theneverfox

joined 2 years ago
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 6 days ago

They also need clearance, they're supposed to have like 15' free above them and a couple feet on each side

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 6 days ago

Capitalism isn't the same thing as free trade, we're talking about literal individual markets. It could be a free market, the lord could be involved with workshops and give them exclusive rights, it could be a guild system, or he might just let the people do whatever

As for the means of production in the service industry... It's the building, the fryers, the computers, the agreements with suppliers or customers... some of these things are more abstract, but if you swap out the people, anything that's still there

Keep in mind, supply chains were pretty simple back then. You didn't make shovels, you have a local blacksmith who takes in iron and makes what you ask for. But everything is done at the prerogative of the lord, if he decides you need to make something you do it, if he decides you're overcharging he can set your prices, maybe you get ordered to take on apprentices

Think of the town as another resource - the lord gets more taxes the better the local economy is, but can also meddle in it however they like

Does the smith own the smithy? Kind of, but you could also say the smithy kinda owns the smith and the town owns the smithy and lord owns the town

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 8 points 1 week ago

You first. We're not on board with any of this

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sorry, I don't think I understand what you're trying to say

If you want free markets without capitalism - this literally existed

What are the means of production? Machines that weave thread into cloth. Machines that weave cotton fibers into thread. The land that grows the cotton. The people that harvest the cotton. The land itself

The was something that money could not buy, until it could. That's the line

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago

Pretty much. I love technology, but honestly I'd be happier and healthier in a forest

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago

Well, NYC has way too many policemen. Maybe they can turn that on the feds

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

You mean walks like a goose

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

To address your first point, you go into the bazaar, and you buy a shirt vs another shirt. The lord owns the cotton fields, they both come from the same place but have different prices and different quality/traits - that's a free market. The raw materials belong to the lord, but what you do with it is up to the artisan

You're trying to cut the difference between raw materials and value added - that's the murky difference between mercantilism and capitalism

Remember, there was an age where shipping iron to a town was how farmers got tools - mercantilism is about raw materials in and out, once things get complicated it doesn't make sense

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago

Right? It just doesn't even require explanation. People know what you're talking about immediately

It's a concept we all know missing a word, and people just get it instantly. I've had to repeat it slowly, but everyone gets it

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think you understand.

Socialism isn't on the table. We're so incredibly far from that. Let me know when the revolution is coming and I'll be there for it... Until then we very real issues that we can make a bit better. Not good - we're totally fucked - but we can make things less horrible

There's a genocide in progress. We're going to go through a depression. We can tea party the Democrats to be more progressive... There's no time to build up something new

I can't impress on you enough how many people are going to die

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 0 points 1 week ago (8 children)

You spelled "take" wrong

It matters because the party isn't the people, it's infrastructure. It's buildings, it's support staff, it's mailing lists and payment processors

It's getting a special (often unfair) place on the ballot in all 50 states. It's 50 (often flawed) primary processes that follow local laws

And it's a banner. Not one people like, but it's one banner. A banner that theoretically stands for democracy and the common man

The left is not organized. Do we rally behind a fresh, ideologically pure banner? Which one? How long to work out which group is the best? How long until we can build up that infrastructure?

Fuck that. Winning is what matters.

The people are on our side for now, there's so much anger and energy. How long until they adjust to the new normal and go back to refusing to believe in a better world?

We have a chance right now. The next 18 months. In one sweep we can take a tattered banner and get in control - before people get cold feet. While they're still just screaming for someone to stop Trump.

We can use the momentum to unfuck our democracy once we take control, but we can't get distracted. There's no room for purity or lofty ideals. We have to take what is offered and exploit every opportunity. We have to use the system against itself.

We have to win. Now. Or we all die

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 8 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Why? The party is dead. They're just holding onto their seats

Take the seats, you take it all. Keep the infrastructure of the party, keep the name recognition and the data they have, and replace the members

It's happening already - Hoggs funneled money into Mumdani's primary even as they try to ratfuck him out...

view more: ‹ prev next ›