antonim

joined 2 years ago
[–] antonim@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You're by far the most rude and snarky person in this whole comment chain.

Even if I don’t need data or a scientific explanation of why the bulk (mainstream) music is getting worse.

I mean, you are the one who brought up scientific explanations and are currently trying to defend them...

but cherrypick loops

It was just one example. The other ones are more vague, but even going off the general meaning it's obvious they're meant to apply to modern western music and would fail outside of it.

It’s about OVER USE of the same loops and presets.

Yeah, ok, I understood that.

So this is irrelevant

It is irrelevant that your quasi-objective standards easily fail when applied to somewhat unconventional music?

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think he was a dick. He wasn't very tactful, but he wasn't insulting you.

You can quantity it, but that doesn't mean the quantification is meaningful and correlates with literally anything else. Like, loops are bad? I guess I should inform all those classical music critics they're actually dumb for liking Terry Riley and Steve Reich.

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I was wondering what song it might be as I was clicking on the link. Hmm, 1974, that's the time when prog was going strong, maybe King Crimson...

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Yeah, that "Lyrics style and emotion descriptors" section is absolutely ridiculous from the perspective of aesthetic judgment. No normal listener or professional critic judges music and lyrics on the basis of, I quote, "unique token ratio, repeated token ratio, pronoun frequency, line count, or punctuation counts".

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

"Don't dead open inside" ahh bible

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I kind of doubt that even when it comes to English, and for smaller languages i'm sure that there's still no serious competition to Google.

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 45 points 6 days ago (2 children)
  1. Hype up AI.

  2. Everyone starts scraping the internet to obtain training data for their AI.

  3. To block the scrapers, countless sites implement stricter bot detection tools.

  4. The owners of the bot detection tools now effectively hold all of the internet by its throat, deciding who can access what and extorting more and more data from you to verify you're human.

Fucking genius.

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

the next link down on the search results

Assuming we'll have that at all or just AI summaries replacing the results.

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are people already getting these AI-only, blue-link-less Google results? Mine are still normal.

 

Thinking about language structures is made difficult not only by their incredible complexity, but also by entrenched ways of thinking about grammatical and lexical patterns. Linguists do not investigate languages in fresh way, but against the background (and often on the basis) of a centuries-old tradition.

Could it be that these traditional and stereotypical ways of thinking sometimes get in the way of approaching our objects of study in a fair way? Few linguists would deny this possibility, so here I will list four ways in which this may have adversely affected morphosyntactic descriptions and general theories:

– the word stereotype (1)

– the grammar/dictionary stereotype (2)

– the building-block stereotype (3)

– the speaker directionality stereotype (4)

My really bad TLDR: words don't exist, grammar is like words and words are like grammar, language isn't done by putting things one after the other, and we study too much how we make language and not enough how we make sense of language. Bonus sub-point: we like to say A is made of B but we could also say B is made of A.

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, the different versions don't have to be synchronised, and the standards for sources differ (outside of the big European languages, the standards are much lower and there's much more bullshit out there), and simply you can have one editor doing things the way they prefer on one wiki, an another editor with their preferences on the other one. Some of that can be a result of different local cultures or academic traditions (different terminology, different systems of classification, etc.).

Btw there's currently a project that's supposed to solve this, "Abstract Wikipedia", the idea being that you enter information that's language-independent and that can be converted into any individual language.

(It's really bad and won't work out.)

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm increasingly getting the impression that WMF is very self-centred, disconnected from the practical reality of wiki editors and readers (much of its staff doesn't even have experience with wiki editing!). There are some notable exceptions but the overall picture is not good...

 

Since 2016–2019, aggregate monthly pageviews of Wikipedia's "Vital Articles" are down −26% across eight major languages I sampled (en, es, fr, de, it, pt, ja, ar). The Vital Articles are an imperfect set, but they cover a much broader set of topics than my last sample set, and are widely replicated across wikis. (All of these wikis have at least 80% of the articles, making it more apples-to-apples.)

