jonesy

Quite a few of the farmers I've met purchase outright and claim depreciation via their taxes and avoid the interest, but I would assume many finance as well.

It's not that crazy when you see the cost of farm equipment, you own a decent sized tractor and you're a good way to $1,000,000 in assets already, add on a truck or two, general equipment around the farm, a few buildings and you could easily crest a million in assets. I would be surprised if there are that many private farmers with a million in liquid capital though, and realistically most farmers aren't going to be rich.

Fuck off, Trump.

You know NVIDIA is in trouble when Jensen ditches the stupid leather jackets for a suit and tie. The bubble can't burst soon enough.

Link to the interview: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A

This is bad for trans individuals but I think it's incorrect to say they're being revoked as in the screenshot it says a licence will be issued with their pre-transition gender. From the tweet it sounded like they were taking licences off people and leaving them unable to drive at all.

Ok but what about the studies showing they're unsafe? It's easy to be scared of scary sounding chemical names and allege they could cause cancer or infertility or whatever, but I am asking for the evidence where these substances have actually had a measurable or observable effect, whether it's cancer or infertility. As it is this article sounds like the same people on social media claiming that all our foods are killing us unless we only eat organic non-GMO.

I'm all for reducing harm from these toxic substances, but are there any studies showing these substances pose actual risk under normal use?

And yet they're all fascists.

What the fuck is this bullshit you're spouting.

An add on for exchange?

It's a miniature: https://forum.finescale.com/t/the-coast-guards-newest-interdiction-asset-the-ma-10j-seabolt-a-k-a-the-jayhawg/251694