So, OP, where are you from?
antonim
I understand, but this is still coming off as "being the general after the battle". I.e. judging the mistakes done by scientists while the available knowledge was more limited. The shift towards portraying dinosaurs with feathers was triggered by, well, discovering dinosaur fossils with feathers. We made a discovery and corrected accordingly.
Of course we should be aware of the limits of studying and reconstructing prehistorical species in general, I'd say most popular dino media downplays or ignores the difficulties and doubts in the endavour, presenting the conclusions as a given rather than as an educated guess, without showing the "behind the scenes". But the image of "scary, giant lizards" in popular perception has IMO been on the decline since Walking with Dinosaurs from 1999 - of course, the exaggerated Jurassic Park and its increasingly trashy sequels and similar media have had more of a broad cultural presence, but that's not much to do with paleontology and serious paleo-art.
"Completely wrong" is an exaggeration, would portraying a chicken without feathers be "completely wrong"? Of course not, if the overall anatomy is plausible, it would be inaccurate in one regard but not scientifically or illustratively worthless.
No, not all dinosaurs were feathered. Some definitely were not feathered (we have evidence of their scaly exterior, most impressively this armoured dinosaur specimen) while certain other clades definitely were, for which we have strong evidence, and thus species such as Velociraptor have been reconstructed with feathers even in the most broad-audiences-oriented media for over two decades. For many species it's uncertain. So no, many of the featherless reconstructions are still not wrong in that department, considering our current knowledge.
I find this sort of "reconstruction" kind of disingenuous. Dinosaurs were reptiles, so they're reconstructed to look roughly like reptiles of today. Of course the approach gives wildly inaccurate results on mammals, but on modem reptiles it would be alright. This same approach isn't taken to reconstructing prehistoric birds or mammals either.
That's not to say dinosaurs haven't been portrayed as too bony for the coolness effect or that the Dunkleosteus wasn't subject to the same exaggerated treatment, but why go into the other extreme?
I just checked r/serbia. People are saying he's probably lying (he already said he'd resign and then didn't) or that he'd just do the Putin-Medvedev sort of switch to PM position. Overall, total indifference from the population.
RETVRN TO... donke?
They're not really claiming copyright, Springer is just selling the articles (anyone can sell copies of public domain texts). The problem is in their moronic mechanical attempt (probably not even checked by a lawyer) at "detecting" copyright infringement by comparing two editions of the same article.
checks notes… alleged neo-Nazis
Allow me to present this handy guide:

If so, i'd expect Iran to publicly distance itself from the attack. According to the article, they still haven't made any official statement. Does Russia have military presence in the region?
Per Wikipedia:
Tens of thousands in daily protests; 100,000–200,000 at the 13 June rally; more than 250,000 estimated at the 20 June rally
And Albania has a population of 2.4 million.
Yeah, USSR progressively legalised homosexuality and then even more progressively made it illegal again, while the regressive fascist liberal west still hasn't caught up to the second step 🤣



It has no added artificial preservatives, obviously.