The decline isn't even across topics. Mathematics, physical sciences, and technology are down 43% to 85%; biographical articles and geography are down less than 10% in half the languages I looked at. The per-topic ordering (which have declined the most or the least) is nearly identical in every one of the eight languages.

Freshness of article content matters, but not as strongly as topic.

– Luis Villa

 

https://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/524

Despite decades of scholarship on lexical borrowing in post-Conquest England, the vocabulary of the medieval countryside has remained largely outside the lens of contact linguistics — an oversight shaped by the long-standing assumption that French influence was confined to elite domains. At the same time, the multilingual reality of medieval England has made monolingual lexicography an increasingly inadequate tool: the Anglo-French, Medieval Latin, and Middle English lexicons of the period cannot be studied in isolation, yet no single trilingual resource has existed to study them together.

This book provides that resource. Drawing on the historical dictionaries of all three languages and grounded in cognitive semantics, it constructs an onomasiological thesaurus of the vocabulary associated with the medieval English manor — concepts and referents attested from 1100 to 1500, arranged in conceptual groupings modelled on the structure of the Historical Thesaurus of English and the Bilingual Thesaurus of Everyday Life in Medieval England.

The findings reframe received assumptions. Language contact shaped the rural lexicon far more deeply than the literature has claimed: French- and Latin-origin vocabulary dominates the terminology of manorial society, while native English holds its ground in the vocabulary of familiar locations. The asymmetry illuminates the social mechanics of borrowing in non-elite environments and carries implications for the history of English into the present day.

 

Most people, including many competent software developers, think of a digital document the way they think of a sheet of paper: an inert object that holds words and pictures, indifferent to the tool used to open it. This intuition is wrong, and the consequences of getting it wrong shape everything from vendor lock-in to cybersecurity to the long-term readability of public records.

 

First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area.

Attribution: WAFA

Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia.

Attribution: Giles Laurent

Third place: A gigantic jet [a kind of upper-atmospheric lightning] photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers.

Full results here

 
 

According to him, the country’s economy “hit rock bottom” in the first quarter, which could lead to a crisis.

Zyuganov also suggested that the situation this fall could resemble the events of 1917, when the communists came to power.

Video with English subtitles available here: https://bsky.app/profile/antongerashchenko.bsky.social/post/3mk3d7tu6m22v

 

The Document Foundation was created in 2010 with a single, non-negotiable premise: that a free, fully-featured office suite, built on open standards and governed in the public interest, is infrastructure for democracy. Not a product. Not a market position. Infrastructure, the kind that belongs to everyone and can be taken from no one.

Sixteen years later, that premise is under pressure. And it is worth stating clearly, on the record, what TDF is, what it has done, what it is doing, and why the decisions it has made – including the difficult ones – follow directly from the founding commitment rather than betraying it.

 

Ovdje Noć knjige, tamo sumrak čitanja. Ovdje Dua Lipa preporučuje Margaret Atwood, tamo Sarah Jessica Parker žirira Bookera. Ovdje luksuzni književni salon Chanela, tamo se Nina Obuljen Koržinek druži s klincima. Ovdje internetski slop, tamo #BookTok. Novosti donose specijalni izazov – možete li uopće pročitati ovaj tekst do kraja?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/45228666

A new episode of LibreOffice/Collabora drama.

After years of discussions marked by accusations and finger-pointing, during which no real progress was made in resolving the legal issues, the authorities requested an audit whose results confirmed that resolving the issues was absolutely necessary to avoid losing non-profit status, with unforeseen consequences.

Unfortunately, the presence of company representatives on the Board of Directors (BoD), who were elected by employees of those same companies that are also TDF members, caused further delays to finding a solution, which has not yet been reached.

Fortunately, the introduction of restrictive measures – such as the decision to forfeit TDF membership status of Collabora employees – and the freezing of tenders, alongside the introduction of a robust procurement policy for development, has resulted in a positive outcome for the third audit. At least, the BoD has demonstrated a willingness to break the deadlock that has persisted since 2022.

 

old school

view more: next ›