352
Many such cases (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 82 points 1 month ago

What first party solved the issue with PayPal? I literally want to see it burn but I don't have an alternative.

[-] tiramichu@lemm.ee 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't understand the PayPal one either.

Who is the 'first party' in this case? The banking system as a whole?

If it's the whole banking system then I'm not sure how that's solved, because as I understand in the US it's still not easy to send money to another private individual via the banking system. And there are Venmo and cashapp and such now but they are just other third parties.

Meanwhile in the UK here it has been possible for decades to send money between bank accounts directly, and free. I still use PayPal though, because my use for it isn't sending money to individuals, it's being able to buy things online without creating an account and without giving my card details.

Maybe people are thinking in phone terms, and the first party is "Apple" or "Google" and the solution is Apple Pay or Google Wallet?

[-] renzev@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

Thank you for providing a different point of view, I didn't realize things were so complicated in the united states. In the EU there is a system called iDEAL which iirc is maintained by a collaboration of different banks and lets you pay for stuff online instantly and with zero fee. For sending money person-to-person, there are apps like tikkie that are just a thin wrapper around iDEAL. And in cases where these things don't work, you can just do a direct bank transfer by typing in the other person's IBAN in your bank's app/website. Slightly less convenient, but still nearly instant and zero fee.

[-] groet@infosec.pub 33 points 1 month ago

Never heard of iDEAL. Wikipedia says its a a Dutch system that was acquired by the "European payments initiative" last year. The EPI just became active as a payment system 1 month ago.

This is VERY much still in development and not at all an established system in the EU.

[-] Mazesecle@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Not sure about the name of the systems, and I've seen them change names a lot over the years

But I think it's a pretty universal thing in the EU, that you're able to pay directly using an IBAN, I've even seen "direct bank tranfer" in stores that sell across the EU

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 month ago

As a german I've never heard about iDEAL. The Wikipedia article says that it is mainly used in the netherlands

[-] Redredme@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Ideal is not the same, by any means, as PayPal. Read up.

With ideal you loose your money. Ideal is made from the pov of the bank and the shop selling you stuff. Its almost impossible to claim your money back without the sellers consent.

Tikkie is not the same as PayPal since tikkie only works with EU banks. (and quite possibly at this moment only NL banks) PayPal does not need a bank account. Its also not really a wrapper around ideal but thats another discussion. And mostly a semantic one so lets not go there.

Effe wat meer moeite doen en de kleine lettertjes lezen medenedelander :)

[-] plunged_ewe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Actually, there's a better one for Europe. The Payment Services Directive 2 (PSD2) is an EU directive to allow payments to be done through APIs exposed by the bank. It's essentially a wrapper for a bank transfer. Most new payments companies are just unifying these APIs.

Some counties do it better than others. The UK is very good (with the exception of starling bank). I remember Hungary being a pain.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think it’s that PayPal was one of the firsts to provide a method for collecting credit card transactions electronically.

Before PayPal, you’d often have to visit a website, then call the phone number for the seller to collect payment.

eBay needed paypal because their sellers were often not businesses, just people yardsaling stuff online.

Coincidentally, I interned at a PayPal competitor in 1998 that went under during the bust. We had an electronic interface through MS access, but it was a still a human entering in the CC number into one of those dial pads on our side and then confirming the transaction. I’m sure with all of the concerns around security nowadays that you can understand why that was a terrible long term business model.

[-] tiramichu@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the context. Here in the UK I never experienced a website that didn't take payment via credit card directly as a first option - that's always been there default, with some sites offering PayPal as a second or third way to pay.

And about punching the numbers manually then well, sometimes a bit of Mechanical Turk works just fine lol! :)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Canada has Interac, Europe has another standard, the US has another standard... I wish they would all just get together and have a single way to do it that works everywhere in the world...

In the meantime: https://www.paypal.com/ca/webapps/mpp/country-worldwide

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

in the US it's still not easy to send money to another private individual via the banking system

Bizarre

[-] puchaczyk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

In Poland for online payments everyone uses Blik. It lets you generate six digit number in your banking app that you then give to the site you're making payment to. Your banking app then asks you if you want to make the payment with information about how much you pay and to whom. You accept and you're done, no card details were shared.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

In the EU we have SEPA instant transfers

For a global solution you'd want Wise or Revolut or something. Or PayPal, but the others have features PayPal doesn't. But there are instances where PayPal wins.

But all the different banking systems are still a mess sadly.

[-] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Given that banks' whole thing is transferring money you'd think they'd have got that sorted from the start but no.

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

My hypothesis on this is they just don’t want to facilitate moving money out of their bank to another one. Moving money between accounts held by the same bank is usually much easier. The major US banks are for-profit businesses, after all.

Alternative hypothesis - US banks aren’t implementing new features because they’re mostly all still running on ancient IBM mainframes.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I've heard from people in banking and in health care that regulations around transferring money and health information have not at all caught up to modern technology in the US. They're tedious and cumbersome, which means thing more more slowly and more haphazardly.

[-] Euphorazine@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

My guess is no one is willing to take on the liability. Any new system that introduces bugs or introduces attack vectors from hackers don't want to be responsible for any lost money and I'm sure banks/insurance don't want to take on the risk either.

Magnetic tape and clearing houses for the indefinite future!

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 16 points 1 month ago

Yea, this isn't US focused. A person working here from the UK told me "They tell us when we go over to expect a nice modern society with a third-world banking system. Oh, and guns."

