373
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Many people choose to live in neighborhoods with an HOA and I don't see why they should be forbidden to do that. "I know what's good for you better than you do" ought to require a high burden of proof.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

I know what's good for you better than you do

Isn't that kind of the definition of what an HOA does?

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

Technically an HOA is grassroots community derived governance to establish and maintain shared interests related to the neighborhood.

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago

Nowadays most of them are created by land developers, which often maintain complete control for many years after the first houses are sold in the community. Nothing grassroots about them when they are founded and run by a private company.

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 4 points 4 months ago

If this is what they actually were, I would be for them.

This is almost never what they actually are.

I am 100% positive there are some shrinking.number of good HOAs out there.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

This, also You only hear about bad HOAs

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Not necessarily. I know a guy who lives in a rural area and still somehow managed to find a house with an HOA, because he wanted access to shared amenities. Beyond that, HOA rules would ideally be like an agreement that I won't be a bad neighbor to you if you won't be a bad neighbor to me. It does seem like HOA boards attract petty people, but only the very worst will get in the news while the normal ones quietly do their thing.

(Also, it appears that the lemonade stand in the article wasn't actually violating the HOA rules.)

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I still have compassion for those who live a HOA and then go on to complain because choosing to live there is a complex decision involving many factors. In some parts of the country, there might be no options to practically avoid a HOA.

“I know what’s good for you” is precisely the ethos of the HOA. I’d have less compassion if housing wasn’t such a tight commodity. In that case, it’s a choice. But I think in the current market it doesn’t always feel like one.

I don’t think an outright ban is the right answer either.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 9 points 4 months ago

All fine and dandy until HOAs are all that's available and you're paying $100s per month to one of the handful of major developers in the country that built the neighborhood and coincidentally still controls the HOA. Ever been to Florida?

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

Fuck no, who would willingly go there? Being born there, stuck there, I get it. But traveling/vacationing? My God

[-] nomous@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Worst drivers I've ever dealt with were in FL.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
373 points (98.2% liked)

News

23409 readers
3052 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS