1234
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 68 points 4 months ago

Oh puh-lease!

Employees don't risk anything except their career, livelihoods, and homes.

Investors take enormous risks, like a small amount of their vast wealth, and maybe even risk losing a controlling interest in the board. If they really fuck up, they might even risk not being allowed to be a CEO again for a few years.

But go on, try to convince me again that employees deserve a bigger share...

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

You know, it always amazes me how people equate layoffs with losing livelihoods here. Is that how it is in America? Seems so alien, when where I live, being fired (without cause) would be somewhere between a non-event and a pleasant break using the severance pay.

[-] CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Often, yes. Outside of more senior level white collar careers, severance is often not guaranteed upon separation here. In many states, “Right to Work” labor laws enable an employer to terminate an employee for nearly any reason. To make matters worse, our health insurance is provided as a benefit by our employers, so losing your job not only means you lose your source of income, but also your means of keeping yourself healthy and getting care should you need it.

And in many cases, even if you do receive severance, the company determines what your separation package includes, and the calculations used to determine the value is kept behind closed doors and obscured from the employee. The packages are presented as non-negotiable, even though they aren’t, and employees being let go are often pressured to sign the agreement in a very short window or risk having the offer of severance rescinded. Often what is offered is a pittance, but generally Americans don’t push back against it. It’s a “better than nothing, I guess” situation.

So yeah - being laid off is a tremendously stressful and life altering experience here for the vast majority of the working and middle class.

[-] Promethiel@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Smallest of corrections because the bastards are multiple flavors of bastards: '

'At will employment' is the "fire you for any or no reason so long as we don't transparently enough do it for/to the small list of protected reasons or qualifying personal attributes for protected class status.

The sick joke is that you can terminate your employment 'At will' too, unlike those other work contract places isn't that liberating!

That one is in all of the US.

'Right to work' would be the anti-union version which applies to some states that have gone extra harder than the other ones to prevent the evil evil unions. Plenty of folks better suited than me to explain more around Lemmy.

The sick joke with that one is that you have "the right to work" even when that evil evil union is doing collective bargaining outside with funky signs!

Person who replied to who I replied to; the list of shit Americans ought to be focusing on legislating for is intentionally multi-faceted and obtuse; do you really think such simple insight beyond what you would consider obvious? Our great thinkers aren't dumb, they're oppressed.

[-] Bgugi@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

To double down on the "um actually..."

Right to work laws guarantee the benefits of a union while also removing the requirement to pay for that union. The goal is to have enough people try to get a free ride with the union that it collapses under it's own weight.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I don't think that your great thinkers are dumb. I think they are ignored by the masses. As dumb as your voting system is, it is still a functioning voting system. And yet the only change it seems to bring is what the level of intolerance and hate is in your country.

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

The packages are presented as non-negotiable, even though they aren’t

How are they negotiable? What can the employee threat with if they don't get a better package?

[-] CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Whether or not you win additional concessions depends on what information or knowledge you have about an organization that could prove damaging in some respect, and whether or not you can afford legal representation. But it is negotiable.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Really sounds like you should be focusing on having legislated 3 months salary severance like we do instead of thinking about communist revolutions that have zero chance to succeed in the short and medium term (sorry if you don't think about that, but feels like two thirds of Lemmy do).

Note that we do have a 3 month probationary period where you can be fired for any reason without severance to ensure employers are not afraid to hire people and often the first employment contract is only for a year so the employer has the option to let you go after a year without severance. An extension has to be indefinite though, so it is like an extended probation.

Of course, health insurance is paid by the state while you are involuntarily unemployed and you get unemployment benefits for a limited time after being fired (though that may only be after 3 months when the severance runs out, I am not quite sure how exactly that works).

[-] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

The problem is, is that our legislation system was built with the intention of stability and to make any changes, all sides would have to somewhat agree. At some point it unfortunately has drifted off course and with everyone polarized other over whose side is right or wrong, it became a game of endless tic-tac-toe of keeping the other side from "winning"

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Depends. I'm an experienced programmer. It has never taken me more than a month of casual searching to land the next gig, no relocation.

But if you're a factory worker in bum fuck nowhere, where the factory is the town, well, layoffs are going to be catastrophic for most, particularly since relocating would almost certainly be to a more expensive area.

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
1234 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

5185 readers
3302 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS