213
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by qaz@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

EDIT:

Context: This is an archived article from 1939 by "Foreign Affairs".

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/germany/1939-04-01/will-hitler-save-democracy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 month ago

I think I get the point they're trying to make, democracy had become complacent and Hitler gave it a common threat and enemy, but in retrospect... Didn't work out that great now, did it

[-] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's difficult to quantify, but I think there is a compelling argument to be made - just off of my head, WW2 led to:

  • the fall of German autocracy/restoration of German democracy (though Hitler did kinda break that one in the first place)
  • Italian and Japanese democracy
  • redistribution of wealth/power in Britain
  • the 4th french republic
  • alignment of the European democracies
  • establishment of the UN
[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 month ago
  • end of the British empire
  • eventual formation of the EU to replace the League of Nations

But also

  • invention of the nuclear bomb
  • by extension, escalation of the cold war
  • numerous coups against democratic leaders and proxy wars due to it
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 20 points 1 month ago

Italian and Japanese democracy

And, albeit on a longer timeframe, Taiwanese and South Korean democracy.

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 6 points 1 month ago

It worked fine at the time, the problem is that all of that motivation to defend democracy was artificial, and slowly faded from the public as the war faded into the past.

this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
213 points (99.5% liked)

196

16032 readers
2829 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS