1283
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] guillem@aussie.zone 88 points 2 months ago

Gen X ignored again, with which we are okay though.

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 60 points 2 months ago
[-] Irinir@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago
[-] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

You know he's never going to give it to you.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Bot you just know that he's never gonna give you up

[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 months ago

Or let you down. Or run around, as a matter of fact.

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 3 points 2 months ago
[-] klemptor@startrek.website 9 points 2 months ago
[-] dumbass@leminal.space 3 points 2 months ago
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

I was gonna post that but then I was, like, whatever.

[-] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Silent as per usual

[-] toddalon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

Exactly the comment I was looking for. Tip of the hat to you.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Only thing that isn't okay is to mangle your sentence to conform to the obsolete "never end a sentence with a preposition because some old fogey said so hundreds of years ago" rule ๐Ÿ˜›

[-] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

I'm ok with ignoring this rule. Most of us do anyway. While we're at it, can we also put "never split the infinitive" on the chopping block?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[-] guillem@aussie.zone 6 points 2 months ago

ESL here, what would have been the more natural way?

[-] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

It's an invented prescriptionist rule that was imported from studying Latin. You can completely ignore it and you'll get more natural sounding language.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Same here. There's probably other ways too, but personally I'd probably have gone with "and we're okay with that" or "and that's fine/okay with us". Just flows more like naturally IMO.

BTW, in spite of the tongue in cheek way in which I said it, I meant no personal ill will towards you. Just the rule and its tyranny ๐Ÿ˜‰

[-] monotremata@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

It's the "with which we are okay" that sounds a little stilted. Most speakers would probably phrase that part of the sentence as "which we're okay with." It's just because "okay with" is so common that it almost feels like a transitive form of the verb "to be okay," so splitting apart sounds odd.

Note that there's already a different transitive verb "okay" which means "approve" or "authorize," as in "the boss okayed your plan to use the forklift," implying that the person doing this has authority or control over whether the thing happens. "I'm okay with it" by contrast typically means something like "I have no control over it but it also doesn't trouble me." "Unfazed by" (spelled in this way, not related to "phase") would be a similar expression.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

What you wrote was fine. Some people don't like that sentence structure for stupid reasons

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
1283 points (98.0% liked)

Memes

45884 readers
1674 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS