this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
956 points (98.1% liked)

Greentext

6554 readers
863 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To be honest, I haven’t seen anyone else mention the real reason: America allowed private companies to buy and own the lands under the rails in the 1800s in order to deal with the massive distances across the US to connect the West and East. 150 years later and just a few companies own almost all the track and rail across America. Almost all private, not public land. Public citizens and communities have very little control over the railways going through their communities. These companies lobby against and make it difficult to introduce new, public rail lines for a multitude of reasons. This is one of very many examples of how corporations abuse law, monopolistic practices, and media to lessen the power of American citizens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 127 points 5 days ago (13 children)

Yeah why doesn't Europe have trains?

Europe definitely doesn't have trains already.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 84 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Still too much plane for local journeys

And is France train are not cheaper than planes or buses... Which is stupid, they should start to properly taxe Airlines

[–] Tenkard@lemmy.ml 21 points 5 days ago

They're building high speed rails connecting major European cities as we speak, we'll be good

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 31 points 5 days ago (7 children)

We do. Not as much as we used to because privatisation is a plague upon mankind, also we have very diverse geography which makes developing new lines prohibitively expensive, even more so when you're a private company. Add to that a lack of political backing and yeah, it's all rather turgid, even if there are some extremely recent talks concerning transeuropean night trains and such.

Those are going to be for our nice flat and speedy routes no doubt, but hey, it's an effort in the right direction.

But yeah, things are not gonna get better fast as long as we are cursed with privatisation. What a shit show to see our glorious TGV reduced to a shell of its former self.

Meanwhile I just got an article yesterday that Wuhan is now connected to the super high speed network and the first 450kph train now connects it to Shanghai. Last time I was there the train was already TGV levels of speed and much more modern, and only a year later they are leaving us on the fucking dust...

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 65 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Americans can't do trains because it requires public infrastructure (rails), which apparently we are allergic to.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 31 points 4 days ago (9 children)

I've read articles in the past about high speed trains and/or just new train lines in general would get held up by little towns who didn't want to lose the commuter traffic since it was the only thing keeping them afloat. There are too many towns that exist literally just to serve motorists and now nobody wants to get rid of them.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

Anybody who is making money off existing transportation is going to be against public transportation. Cab companies lobby against rail everywhere, from city to burbs or airport to downtown. Trucking, for obvious reasons. Passenger rail can carry cargo at night. And of course anybody selling fuel to the mass of cars, the petro industry.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago (10 children)

They are just very short sighted. Just lobby to have a station and a have commuter stops and people will flock to those "cheaper" areas to live bringing in tons of tax revenue and boosting the local economy.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] epicstove@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago

I was in Switzerland and the trains there are incredible. Even the tiniest village in buttfucksburg, nowhere has a train connecting it to the rest of the country.

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 34 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Americans can't do high speed rail because we have aircraft, automobile, and petroleum industries who don't want us to.

[–] callyral@pawb.social 10 points 4 days ago

ah, the free market

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz 65 points 5 days ago (13 children)

If high speed rail becomes popular, all that stands between the current freedom and ID-required tickets and fingering by agents is one terrorist attack, staged or not.

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 70 points 5 days ago (21 children)

What are you going to do with a hijacked train? The moment you hijack it they’ll just shutdown power. Hostages? Good luck there are like 30 carts on the train all of which have window break tools and emergency door open tools.

Look at Germany or France. High speed trains are everywhere and there is no ID requirement beyond maybe a ticket check if you’re unlucky.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] InfiniteHench@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I’m a huge train and transit advocate and I try to take Amtrak every chance I get. But “tickets are cheaper” does not feel like a blanket statement we can make. Maybe on very specific, usually short legs, like Chicago to Milwaukee. Someone correct me if I’m wrong or there’s more nuance but once a trip goes past 3 or 5+ hour mark, the price seems to skyrocket past airfare.

[–] AlreadyDefederated@midwest.social 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Oh, that is definitely true in the U.S.

Also, I've found that rail travel is inconvenient in the U.S. I can't confirm, but it seems like the Amtrak only comes through my (Midwest) area once a week, on Wednesdays or something like that. So, if I plan a trip, I need to plan around.

Midwest to the East Coast is so much cheaper and faster by air. I want to travel by rail - and you'd think it should be cheaper - but it's totally not.

