[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

No but I would like to know how possible it is for what I believe to be the most humorous outcome to occur.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Does deadlock have tie games?

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The major breakthrough here is a method for interfacing brain like organic tissue (that they had already developed) with electronic components. They’re using the brain tissue in a similar fashion as a neural network based AI and training it to relay signals to electronic components in response to certain stimuli, if I understood the article correctly; I skimmed quite a bit though.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Pointing out a failed promise doesn’t necessarily imply you wanted them to follow through with it. For example, noting that Trump failed to get Mexico to pay for his wall doesn’t mean I actually wanted him to succeed.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

I feel like this little project is gonna go about as well for them as Rapture did in Bioshock.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Your inner child is showing

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Then run it in a container under a better distribution if you desperately need to put neofetch on your HTPC. Or run the other distro in a container under libreelec since I’m pretty sure it supports them.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

It tracks anonymous statistics, without my express consent, for the benefit of a third party. I do not care if it exists to replace cookies, because I’m not even convinced that cookies need to exist at all anymore. What utility do they provide to the actual person using the browser that can’t be accomplished through some other more modern API? If the only functionality left to replace is tracking people then maybe just deprecate them and move on.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

what do you mean? people living in the mountains of NC definitely had flood insurance.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Telegram had credibility. It was being used by journalists to protect sources.

You can extend trust to individuals but do not apply that to companies or organizations if you care at all about what they’re doing with what you give them. Not everyone has some mythical tech privacy wizard on call to give them perfect advice every time they open an account on an app or website.

Even client side encryption is not infallible. The algorithm you use will eventually be crackable and probably sooner than you think. Nothing lasts forever.

The most foolproof way to ensure something remains private is to not put it on the internet at all.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If you can read and understand the code, sure. Otherwise you’re still just extending trust to someone perhaps less reputable than even the corporations who are dying to sell you out. For example, the back door some mysterious contributor slipped into xz recently.

My recommendation is to live life as if privacy on the internet did not exist, because it doesn’t.

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 17 points 6 days ago

Never trust a third party to keep your shit private. Especially if privacy is their main selling point.

view more: next ›

underisk

joined 1 year ago