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago
[-] tiramichu@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

That's just a different third party, though.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No? Is it? Isn't Zelle just like a directory?

Either way it's owned by the banks. It is the first party solution.

[-] tiramichu@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Then I think I was wrong, and you are right.

As someone not from the US I knew of zelle but never used it, and believed it was a direct competitor to Venmo or PayPal.

The reason I thought it was its own thing was because it has its own app, and a catchy silicon-valley-startup type name, and a brand logo, and all of that.

Contrast that to the UK where the ability to send free person-to-person payments has been integrated directly into the banking system for decades, and does not have it's own brand, or app or anything.

[-] Soulfulginger@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Zelle actually got rid of its app and is now incorporated directly in the banking apps themselves. It's kind of like a browser extension where it has its own section in the banking app

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Korne127@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

What's better than PayPal / what issues does PayPal have? I don't know any better alternative…

[-] badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

I assume just normal credit card payments online? PayPal started because people were scared to use their card online, but now you get all the same buyer protections and insurance.

[-] woodgen@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

How do you send money to friends or businesses with credit card? Is there a paypal card which has your login information printed on it?

[-] 0laura@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

just send them money to their bank account. it's a lot more common in Europe.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

I just use a bank transfer

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Laborer3652@reddthat.com 8 points 1 month ago

I'd rather have my credit card information on a highly secure platform like Paypal than give it out to every Tom, Dick, and Harry that asks for it on the internet.

Even if PayPal is only "mostly" secure, I still get better security from having a smaller attack surface.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

PayPal stole my money and I'm far from the only case. Venmo is much better, but still provides fundamentally the same service

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Which is weird because PayPal has owned Venmo for over a decade

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yep. Dunno what the difference is, but it works much better. Probably the underlying software is just better.

[-] grandkaiser@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Got bad news for you bud... Same bank.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

For a merchant; PayPal fees are quite high, their merchant support is abysmal and you have to be a decent size SME before you get a dedicated account manager.

And dont even get me started on their so called "merchant protection" offer for disputes.

[-] MissJinx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

yeah I like paypal and use it a lot

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 31 points 1 month ago

Jquery sucks now, compared to pure javascript? Now I feel old.

[-] GFGJewbacca@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I don't get it either. I made a store for my website a couple of years ago, and jQuery was crucial for me to handle all the events and triggers. Trying to do it in pure JavaScript looked like a complete nightmare.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

Many of the things that jQuery made easy back in the day are now pretty easy with pure js (Ajax calls, improved selectors, programmatic DOM manipulation, etc), and browser support for most JS features is way more standardized.

Granted, your pure JS is likely to be way more verbose to write, making it look more intimidating than jQuery.

That being said. jQuery is performant in modern browsers, and when being delivered compressed and minified is tiny, so if you want to use it, go for it. Anybody who criticizes you or tells you “you should use [x]” for your online store or website is a JS elitist.

jQuery is really only a “bad” choice for big interactive web apps, where frameworks that handle state and routing independently of the DOM are a much better choice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ahardyfellow@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 month ago

I just created a new tool for my company, and I opted to leave out jQuery as I wanted to see how it would be without it.

After going through the process I don't think I'll use jQuery again unless it is already a dependancy. Vanilla pretty much has everything covered that jQuery made easier, just need to be a bit more verbose in some cases, but I've found that typically makes the code easier to read and modify.

No hate if jQuery is your thing though, just if you're on the fence I'd give vanilla a go and see if it fits your needs!

[-] _____@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

jQuery is very slept on imo. I think new Gen react heads don't understand just how much you can do. Iirc the minimized size is also very small.

[-] Lumilias@pawb.social 20 points 1 month ago

On the enterprise side, we use McAfee/Trellix and we’re pretty much glued to them for endpoint security. Why? Nobody else allows you to write custom YARA rules straight to the IPS engine like Trellix does.

Every other vendor only allows you to use rules they have defined for you and doesn’t give you that low level access. It’s frustrating because their support is dogshit too, but my company has niched itself into a corner.

[-] theotterone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Only run as an experiment myself but Wazuh can do it apparently: https://documentation.wazuh.com/current/proof-of-concept-guide/detect-malware-yara-integration.html

MDE can do something similar but you'll need to rewrite your rules which is of course more than suboptimal.. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-xdr/advanced-hunting-overview?view=o365-worldwide

[-] Lumilias@pawb.social 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Interesting, never heard of Wazuh until now. That looks closer to what Trellix allows.

The guy in charge of picking endpoint security products (whose team writes these rules) has tried Defender and found it lacking in comparison. Also, that link is about historical search for threat hunting, so I’m not sure if it’s the correct one.

Edit: I just saw the section about writing detections, but that seems to be more of a reactive than proactive approach. It still does the detection from searches.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

jQuery

We gonna ignore the crap storm that is JS frameworks, npm packages, and entire superset language to make JS half usable?

Not to mention literally everyone still uses jQuery while pretending not to.

[-] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I feel like Jquery is unfairly lumped in here.

While other solutions have eclipsed Jquery, it doesn't mean it's in any way bad. Unlike the other products here, it's still a capable library that solves the tasks it sets out to do. It never became a bloated mess or sold out to the highest bitter.

That being said I wouldn't really use it today. It doesn't play that well with modern tooling, and it is extremely easy to write anti patterns into your code. I would recommend either VanillaJS, a web component library like Svelte, or React depending on what you're trying to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago
[-] Waveform@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

That's why you branch out

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
352 points (97.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26167 readers
3135 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS