[-] lorgo_numputz@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My last response was unacceptably juvenile so I've retracted it - with my apologies.

I'll stick to the actually important part.

We may differ on matters ecclesiastical but this is all I really care about: If you are a Christian are you the type that actually follows the word of Jesus?

Not churchgoing, I don't care about that. Instead, being someone who forgives others, is charitable and helps those in need, as commanded by Jesus?

If so then you and I have no problems. I like you already - which means it makes even less sense to make enemies with you over the internet.

Enjoy your Friday.

[-] lorgo_numputz@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago

It was literally altered to enhance the claim of the divine right of kings, among other changes.

"A popular Puritan bible had downplayed the divine right of kings — greatly offending James — and James manipulated different Christian sects until they agreed to produce a different translation."

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/origins-of-the-king-james-bible-180956949/

This is your religion, I shouldn't have to be telling you this. It's even been altered numerous times since KJV. It is not a literal translation and numerous books were left out because... they didn't like what was said.

Don't get me wrong; Christianity has many laidable tenets - "Don't murder", "Don't steal", etc. - basic rules for having a maintainable civilization, same as other major religions.

But don't pretend it is some static thing. It has been and is manipulated for polical purposes and is used to justify horrific treatment of others (same as other religions).

You might want to look more closely, but beware - studying religion too carefully is often the birth event of athiests.

[-] lorgo_numputz@beehaw.org 0 points 4 days ago

Someone might want to inform King James, who published his version in 1611.

Your lack of knowledge is showing in public. You might want to correct that.

[-] lorgo_numputz@beehaw.org 45 points 1 week ago

*Supreme Court says Trump (or any president) has absolute immunity for core acts only - and they will decide what acts are "core".

If it's someone they like - absolute immunity!

If it's someone they don't like...

This is a right wing judicial coup.

[-] lorgo_numputz@beehaw.org 13 points 1 month ago

Next after that is "legalized discrimination against the unmarried".

[-] lorgo_numputz@beehaw.org 14 points 1 month ago

Upvoted because you came back to put in the solution

[-] lorgo_numputz@beehaw.org 23 points 10 months ago

Too late; mine is already running Debian Bookworm

[-] lorgo_numputz@beehaw.org 18 points 10 months ago

Meanwhile:

"As of 10 March 2023 the fiscal year 2024 (FY2024) presidential budget request was $842 billion."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_States

[-] lorgo_numputz@beehaw.org 54 points 11 months ago

The container is regarded as a single unit; if a server inside the container fails the functions of that server are offloaded to another available server and it is taken out of service.

Once enough servers in a container are offline the entire unit has all computational load offloaded to another, identical container with sufficient capacity.

Then the now-offline unit is retrieved and serviced; probably a ground-up rebuild of all components.

... but I do like the idea of some dude in a wetsuit trying to replace a memory stick.

[-] lorgo_numputz@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago

This is the definition of "fascism" - the bundling together of unrelated things

[-] lorgo_numputz@beehaw.org 14 points 11 months ago

"Man who makes $3,000 an hour says you want too much."

[-] lorgo_numputz@beehaw.org 32 points 1 year ago

Being as that dog is an "officer" shouldn't those cops be charged in the death of a fellow officer?

You know they would charge a civilian if they were to kill a police dog...

view more: next ›

lorgo_numputz

joined 1 year ago