Open your folder of shitposts and ...ugh... check for millipedes.
setsneedtofeed
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
How terrible.
The practice became the standard for nomenclature starting in the 1920s, gradually replacing other conventions such as naming based on the year of adoption (M1911, M1919, and M1903 as examples). This led to a lot of M1s in WW2 due to the timing of the nomenclature change.
I find it interesting that the .30-06 caliber is named for year of adoption, with the name of the standard cartridge in WW2 being M1.
You still have to go through the ATF permitting process, this just strips out the arbitrary cost that was stuck in the original NFA.
Very neat. I've been on the fence about a suppressor for a PCC so this tips it.
If three people all have different terminal medical conditions, which are currently making their state of life excruciating, and will kill them shortly, and there is one healthy person who can be killed and their organs repurposed to restore quality of life and stop the medical condition to all of those people then utilitarianism says it is moral to do that.
Any answer saying that it is wrong to do that shows there must be a factor beyond need in the determination.
Politicians seem very good at misunderstanding things when it suits them.
OPR rules but we both prefer to call everything by 40k names.
We did two quick back to back games, each games going after three objectives. I was playing with Necrons with a simple list of a leader, two scarab swarms (thought of and modeled as grey goo swarms) and five warriors with default guns. He had Orks with a highly upgraded boss, two groups of grots, three commandos, and three shoota boyz.
The first match was a loss and the second was a tie for the Necrons. I discovered right away that if I want to fight against Orks I need to invest in weapons with more shots, as each warrior only had 1 shot per round, which was not nearly enough to meaningfully depopulate the Ork team fast enough to keep them from touch the objectives.
0
U.S. Army National Guard soldiers secure area during annual training in Macon, Missouri, June 11, 2025.[1000x750]
(files.catbox.moe)
Full description: U.S. Army National Guard soldiers secure the area in preparation for a wet-gap crossing during annual training in Macon, Missouri, June 11, 2025. Securing the area ensures safe movement and supports the successful execution of the wet-gap crossing operation. (U.S. Army National Guard photo by Sgt. Kathiline Hogan)
I still find Civil War Generals 2 to be a really fun and challenging game. The visuals are still perfectly readable and charming.
Isn't is supposed to be is.
[US] Any suspect that says "Am I free to go?" during an interview where they haven't been Mirandized, and then if they are free to go leaves immediately.
Or if they are not free to go and Mirandized "I demand a lawyer." and "I am asserting my right to silence." and nothing else. Playing cute games in an "interview" so you can get off some zingers at the cops is at best not going to make your situation worse. Very likely though, the longer you talk, the worse it will get. Therefore any technique that is giving up your right to silence and council is sub-optimal.
This footage doesn't catch the public eye as often because it isn't spicy. It's just boring. You want to be boring because the cops who booked you are not the right people to be spinning your side of the story to.
India and Pakistan still staring at eachother as every country around them disappears.
view more: next ›
Some bombs, like the BLU-107 do exactly that.