369
submitted 2 weeks ago by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago

A 13-year-old with autism was arrested after his autism sparked fear.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

His autism didn't spark fear...saying the school would blow up if anyone looked in his backpack sparked fear. He should not have been arrested but c'mon, if a kid I just met said that to me I'd call the front office, too.

he told his teacher he didn’t want anyone to look in his backpack [...] When the teacher asked why, Ty responded, “Because the whole school will blow up,”

Arresting him was overreacting. Perceiving his words as a threat was not

[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 55 points 2 weeks ago

He wasn’t wrong. Someone looked in his bag and the whole situation got blown up out of proportion over a bunny

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl -3 points 2 weeks ago

Are we doing puns...? I feel like you're doing puns. This was an incendiary situation...

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

You don't gotta explode about it. Sheesh.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago

Sure but it wasn't his autism that sparked fear

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 22 points 2 weeks ago

If they actually thought he had a bomb in his backpack, why did they open it there in the school?

[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Some kid randomly saying that and you don't know him, ok. But the school was aware he's autistic, so why did they suddenly forget?

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I am saying the admins acted poorly but the teacher was justifiably scared.

The teacher, who had only known Ty for one day, called a school administrator

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

saying the school would blow up if anyone looked in his backpack sparked fear

If you can't tell a serious threat from mouth noises coming from a 13 year old autistic boy, then I guess its good you presumably don't work with children.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You're right, no 13 year old autistic boy has ever made a serious threat! It's always totally obvious if threatening words from a stranger should be taken seriously or not. Teachers are also always given the full background on every kid in their classroom without exceptions so they should have ignored protocol when hearing a kid say their backpack is going to blow up.

How could I forget that every single kid with malice in their heart fits the brooding edgelord mold from Columbine and that having autism totally precludes violent intentions?

Teachers DO NOT GET PAID ENOUGH for that. And even if they were paid fairly, their job isn't to assess and handle bomb threats.

The teacher was 100% right to call the administrators. The administrators were 100% wrong to do anything more than gently educate him on his word choice.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah - calling the admin was definitely the right thing to do. Even involving the police as reasonable (the whole world would be jumping all over the teachers and admin if they ignored it and something happened).

But goddamn everything after that is a clusterfuck. This law is the perfect example of "well meaning but stupid" legislation that has side effects that were entirely foreseeable but somehow a "shock" to the people who voted for it.

[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago
[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

being disabled involves the same sort of stigmas

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
369 points (97.9% liked)

News

23422 readers
2629 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS