cmhe

joined 2 years ago
[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This is an ad for Tuta, which server side software is, AFAIK proprietary. You cannot self-host.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Most people use whatever is the default, even if that default doesn't perfectly is to their needs/wants.

That applies even to people that changed their search engine form Google to Duckduckgo.

Every decisions takes some energy to think about, and the human brain wants to avoid spending energy as much as possible.

That is why LLMs should be opt-in/by-request instead of opt-out. If people want to occasionally use them, they can decide themselves if spending that additional electricity is worth it.

Search engines and LLMs are different things, one is for finding content written by humans, the other is for getting a plausible answer to a inquiry.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well, it shouldn't be carbon neutral... It should used to get carbon out of the atmosphere and into a less damaging substance.

Carbon capture does not replace getting rid of our dependency on burning fossil fuels.

We wouldn't get back the same amount that we are burning anyway. So this approach is worse, because dumb people think it would save us, without us changing the way we produce energy.

It is worse, because it is a distraction from actually doing something.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Carbon dioxide needs to be captured were there is a lot of carbon dioxide in the air. So especially around cities with lots of car traffic, or around fossil fuel power plants...

So... It would be better to stop car traffic and fossil fuel power plants first, before doing carbon capture. And the purpose of that should be, making the air cleaner. And putting that carbon back into a less environmental damaging state.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It really depends on the purpose. Sometimes you can hide stuff in unexpected places when there isn't much interest for other people to find it, or if they don't even know about it's existence.

Also sometimes it is good enough to just delay the discovery of something for a while, because its value after a certain time diminished completely.

So, I would argue that sometimes security by obscurity can be useful. But I agree that it generally shouldn't replace proper encryption.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Wie schnell "Schrittgeschwindigkeit" ist, ist leider nicht klar festgesetzt... Gerichte akzeptieren bis zu 15km/h. Und am Ende, wenn Nicht-Autofahrer auf ihre Rechte bestehen wollen, sind die eh mitschuldig.

https://www.adac.de/verkehr/recht/verkehrsvorschriften-deutschland/schrittgeschwindigkeit/

In allen Fällen wird Fußgängern ein umsichtiges vorausschauendes Verhalten abverlangt. Wer sich – ohne zu gucken – auf die Wartepflicht des Autos verlässt, den trifft regelmäßig eine Mitschuld von 25%. Das Mitverschulden kann je nach Umständen des Einzelfalls auch höher ausfallen. So kann den Fußgänger sogar eine 100%-ige Schuld treffen, wenn er sich sein Vorrecht erzwingt.

https://rechtstipp24.de/2020/07/30/vorfahrt-fuer-fussgaenger-in-welchen-faellen-autofahrer-warten-muessen/

Also, nicht darauf verlassen das sich Autofahrer an die Regeln halten, und bloß nicht auf die Rechte gegenüber Autofahrern bestehen.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

IDK, OSM is much more detailed and up to date.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Btrfs is a filesystem just like ext4, you can mount the root subvolume and upload all files somewhere.

Timeshift is not a backup solution though. Snapshots are built-in with btrfs. So you can install a snapshotter tool like Snapper. But it would be best if you already have partitioned you btrfs filesystem into multiple subvolumes. Like the suggested layout.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

More like disassociation. They just don't connect killing animals to eating meat. So they don't feel a cognitive dissonance.

Like... People living comfortable in captialistic countries/societies, don't think they personally kill all victims of capitalism. They just don't connect these things. They disassociate their life and living standards from the 'others'.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Testing SPECIAL with games seems boring. They should do a multi layered social deduction game instead, where everyone has different goals, lies to another and nobody really understands what is going on until the end.

So some contestants are actors, and think they know where the show is going, but they are tricked as well.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Das Trifft halt nur die Webseiten d.h. die Rampe am Gebäude, mir geht es mehr um den Weg zur Webseite. Also der Infrastruktur. Und hier, sollte wie gesagt jeder ohne Extraaufwand und Kosten angebunden sein. Grundversorgung, wie der Fußweg von der Wohnung zum Rathaus.

Denke bei Barrierefreiheit nicht nur an körperlich eingeschränkte Personen, sondern auch beispielsweise an Obdachlose.

view more: next ›