1958
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 118 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What's that old quote? "A lie can make it around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes", or something like that? I believe that was pre-internet too.

It also happens with politics. I constantly see provocative headlines get lots of attention in one circle, and then the later corrections only get passed around in the opposite circle, if at all.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 21 points 4 months ago

Look at just yesterday. One clickbait site said Beyonce was going to perform at the dnc, and by the time the truth and correction made it around it was already past time

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

We desperately need a return of journalistic ethics and bland, just-the-facts news.

[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

This is why in prefer NPR and BBC

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago

I wouldn't call those the most reliable. Better than some

[-] UmeU@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

What’s more reliable than NPR?

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Nothing is reliable that's the problem. NPR is a propaganda machine. There are worse ones to be far

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Critical thinking and media literacy. Just 2 days ago I heard NPR try to gaslight me that Gaza wasn’t a genocide.

[-] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I'm so sick of these bloodthirty zionist bastards running everything

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 14 points 4 months ago

Plus those corrections only show up as a footnote on articles without it being altered or removed. Its laughable.

[-] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 4 months ago

That's weird. Ideally you should put it right next to the title, that there has been an addendum and the following might be incorrect/outdated.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 6 points 4 months ago

That depends on what your goal is, I think

[-] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 2 points 4 months ago

I'd consider the goal be to:

  1. Keep the original article for historical and reference purposes
  2. Make sure that anyone who only cared to read the first sentence, didn't leave with confident misinformation.
[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

Your goals are too honest for mass media 😅

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 months ago

Its even worse in science. Lots of crazy headlines that are later debunked quietly

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

those headlines can also be debunked loudly and yet, anti-vaxxers still exist, somehow

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

I wasn't talking about vaccinations. I was talking about fusion and other buzzy topics.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 4 months ago

Generally that's news media misconstruing science.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago

Which directly impacts funding

That's the big issue. If a project doesn't have big headlines frequently it is killed.

[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

I think more likely is that the news outlets need the revenue from clicks, and are willing to trade their reputation to get them. Accurate science journalism doesn't pay, capitalism is a race to the bottom.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
1958 points (98.5% liked)

memes

10721 readers
3437 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS