171
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
171 points (91.7% liked)
politics
22127 readers
154 users here now
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.
Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.
!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
If we’re voting for a team and the guy in front of it isn’t that important, it should be no problem to replace that guy with someone who isn’t dragging the rest of the team down.
So you would support replacing Trump with a different figurehead and keeping his team?
This is the opposite of a good argument.
I can't imagine a more disqualifying statement than "the real problem with the George Bush administration was Bush, his cabinet was fine"
He was a literally lightning rod who would soak up media attention by golfing and throwing out first pitches while his cabinet dragged us into multiple colonial wars.
This is the problem with satire is it can't stack up to a genuine dogshit take like this. Like I couldn't even sarcastically come up with a dumber statement.
You need to listen to Blowback, and you'll fucking hate his team of war criminals.
If he's a liberal no he won't.
Man, you must really hate Arabs.
That's an awful lot of fucking words to say "actually I thought about it and yes it's ok when my guy does it but bad when they do it"