287
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 55 points 2 months ago

Weather control claims are firmly in the weird category.

[-] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 46 points 2 months ago

“We can change the weather”

Also

“Climate change isn’t real”

Pick a fucking lane lady.

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago
[-] qprimed@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago

if we could actually get them to say this we would be making headway.

[-] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Unironically this is something I heard in Texas during the freeze a couple years ago

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

She seems the type to think all the lanes belong to her and fuck you, get out of her way!

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

Careful, since weather and climate are the same to them, they’ll say the democrats are intentionally heating up the climate so they have an excuse to take away their beloved coal rolling trucks.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

well. there are some weather control technologies that actually exist. Like seeding rain for crops. it's fairly common in most places these days.

but there's no way to precipitate a hurricane or stop one.

[-] Baggins@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

“About 3 minutes and ding its done!”

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

And this is the problem with the way she worded it and everyone blowing it off as just weird instead of straight up fucking stupid.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

well she didn't mean any of the rain precipitators. She meant, they actively controlled hurricanes. It's both weird and fucking stupid.

Actually. I wonder what would happen if you took a microwave array, of appropriately huge power, and directed it at the hurricane's flanks, you know. to heat up the water on that side. maybe make some wind. I bet you could steer it "some"....

(Mexico, if you're reading this, I absolutely won't try this, if you send me your best street taco recipe.)

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

She didn’t know what she means. I bet she’s heard of SA rain control in some off handed meeting and just strung a line of bullshit from that. Then weasel worded this so she could fall back on that.

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
287 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2198 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS