You can't talk about someone publicly for their public actions, that's too mean.
You can banish users for talking too much about what mods don't like, that's fair game.
You can't talk about someone publicly for their public actions, that's too mean.
You can banish users for talking too much about what mods don't like, that's fair game.
You mean the social credit score that makes it so if liberals disagree with you that you're shadow banned?
Or the obfuscation of what's allowed because it scans all images uploaded?
Or any of the horrid things Rimu does because he's never blamed for the poor chickens and horribly written code?
If someone has a PieFed.world or .social I just know they hate brown people and communists more than they hate fascists.
Why should he? He's the top dog, question him and you're removed.
When he actually get removed for breaking rules that the admins have said he needs to stop breaking, sure.
Too much work, gotta remove topics he doesn't like instead.
When Jordan was sick, his communities were nicer and easier to discuss things in. Wish he stayed sick so the mini admin couldn't silence topics he doesn't want to hear about.
PTB, as always with Jordan.
Honestly it might be, why else would they take half the things they get away with while saying other instances are guilty of doing it?
He doesn't even read the articles he links, you expect him to read usernames?
'ol Puggy banned you for calling out his bad faith while using evidence that contradicts him. Surely he hasn't done that before, and won't again.
God forbid a disabled person use a tool to aid themselves, might as well hate on TTS programs and motorized wheelchairs.
Watch, they'll claim they don't dislike the disabled person, but also will shit talk them more than an able person.
You could ask OP.
Somehow it effected the election, but also isn't important enough to bother with upholding international law.
The enemy is too strong and too weak.