skeptomatic

What the fuck have you done there, shooter?

Of you pay rent on credit, you should move into a cardboard box. I would.

LOL 😆
This is exactly correct.
When I was on reddit I used to get pissed that a topic worth some discussion would get railroaded by some dipshits aside-personal- experience-or-pedantism.
Turns out, it happens here.
And the downvotes too, apparently.

If you can't run a machine at home then you can't self-host. You're welcome to cloud-host though.

You make a good point.

It'll never happen, as nice as it sounds.
So I'm Canadian and we have separatists in, now 2 provinces.
Whether the latest is a conservative US psy-op, is up for debate. But that is probably part of it.
The Quebec separatists have been angry for the total of my lifetime and being from BC I've mostly ignored their plight of "different culture" but I never wanted to lose that chunk of the country and to me it's part of the greater Canadian culture.
The Alberta "separatists" are different, they are more like traitors.
Citing stats like, "Alberta (oil and gas province, the "Texas" of Canada) contributes more in equalization payments to other Canadians provinces!", which is true, as a total sum.
But the morons don't understand that equalization payments are taken from federal taxes in a bracketed tax system, so it just means on average, Albertans are richer. The rich they cry that they're not getting fair share...
Epitome of greed.
They believe because they were simply born there, moved there, that all the mineral and oil and gas profits belong to them. They're even more idiotic to believe the producers will share these profits with them.
They're not taking that away from our country, and it's worth going to war over. I think California would end up falling into the same situation of belief, though reversed between conservative and left-of-conservative views.
They'd go to war over it. So bit of a dangerous play.

Yo don't accept any neck-collars from strangers.

TUIF!

Straw-man argument bud. You may as well be house press secretary. You said it yourself. "Its inherently undemocratic and unethical to do less work someone [else]."
An while you're not technically correct about that either, the person you're describing that did no work is the one who sells their bathwater in this meme.
Come on... I know you can do it.. Your brain only has little bit more to go and you'll get it.

I can understand when one might be upset about the state of the world. Who isn't, eh? Comrade?
But no, your 100% hypethetical revelation that those people must inherently mistreat or underpay their staff, without any other context is a ridiculous leap. There is no question who adds more value, because of the way value is added. It is the way it is, because of the way it is.
Lawers can be skeezy.
Tech startup bros can be skeezy.
Hookers can be skeezy.
The care worker that takes care of your kids, could be skeezy. They are individuals. There will always be those people.
The professions are not inherently evil. There would be a version of them in any type of society whether it be fascist, socialist, communist, capitalist, or otherwise.
And they should always need to be performed open and honestly enough to have public approval of the processes.
There also will always be some form of prostitution.
But that can be done in a back alley.
And that's why it doesn't have much as much value.

"How about you explain how it's not sexist?"
Because if it was a guy who chose to be a stay at home dad and his bread-winner-wife divorced him and he cried about it on the internet, I'd also say he'd get child support and alimony.
Give your balls a tug.