Simply noone ever looked and it's not documented. And the api is locked to work only on google domains so it wasn't usable to anyone to accidentally notice what's going on.

The code doesn't do anything on non-Google domains.

Luca says this - I'm inclined to agree:

This is interesting because it is a clear violation of the idea that browser vendors should not give preference to their websites over anyone elses.

Follow up question: How many other parts of the chromium codebase limited to work on (maybe other) specific domains?

No, they are called metallophones, glockenspiel is just one of them. Other common metallophones are the tubular bells and the vibraphone

That's changeing: in the ongoing SFC vs Vizio, SFC is just a regular user: https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html

Even FSF updated it's FAQ, that it's not true anymore: https://www.fsf.org/news/fsf-to-be-deposed-in-sfc-v-vizio-updates-relevant-faq-entry

Most of reddit was already archived before: https://the-eye.eu/redarcs/

Wikipedia has a long list about different language versions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dora_the_Explorer#Foreign_adaptations

Tldr: in non-english versions, usually the second language is English. Exceptions: Serbian and Irish teach Spanish, Kannada version teaches Hindi.

But it has a middle separator, perfect example of hostile architecture. For the uninitiated: the armrest in the middle's only function is to stop people lying on the bench. Homeless people can't sleep here, we finally solved the problem of homelessness, hurray!

Here: https://kernel.org/

I can already read the title of the page and see the favicon, so it actually doesn't show new information. If I accidentally move my mouse there it covers a big part of the page i'm looking at

His name was Almon Brown Strowger, not Stronger... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almon_Brown_Strowger

And there is no source for this story on wiki, it cites another wiki, where there isn't any more source either. So it's possible that this story is made up, or at least not exactly how it happened.

This video is very misleading.

• The reconstructions only affected some of the stones, which were already damaged or fallen, not all of them
• We have several photos from the 19th century, so you can compare the current state with the one before, the first reconstruction was in 1901

It's not some secret, you can read this on wikipedia, with more facts, e.g exact list of moved stones, not just 4 photos in a loop