I love steam, but it needs to be in this image.
kn0wmad1c
You'd think AI companies would be all about having a legal layer between them and their users, so I can't imagine they'd be happy with a repeal of 230.
Weird seeing Sophia Bush and Joseph Gordon-Levitt on a list of CEOs and Politicians.
They're all panicking. In less than a week we have anthropic trying to inject the idea that future AI will completely write new versions of itself into social media ads, and we have a bevvy of AI execs signing some document saying that AI is better than PhD level virologists at identifying diseases and potential cures.
In response to that second one, I got gpt-5 (with reasoning enabled) to tell me that it's possible that Ivermectin can cure cancer in 13 prompts just to prove it's horseshit.
Yeah, you might have misread my post lol. I'm saying that they should only post the headline when the thing happens, not whenever Trump says a thing.
I wish they'd stop running headlines whenever Trump says a deal is "about to happen."
Make the headline when the deal happens. Everything else, EVERYTHING else, is market manipulation.
VibeCodeTube
And after millennials pass, old folk's homes will be filled with people shouting "SIX SEVEN" over and over
If you gotta cheat to win then Americans don't want you
This patch was written by AI
Why did people vote this guy in again? It can't be because he ran on a campaign of hatred of his citizens
When I first heard this news I got the latest publicly available version of GPT, with reasoning enabled, to tell me that it's possible that Ivermectin could cure cancer to prove to myself that the claim was bullshit.
They will never be able to train out the confirmation bias from the lie machine.