the ones who are of course it is not okay.”

With that I said “okay, well are blue haired multigenders not also proletariat?”

And I swear to god he said “most of them are not. Baristas are not proletariat.”

Who the fuck brought up baristas? Not me! With that I asked “what makes queer people not proletariat?”

And guess what? He stopped responding and just continued talking to others in the chat and repeating that MAGA communism was the future.

I know I should have just ignored his ass but I just couldn’t. I am the type that cannot let that shit slide, because when I do I end up feeling awful physically (achy knees for some reason) and mentally.

 

Hi comrades,

My professor emailed me today talking about how he is on tenure track and is now under review to extend his path to tenure. This is a normal process and part of it that would help the review committee is getting letters of experiences from students. He gave me a list of things that I should mention which I will when I write it (my experiences with his lectures, impact on my academics, anything specific that he helped with, etc.).

My only issue, and it’s not really an issue, is that I’ve never done anything like this before and was wondering if anyone else had had this experience and would be willing to share some tips on how to go about this. Even if you’ve never had to do an academic support letter I would still appreciate any advice.

Is there a way I should structure this? Do I address the committee? They have no official name, just the “review committee,” so should I start by saying something like “dear Review Committee”?

I was told that not writing a letter would not impact my grades or professional relationship with my professor, but I want to do it as it’s great practice for me and I want the committee to know just how great this professor is.

Thanks for your help!

 

During my summer break after completing my spring classes I decided to try to do a few activities: learning Russian, dog training, housesitting, and finally finishing Rise of the Tomb Raider. This game is the second of the survivor trilogy and it left an odd taste in my mouth.

The first of this trilogy, just called Tomb Raider, came out in 2013 and it as the first Tomb Raider game I had ever played, although I knew of the series already from the movies and just the games existing. I played it religiously on my Xbox and was practically in love with this version of Lara Croft. I was a young teen back then, and now that I am an adult I finally have my own resources to buy the rest of the survivor trilogy: Rise of the Tomb Raider and Shadow of the Tomb Raider. The reason why I am writing a post about Rise is because of its setting, plot, and tropes.

When I was sifting through the DLC I noticed an outfit called “Siberian Ranger,” this got me thinking that maybe the game would be set somewhere in Russia, obviously in Siberia. I was right. Immediately I was cautious and even a bit worried but I played through trying to keep a realistic amount of optimism that hopefully the game wouldn’t succumb to Russophobia, or god forbid any anti-Soviet sentiment if there was anything related to the USSR. Well imagine my surprise when a good chunk of the game is spent exploring and raiding old Soviet installations and even a small Gulag. I was extremely hesitant but pushed forward and once again hoped that the game would be at the very least neutral towards the Soviets. At first I thought I was right.

When I first came across the Soviet installations, a logging camp and mine, things were fairly okay. There were crests everywhere to read, increasing Russian language proficiency, and when she would read them Lara would make a comment like “Soviet propaganda,” or “more propaganda,” in which she would then read it out loud. Her tone was neutral or intrigued, but most of the crests would talk about working through nights and hunger, some even gave hope of freedom through work (sound familiar?). The only one that was fine was a crest saying “Lenin Lived, Lenin Lives, Lenin will live forever.” If you want to see what all the crests said in detail then just search up “Rise of the Tomb Raider soviet crests” and there will be a fandom wiki where it lists all of them including Lara’s comments.

With these crests and as you proceed through the Soviet areas things get worse pretty quickly. The Soviets are depicted as having been brutal invaders who treated their prisoners incredibly poorly. They would enslave innocent Natives, including women and children, entire families, for the purpose of building their railway, digging in the mines, and competing with the West. As you explore the logging camp there are sleeping areas for the prisoners in which every bed is caged in. I do not mean prison cells, I mean every bunk had caged walls, so prisoners would be essentially entombed in their bed until released to work their lives away. Again, the Natives are described as innocent, they committed no real crimes yet the Soviets imprisoned them anyway.

Not all prisoners were Natives and this is talked about in documents left by the Soviets and Natives. It builds a narrative of a growing resistance movement to overthrow the oppressive Reds, and this rebellion was successful as proven by the corpses of soviet soldiers strewn around, all skeletons in uniforms. When you enter the area with train cars and a large building you have to scale, fighting a million enemies as it burns to the ground, the entrance gate has Soviet skeletons hanging on it as a grim form of decoration or message, most likely strung up by the prisoners.

The gulag is small and not nearly as terrible as Lara narrates it as. This sounds horrible for me to say but it was mainly just a bunch of wooden buildings encased in barbed wire fence. Lara is captured by the main bad guys, Trinity, and is imprisoned there with a Native named Jacob. Lara and Jacob manage to escape together and while making their way through the gulag Jacob will narrate how his people were treated so poorly by the invading Soviets and now by Trinity, making parallels between the two. While he talks you can turn on a slide show that shows a bunch of photos taken at the gulag, in which Jacob will continue on about the horrors his people faced. They really push this idea of the Soviets being ruthless colonizers. Just like Trinity.