Part of it, I believe, is that Amtrak leases the usage of the rail lines from the shipping companies, so it must adhere to their schedules of shipping freight. The USA spends so much on upgrading its highway system; if they used a fraction of that money towards rail travel we would be set. But certain companies keep lobbying Congress to keep us locked in a model where we are totally reliant on cars and gasoline.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

Meanwhile, right wing parties in Quebec are fighting against a tramway project in Quebec city, that the entire country agreed to pay for, for which we have already invested half a billion, build stations, etc. They call it "War on cars".

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Honestly I think it's just sticker shock. I would say that as soon as we get some people would be more willing to get more, but no, because people are hesitant to expand existing rail. MARTA please expand, I beg you. Oh great spirits of public transit, I pray that you soften the NIMBYs' hearts.

It's so upsetting that every small town in my state has an old historic train stop but none of them are actually passenger train stops anymore. Once you see it you can't unsee it. I am 15 minutes from my town's historic train stop which is a steak house now. My parents are about the same distance from theirs, probably even closer, but it's a museum or something. Can I just take a walk to the train, ride down, and see them? Nope. Gotta deal with the hellscape that is metro Atlanta traffic.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago (19 children)

soften nimby hearts

They can soften the nimbys' hearts, but ill take them cooked to charcoal if that's what it takes.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 4 days ago

This again? The answer is no one knows. We heard legends about it but the prophecy says line go up!

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (2 children)

As someone who boycotted the TSA for like 5 years and only took Amtrak, the tickets are not always cheaper. I mean sure, you can get across the country for like $100.

Even when I was doing Boston-Baltimore on the Acela, it was routinely slightly cheaper to fly.

[–] entropicdrift 32 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Amtrak is not cheaper, but trains in other countries are. Because Amtrak, specifically, sucks.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hzl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trains not planes is a much more reasonable and practical way to get people behind building more railways than planes not cars. We can talk planes not cars once some of the initial infrastructure is in place, but I think focusing on replacing something people hate (flying) rather than replacing something they like (driving) is probably a good place to start.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daellat@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I recently went on a holiday using high speed rail in Europe (1100km). Flying was cheaper and faster. Sadly I have feeling of empathy and principles so I went with the train anyway. Wasn't too bad though just did a lot of reading.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 30 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The monkey paw grants your wish but all the trains are built by Boeing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 17 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Cheaper? come to the UK, where flying can be less expensive than rail

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

The US public transportation, especially the passenger rail network is fucking pathetic.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

And for one more added bonus we wouldn’t have to fix the problems with air traffic control

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Is there any parody porn about TSA? I want to masturbate to it. As long as it's not too noncon (like TSA in real life), I don't really care about the details (I'm ok with any gender, large insertions/fisting, etc.).

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 4 days ago

Is there any parody porn about [a thing]?

Yes. The answer is always yes.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 13 points 4 days ago

TSA exists, therefore...

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I really really wish I wasn't American

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why would Americans care about trains when they're gonna be a billionaire any day now and have their own private jet?

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah i got used to TSA sexually assulting me just to get to the to my plane

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 21 points 5 days ago (12 children)

Not to shit on your perfectly reasonable parade, but in Germany there is high speed rail through the whole . takes about 6 hours from top to bottom.

Now look at the scale of the US versus Germany and then the density of people living there. High speed rail makes alot of sense where it's difficult to build (bosnywash) and does not scale well in terms of time spent traveling.

Its better than car, but won't replace air travel anytime soon. Sadly.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

France has nearly the same population density as Ohio, and it has the TGV, which covers more than 5 times the land area of Ohio. So where's the Ohio high speed rail network?

This is the scale of Japan compared to the US east coast:

So why aren't there high speed lines that cover that same distance in the US?

Americans complain about US politicians and US policy on a near constant basis, and yet when comparing the US to other nations its apparently impossible for anyone to have made a stupid or self-serving decision. The US apparently is always operating at the absolute limit of what's physically possible, and if there's any deficiency compared to its peers its never because something was done wrong. Its always because "the US is too big" or "we're too diverse" (what does that even mean? You can't have nice things because black people exist?).

To be clear there are actual answers to the questions I posed above, but its not either of those moronic excuses.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›