antonim

joined 3 years ago
 
[–] antonim@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Google (and/or the libraries that collaborate with Google Books) and Archive.org usually scan non-destructively. Some of Google's book scans still show the fingers holding the corners of the pages, some of them were taken mistakenly mid-flip, etc. So they clearly used whole, normally bound books.

 
[–] antonim@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I mean, yes, that's true.

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Except that the alternative method, the "whole word" approach, seems to have way worse outcomes.

 
[–] antonim@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Ohh, I like that idea!

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The direction is the trickier part of the problem. Bending over seems to be the only way to get the water directly hit the asshole, although then the asshole water would wash over the rest of your body as well

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

.is uses some techniques to circumvent paywalls, whereas .org just accesses the site normally. I hope a competitor to .is will show up at some point.

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As opposed to all the other countries that can't censor and delete content or shut websites down?

 

I make the case that Wikipedia communities often do not live up to their intent to be inclusive in internal policy-making; that our policies are more conservative than we realize; and that a large part of the reason is structural – the twenty-year-old format we use to make decisions is quietly working against us. Our processes have been designed with an abundance of time in mind, in an era of exponential growth. That time is over. The good news, which I'll come back to in a companion post, is that there are tangible ways to make these processes better.

 
 
[–] antonim@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

make it so you don’t need to cry because you can’t remember the fucking unit square and your masochist calc prof wants you to do trig operations without a calculator.

The problem here is in the professor, not in limiting calculator usage as such.

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A half-wrong cheating tool can still be useful if you haven't done any studying at all.

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Motorists

I don't have a car or motor, I don't even have a driver's license, I go around largely by public transport. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a part of the same secret cult out to get you, I certainly don't think cars should be preferred by default to bikes or to mass public transport, I simply found your specific arguments to be wrong or questionable. You of course went all out fantasising who I am and what's my motivation...

I'd much prefer to be hit by a truck while I'm in a car than while I'm on a bike, thank you very much. Overall I think there's so much fewer trucks on the roads than cars that cars are, in absolute numbers, more dangerous for bikers and pedestrians than trucks. Maybe statistics would prove me wrong here, idk. (Note: I live in Europe, the cars usually used here and the overall traffic infrastructure are different than in the US.)

https://www.reddit.com/r/bicycletouring/comments/xe1m1e/legal_issues_with_bicycle_trailer/ - are these people crazy or dumb for discussing the legal limits for bike trailers and the potential problems with their weight and width?

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

it gets more downvotes that rt ever did

It got 12 downvotes, I'm pretty sure RT has gotten more.

I don't see anything special about these downvotes. People don't judge and up/downvote sources just based on which "empire" they're "aligned with" (we're not hiveminds, after all). In the case of Russia-Ukraine war on Lemmy, I'd say the well has been poisoned for most writing critical or skeptical of Ukraine's situation and actions to a large degree because of the regular spamming with RT, TASS and even openly fascist news sources by .ml's Russia supporters. People like to see things in black and white, and seeing whichever side's brainless propaganda doesn't help.

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Just like cars?

No, cars can easily be used in much worse weather than bikes.

As bad as cars?

Worse. It may sound surprising, but in a traffic accident being inside a car protects you more than just having a helmet.

Not as limited as you think.

I wonder if that thing is even legal to drive.

 
 
 
 

Pioneering physicist Max Planck had two papers retracted decades after his death for reasons that remain mysterious.

 

What began as a “flamingo revolution” to protest the $1.4 billion development on Sazan Island has spiraled into mass protests against a ruling party that thousands now want out.

Without paywall: http://archive.today/w4DDj

 

In October 1776, Wilkinson contracted an epidemic disease, most likely typhus, and was bedridden and near death with a high fever. The future preacher's family summoned a doctor from Attleboro, six miles away, and neighbors kept up a death-watch at night. The fever broke after several days. The Friend later reported that Wilkinson had died, receiving revelations from God through two archangels who proclaimed there was "Room, Room, Room, in the many Mansions of eternal glory for Thee and for everyone". Accounts by the doctor and other witnesses state that the illness was real, but none of them say that Wilkinson died. The Friend further said that Wilkinson's soul had ascended to heaven and the body had been reanimated with a new spirit charged by God with preaching his word, that of the "Publick Universal Friend", describing that name in the words of Isaiah 62:2 as "a new name which the mouth of the Lord hath named". The name referenced the designation the Society of Friends used for members who traveled from community to community to preach, "Public Friends".

From that time on, the Friend refused to answer to the name "Jemima Wilkinson", ignoring or chastising those who insisted on using it. Hudson says that when visitors asked if it was the name of the person they were addressing, the Friend simply quoted Luke 23:3 ("thou sayest it").  Identifying as neither male nor female, the Friend asked not to be referred to with gendered pronouns. Followers respected these wishes; they referred only to "the Public Universal Friend" or short forms such as "the Friend" or "P.U.F.", and many avoided gender-specific pronouns even in private diaries, while others used he. When someone asked if the Friend was male or female, the preacher replied "I am that I am", saying the same thing to a man who criticized the Friend's manner of dress (adding, in the latter case, "there is nothing indecent or improper in my dress or appearance; I am not accountable to mortals").

The Friend dressed in a manner perceived to be either androgynous or masculine, in long, loose clerical robes which were most often black, and wore a white or purple kerchief or cravat around the neck like men of the time. The preacher did not wear a hair-cap indoors, like women of the era, and outdoors wore broad-brimmed, low-crowned beaver hats of a style worn by Quaker men. Accounts of the Friend's "feminine-masculine tone of voice" varied; some hearers described it as "clear and harmonious", or said the preacher spoke "with ease and facility", "clearly, though without elegance". Others described it as "grum and shrill", or like a "kind of croak, unearthly and sepulchral". The Friend was said to move easily, freely, and modestly, and was described by Ezra Stiles as "decent & graceful & grave".

view more: next ›