Trinity is a weird cult/organization that has existed since ancient times. They are hyper religious and were hunting down a prophet, an immortal man that defied the rules of their God. The Natives talked about and encountered through the game are followers of this immortal prophet. The prophet is immortal due to this thing called the Divine Source, something the Natives, also called the Remnant, will protect fiercely. The Soviets were not privy to this Divine Source until later and by that point the Remnant wiped them out. Trinity is also after the Source and Lara has to stop them. I explain Trinity’s whole deal to show who the game is comparing the Soviets to. It’s not great.

Like its predecessor, Rise has optional challenges that can be completed for EXP. Two of these challenges are called “Capture the Flag” and “Difference of Opinion.” The flag challenge has to do with the many USSR flags strewn around the installation. The point of the challenge is to cut down every Soviet flag found, this can only be done once finding the knife. The opinion challenge has to do with Soviet propaganda posters hanging up on walls everywhere, many depicting cosmonauts and Lenin. The challenge is completed by burning all the posters, this can be done with Molotov cocktails and/or fire arrows. These are just more forms of anticommunism that plague this game.

Now, why did I mention the noble savage trope in the title? Because the Remnant, also known as the Natives, somewhat embody this trope in the way they are framed against the technologically “superior” Trinity and Soviets. The Remnant themselves do not use any form of modern technology, except radios, and they do not wear modern clothes either except for Jacob, their leader. Now this is not an issue, I know people in real life subscribe to this, living without much of modern tech and that is fine. It is the way this is juxtaposed against the antagonists, people who the Soviets are compared to, where the trope becomes more evident. Not only that, but they are not specific at all. Notice how they are only called the Natives? They have no real resemblance to any native Siberian group at all.

The Remnant are confusing as well in their origins as they seem to be from Syria, but their documents and other collectibles are in Greek. The ancient Remnant collectibles are in Mongolian, but I do not recall any Remnant documents in Russian. The only real flaw to the Remnant is that they are initially hostile to Lara’s existence but rely on her heavily once she proves to be an ally against Trinity. It is odd to me how they are shown to be opposites of the Soviets, not being able to work together. They are opposing forces, an oppressor that must be defeated.

More can be somewhat learned about the relationship between the Soviets and remnant in the Baba Yaga DLC. This DLC follows three people: Nadia, her grandpa Ivan, and grandmother Serafima who is supposed to be dead, but spoiler alert grandma is actually Baba Yaga. Ivan is a ex-Soviet soldier who fell in love with one of the prisoners, Serafima, and runs away with her. That does not last as she is taken and killed by Baba Yaga. Ivan makes a vow to get vengeance and heads off to kill Baba Yaga, because he is missing Nadia asks Lara for help in finding him and defeating the witch. The game treats Baba Yaga as her mythological, supernatural form, as Lara suffers from hallucinations brought on by pollen from a flower.

You get to fight some pretty cool battles because of these drug trips. One of the fights you have to survive a bunch of spooky wolves while Baba Yaga commands the area with her walking house. A house that is revealed to just be a gondola. Long story short you find an antidote for the drug trips but are unable to take another dose before the final battle thus having to fight the witch in her floating cauldron. The witch is revealed to be Serafima, who was a researcher enslaved by the Soviets to conduct, well, research. Serafima details severe abuse dealt out by the Soviets against the prisoners, her included, and she decides to use the hallucinogenic pollen against them. She also attacks because she believed the Soviets killed her husband. Her diaries that can be found detail all of this and it was just more of the same “Soviets are evil” stuff. Nothing new from what the game has given thus far.

The game itself was fine in terms of mechanics and gameplay. It felt similar to the first but the story was lacklustre. Maybe my judgement is clouded by the anti-Soviet sentiment sewn through its narrative, but I do not seem to be the only one who felt the same. I was interested in the beginning, regarding the Syrian campaign (a brief flashback tomb raid, but it was fun) and the history of the prophet and ancient trinity, but it just got super boring once exploring the Soviet installation and the rest of the Siberian wilderness. The beginning was, again, interesting, especially that first bear fight and stealth killing trinity goons in the forest, but it just dragged on as the game continued.

The tropes were annoyingly obvious and decisions made by characters were frustrating, drawing out an already predictable story. The side-quests weren’t even that good either. What saved it for me was those beginning areas of gameplay, the mystery (at first), the tombs, exploration (in some areas), and the final boss fight. I actually dealt the final blow with a tin can. You are able to craft them into an explosive but instead of that I just threw it at the guy and he died in the most dramatic way possible. It was hilarious.

I still love Tomb Raider from a gameplay view and it has honestly inspired me to work out. I want to be able to shoot arrows, fight, and climb things like Lara. I know it is probably silly that a video game makes me want to get more active but it gives me a “tangible” goal to work towards which is something I need. I wanna be tomb raider without the raiding because that is unethical as hell. Also, as someone who is working towards becoming a Historian (I do not feel comfortable calling myself one just yet), the actual history that is found in these games, through the artifacts found, is really nice.

In conclusion, I am glad I finished this game and I look forward to Shadow of the Tomb Raider, the final instalment of the survivor trilogy.

 

I am aware that this is a silly question, it’s stupid, really.

This has to do with a provincial government, not the feds. If you know anything about disability politics in Canada then you are probably aware of the Canadian Disability Benefit that was recently rolled out. This is a federal program that is supposed to give those on provincial disability programs a $200 “top-up” on the already existing provincial cheque. The federal government did not think this decision through incredibly well, or maybe they did, because they specified that the provinces could treat this extra $200 how ever they pleased but “encouraged” that the money be exempt from any cut backs.

Because of this, my province (I do not care if I am doxing myself at this point) is slashing $200 from their own disability cheques. So instead of an extra 200, we would be getting the same amount of money before the CDB went into effect. Moreover, the CDB is not automatically applied to people on these provincial programs, instead we have to apply by ourselves, but the process is a pain in the ass because before we can even attempt to apply to the CDB we have to be approved for the Disability Tax Credit, which, once again, is not automatically applied. To even apply for the DTC you need a doctor to sign off on it and it costs $250.

The easy solution would just be to not apply for the CDB, but here’s the thing, my province is FORCING us to apply to it, and if we do not notify them of our application process by September 5th they are going to claw-back the $200 anyway regardless of whether we have been approved for the CDB or not.

This all sounds incredibly unethical, right? So what can I do about it? I have been trying to call my disability program to get answers but apparently they are getting a very high number of calls (no shit, I wonder why) and I haven’t been able to speak to anyone regarding what I can do and what will happen if I refuse to go through with my CDB application. I wanted to contact the feds about this gross misuse of federal funding but apparently they wont do anything because they are allowing the provinces to do whatever they want, so far it seems only my province is clawing-back benefits. Not only are benefits being reduced, but rent is also going to skyrocket as well (a deliberate policy choice by the provincial government). This is just another example of the provinces having too much power.

I’ve seen people use the legal system to get things done but I do not know if that is something that I would be able to do. After trying to keep it together for so long since I got that stupid letter in the mail I have finally had a breakdown today. I hate this government and I want to fight back but I do not know how.

I wish my grandparents never immigrated here…

 

And I totally forgot. I literally woke up this morning confused as hell with all the texts I was getting from family, when I unlocked my phone I saw all the “Happy Birthday” messages and realized I am a year older today!

I know we aren’t supposed to reveal our ages but I will say that I am not yet 30 but it’ll be really cool once I get there.

My spring/summer semester is also over which means I am free until September so thats nice. My male dog also started on fluoxetine for his terrible anxiety, so hopefully he does well. Overall I am trying to stay chill and happy now that a new year has started for me, from today I will finally have time to start up on my Russian language lessons too.

 

I must disclose that this is not a common opinion. If I had a nickel for every time someone called Parenti a genocide denier I’d have two nickels, once on twitter and once on tumblr, which isn’t a lot but it’s weird that it’s happened twice.

I have a feeling this has something to do with his book To Kill a Nation but I have yet to read it so I have no idea.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/8123702

Hello comrades! I made a post about Anaam a while back and I am coming back to share her campaign because she has been messaging me on WhatsApp about her struggles.

Right now she has a rash and is in severe pain. She has asked for 1000 Danish Krone, but I am unable to give much as I am on a very limited income. She told me no one else is responding to her so I said I would reach out on her behalf.

Her campaign is almost completed, she only needs less than 2000 danish krone to make it to 100%. I know money is tight for everyone, so if you are unable to donate then please help spread this.

I do not know what else I can do.

 

Hello comrades! I made a post about Anaam a while back and I am coming back to share her campaign because she has been messaging me on WhatsApp about her struggles.

Right now she has a rash and is in severe pain. She has asked for 1000 Danish Krone, but I am unable to give much as I am on a very limited income. She told me no one else is responding to her so I said I would reach out on her behalf.

Her campaign is almost completed, she only needs less than 2000 danish krone to make it to 100%. I know money is tight for everyone, so if you are unable to donate then please help spread this.

I do not know what else I can do.

 

One of my slides for my presentation defines imperialism, using both Lenin and Parenti’s descriptions. Because of this I decided to take my male dog’s face and edit it onto Lenin to put on the slide.

It adds some humour, makes my slideshow visually interesting (most of the slides are plain), and it was a fun thing for me since I hate presenting. Plus he’s super cute. One day I will have to do the same to my other dog.

I have not done my presentation yet, it will happen in a few hours, but when I do I will let you all know how it goes.

 

For my political science class I have to make a presentation analyzing an article. She gave us a set amount to present on, all related to university, but because of my issues she’s allowing me to present by myself and on a topic I am passionate about as long as it is related to the university. I chose imperialism and how universities can be a weapon for it.

The article I am analyzing is called “Militarizing Education: the Intelligence Community’s Spy Camps,” it’s a chapter from the book the Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent. one of the chapters is actually written by Vijay Prashad but his felt a little less relevant to my project.

For the analysis part I had to find 5 scholarly sources, which you don’t have to worry about as I already found them. One of my sources is literally Lenin’s Imperialism the highest stage of capitalism. During my presentation I am going to talk about the School of Americas and I have some ideas on how to engage the class when that part comes, but at the end I have to do an “activity” with the class.

Previous presentations saw the class answer a series of questions, do group analysis on a few questions, and play a kahoot game. If it were up to me I’d just do my presentation and then sit my ass down. But I can’t do that so I’m asking for help from you.

Do you have any ideas on what I can do at the end of my presentation to fill out the “engagement” part of the grading rubric? I want to do well because I’ve been dying this semester.

 

I realize the title is confusing but I did not know what else to say.

A project for one of my semester 7 classes is requiring me to write a reflection paper on two conferences I attended. The problem? I have to have three academic sources to cite in this reflection, and the paper itself has to talk about “what impact the university has” based off these two conferences.

There were many conferences I could’ve chosen but I ended up choosing one that was about “multiculturalism, decolonization, and reconciliation through community” and the other was watching a documentary about Gay rights in Canada and then a panel was held with some of the makers of the movie.

The first conference made mentions about multiculturalism in Canada as a mere cover and not true justice, that they (the panelists, all radicalized women) were also being used in this way. One of the panelists even stated that decolonization requires a dismantling of the colonial system and a move away from capitalism, yet she did not state the alternative. When asked about China the woman, who is Taiwanese, stated that communism was a push against western imperialism but has its own form of imperialism. Another panelists talked about her experience with community gardens and how it connects people to the land and food production, this immediately reminded me of Marx’s alienation. This same panelist talked about how what they were talking about was risky as they could realistically be killed, but this was more in reference to her going back to, I believe, India.

So one of my sources is Marx’s Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts.

The second conference was difficult due to the fact that the bulk of it was a movie and I was unable to write any notes during the film, but it was about a man who was fired from his teaching job for being gay. This prompted him to go to the courts of Canada to fight against discrimination based on sexuality as it was not protected. That is inaccurate, it was protected in all provinces except one. First he went to the provincial court but the case was immediately dismissed with as much violent homophobia as you could think. Then it was brought to the Supreme Court where the case was won and sexuality was made a protected category under the Charter.

Anyway, the main important bits was that the people involved in the case were tacked ruthlessly with severe homophobia and that it took several years. One of the lawyers even invoked the memory of the Holocaust to make the case for protecting sexual minorities. During the panel everyone there agreed that, due to the current political climate, we could realistically see a sequel documentary based around trans rights. The director of the film also talked about the cuts to USAID being an issue for LGBT organization overseas, specifically in Poland.

I am sorry for the long explanations but I felt the need to provide this information as to give you all a better idea of what I am dealing with. My mind went to the “revolutionary academic” and how that is clearly not allowed, and thus I found a source kind of about that by Henry Etzkowitz called “The Second Academic Revolution.” I am mostly going to make my own point about how the revolutions described in that paper are not what I am talking about. I am having a hard time finding any pieces on academic revolutionaries, if thats even possible. I am also struggling with linking my second conference to the main point of the paper which, again, is about impact (whatever that means).

I apologize if this is too much to ask for, even steering me in the right direction would help, no need for actual sources if that is not possible or appropriate. I honestly have no one else to consult with on this.

If its any help I was also approved of using Lenin as a source for any of my projects, so nobody is off the table regardless of how “controversial” they are.

Thank you for any guidance you can give me.

 

Plus this other Mark Pettus book:

Pettus’ books actually have video lectures and free PDF worksheets that go along, so that’s cool. He also has bilingual books which may be helpful. I’ve seen around that the penguin book was a good intro as well. The dictionary is just for expanding my vocabulary.

This is all before I get a tutor, of course, which is something I’ll need to do eventually even if it makes me nervous as hell.

Just thought I’d share because of the Soviet aesthetics that Pettus uses, plus the Lenin one is funny (I promise it’s not the first book I’m cracking open).

view more: next ›