I love that you found this workaround, but arguably that code path should do the admin check, too.

The annoying thing is that the annoying guys are more likely to get a date, while they just go about their day. Not because they are better, or because their methods are good, but purely because they approach more people.

I hate making people feel uncomfortable (no matter their gender), so I always struggled finding "spontaneous" dates, or even dancing with strangers at a club/party.

The only thing that really worked for me was using dating apps, where both parties have implicitly indicated that they are looking for dates in general (because they're on the app) and explicitly indicated that they are interested in each other (by liking their profile, or whatever).

Although I've heard the apps have all gotten worse lately, I wouldn't really know, as I found someone on Tinder years ago, and now we're happily married.

Which, unfortunately, is far too often. In my recent experience..

Needs more baguette!

Thanks DALL-E

For the uninitiated:

Why is this "news"?

Just don't go on Xitter and you won't have these "problems"...

It would be awesome if someone had been querying it with the same prompt periodically (every day or something), to compare how responses have changed over time.

I guess the best time to have done this would have been when it first released, but perhaps the second best time is now..

Exiting with a cool ~$9m. Not too shabby.

And since he's been there since before the IPO, he's probably done pretty well for himself, regardless.

If you're drunk or stoned, it's much better to order some delivery than to drive anywhere.

Obviously you could plan ahead to avoid this, but I would rather have gig apps than impaired drivers on the road.

As an olive hater and tomato sauce purist:

that's not even a pizza anymore.

For the unaware:

First posted in 2013, I believe..

I like how 3 of them, across almost 20 years, boil down to "learn Python". When's that dude gonna die??