No, they are called metallophones, glockenspiel is just one of them. Other common metallophones are the tubular bells and the vibraphone
That's changeing: in the ongoing SFC vs Vizio, SFC is just a regular user: https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html
Even FSF updated it's FAQ, that it's not true anymore: https://www.fsf.org/news/fsf-to-be-deposed-in-sfc-v-vizio-updates-relevant-faq-entry
Wikipedia has a long list about different language versions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dora_the_Explorer#Foreign_adaptations
Tldr: in non-english versions, usually the second language is English. Exceptions: Serbian and Irish teach Spanish, Kannada version teaches Hindi.
But it has a middle separator, perfect example of hostile architecture. For the uninitiated: the armrest in the middle's only function is to stop people lying on the bench. Homeless people can't sleep here, we finally solved the problem of homelessness, hurray!
The first image from the article:
I can already read the title of the page and see the favicon, so it actually doesn't show new information. If I accidentally move my mouse there it covers a big part of the page i'm looking at
His name was Almon Brown Strowger, not Stronger... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almon_Brown_Strowger
And there is no source for this story on wiki, it cites another wiki, where there isn't any more source either. So it's possible that this story is made up, or at least not exactly how it happened.
This video is very misleading.
- The reconstructions only affected some of the stones, which were already damaged or fallen, not all of them
- We have several photos from the 19th century, so you can compare the current state with the one before, the first reconstruction was in 1901
It's not some secret, you can read this on wikipedia, with more facts, e.g exact list of moved stones, not just 4 photos in a loop
Simply noone ever looked and it's not documented. And the api is locked to work only on google domains so it wasn't usable to anyone to accidentally notice what's going on.
Follow up question: How many other parts of the chromium codebase limited to work on (maybe other) specific domains?