What first party solved the issue with PayPal? I literally want to see it burn but I don't have an alternative.

People who joke like that are disgusting.

I don't care who you are, if your best option is suicide, we failed you and we should be sorry.

I am against violence while I have no illusion about the fact that it seems necessary because bad humans need to fuck up everything for good humans.

But I want to stay that this is not a call for violence or an expression of my support for it.

But why the fuck does everyone and their grandmother have guns in the us and these people are alive? Isn't the point of the guns to protect the public from tyranny? I mean I don't think it works but that is the reason no? How are tyrannical forces allowed to have openly political activity? You guys don't have guns to fight for your "freedom🦅" it seems but to shoot your child when they sneak back into the house.

In my opinion, it is good that you guys don't murder each other but like... What is the point of those guns if not fighting literal Nazis?

Drop the gun bs or actually fight for your freedom or be honest why you want guns, it is fucked up that you want to be shot by your toddler but you do you, i guess.

"Help starving children!"

"But you wouldn't want to be there! Gotten!!!"

Coherent. Very coherent.

Imagine you live in a world where major voices of a political party is clearly expressing that their current guy will run down the world and thinks that it is a w, because the other guy is worse.

Thanks Dems, you fail the USA and the world at large! Literally ruining the only accessable livable planet. But w for not being trump!

Temu is also shady about your data. So lol, you fucked yourself too.

Der alte Mann ist unglücklich weil jemand ihn darauf hinweisen hat, dass wenn er Leute die das Bürgergeld beziehen nicht in Misskredit bringen will, sollte er sich nicht so auf die eigenen wenigen "Komplettverweigern" fokussieren in seiner Reden über das Bürgergeld. Zumal wenn es so ein kleiner Prozentsatz ist.

The argument is basically that it does too much and as the motto of Unix was basically "make it do 1 thing and that very well", systemd goes against that idea.

You might think it is silly because what is the issue with it doing many things. Arguably, it harms customization and adaptability, as you can't run only 2/3 of systemd with 1/3 being replaced with that super specific optimisation for your specific use case. Additional, again arguably, it apparently makes it harder to make it secure as it has a bigger attack surface.

I think the argument for moderation is the worst in the religious context.

Pascal was right about his Wager in one way. If god exists, it should change everything for you. Especially the christian one. Eternity in pain or pleasure outweighs everything.

If that is your reality, how is failing god moderation?

Seriously if you don't want people to die from cancer at all, how is that not extermist?

Are reference point defines "moderation"? Look at us vs eu politics.

Even if you want to define moderation as the average or median position in a society, then Nazism can be moderation if you get enough Nazi together.

Wake up, my fellow extremist.

That is surprisingly accurate

I am only a Linux user. I don't feel trans, nor am I a furry. Could you become a furry for me to average me out? Thanks!

That is a Firefox setting. I use it on my phone.