689
submitted 2 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Stephen King announced his departure from X (formerly Twitter), calling the platform “too toxic” and urging followers to join him on Threads.

King has frequently clashed with X owner Elon Musk over verification charges and political disputes, including Musk’s support for Donald Trump.

Other entities, including The Guardian, German football club St Pauli, and actor Jamie Lee Curtis, have also left the platform, citing concerns over toxic content, misinformation, and hate speech.

Rival platforms like Threads and Bluesky are gaining traction, with Bluesky reporting nearly 15 million users globally.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 65 points 2 weeks ago

Anything but Mastodon/Activitypub, eh? These fellas rlly love sucking on corporate dicks, don't they

[-] fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 2 weeks ago

It really boggles my mind the cognitive dissonance of everybody constantly complaining about corporations screwing them over, then refusing to use the obvious solution to their problems.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 67 points 2 weeks ago

I can absolutely believe that an old guy like Stephen King has never even heard of Mastodon. It's not like there's a big Mastodon PR team being paid to advertise its existence.

[-] fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago

I can totally believe that he didn't know about mastodon, but even Bluesky is like a reasonable platform. Threads... I see literally no upside to using threads. It's on a timer from the beginning to turn into another X. Just look at how long Facebook has been a cesspool of Nazi propaganda.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I've been using Bluesky for a couple of days and I honestly think it's okay. I'm not big on microblogging in general, but I can follow just my long-distance friends and no one else and only have to see other people's crap if one of my friends shares it. So that's nice. My only issue with Mastodon was one of the same ones I had with Twitter- if I followed people I was interested in but didn't know, my feed just got too busy for me.

But that seems to work for a lot of people?

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

Mastodon is like Costco. They don’t advertise much.

[-] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Someone should tell him

[-] Jeffool@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Good point. Does anyone know an animator? I'll write some promotional material.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Or sometimes the PR team of niche and new tech are a bunch of insufferable twats.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 9 points 2 weeks ago

Look, this time Leopards Multiglobal, Inc will not eat our faces!

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

We're here for fun. Celebs are on social media as part of their brand. It's them doing business, and they're going to use what the feel will reach the largest audience with the least effort on their part, and something with corporate backing likely has customer support for moderation, hacking, and whatever else. They're not here for a digital revolution, they're here to keep their name and income stream out there.

I imagine it's the same reasoning why a business will pay for Red Hat when they could run Linux for free. It may or may not be the best option, but they feel it offers tangible benefits.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is absolutely correct. And these businesses are typically paying employees to manage these social accounts so there is financial risk with choosing one that's not going to result in revenue. Why market on a platform with no audience or backing?

I'm not saying I like it, but that is indeed how things work.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yup, I just replied to another comment, what's so bad about having a place that's just regular people? I enjoy having my comments actually read here and getting to know some of you to some level. I'd lose interest in this place if it turned into new Twitter. I can't compete with Taylor or Beyonce or whoever the flavor of the week is. We can have both platforms if we so choose, so why wreck one for the sake of another?

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

Couldn't one person just copy/paste each thing they post on one platform, to the others? At least until it's clear which platform will be twitter's successor? They're all free, so why not hedge? Do you really need to hire another person if you want to have another social media account on a different platform?

[-] myopic_menace@reddthat.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Although federated social media has the "chicken or egg" problem with content and attracting users, I'm content with places like Lemmy and Mastodon staying the small size they are right now for a little longer.

Sure, I definitely miss content from other platforms from time to time. But I think your comment about businesses and celebrities rings true. I'm happy to be clear of the grifters and influencers for as long as possible.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly. For all the things that typically get complained about: one product trying to do everything, people coming in to monetize things, feeling like your voice gets lost in oceans of comments, it seems like people forget that when it comes to the Fediverse.

The same guys that spent all that time being mad about potential federation with Threads are mad that this place isn't going to be Twitter 2.0? It doesn't make sense to me. If you want ads and celebs, go see them at their place. Keeping this just place us regular people doesn't need to be a negative. There's room for both.

[-] fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well, if the corporatized platforms all went to federated instances, it'd be a lot easier to pack up and move to a different platform, or fix the existing platform by choosing different instances. It would make those platforms better and we would probably still have our own spaces either using different protocols, or different clusters of instances who only federate with each other.

Threads being federated is not them actually trying to be federated, but trying to EEE the open competition, and I think that is more of a threat to us than people joining mastodon.

Edit: I'm realizing that I'm kind of contradicting myself here lol

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

That was my initial gripe with the other commenters. Nobody ever likes the one-size-fits-all software platforms. It's always got too much of what you dont want and not enough what you do. All these social platforms are free., why mix them when we can use the ones we want. Installing Lemmy and Bluesky apps is easy, but if you later decide you dont want Bluesky, you just uninstall. If all those people would come here, you'd have to get people to defederate or you have to pack up and leave for another instance. That seems a lot more hassle to me than just using a second app.

Lemmy is great as-is. Let's be proud of it. It gives me a day's worth of content as it stands now....probably more than I actually should use it already!

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Why wouldn't they want to join this place and be called bootlickers for moderate policy take by some screaming communist from a .ml? Sounds like a great time to me! Getting yelled at by flying squid twice a day is a joy!

This place is primarily made up of a ton anarchist and communists screaming and spreading their own bullshit. Centrist and and less progressive folks are commonly shouted at, called bootlickers, or Nazis for relatively centrrist views.

Mods and admins are far less balanced than reddit or pre x Twitter as well. LWis about to as close to center as you can get and it's quite obvious.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago

What do you mean when you say "this place"? Because Lemmy is decentralized, and it can vary wildly by instance and community.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's still small, so the whole platform still feels like one of the larger reddit subs. The same people show up everywhere, and if you want to create a niche community, you'll go months without seeing any posts.

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

LW. The only instance really even close to supporting commercial needs. I may be missing a few snale ones but LWis the most "normal" for lack of a better description.

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Lemmyworld, the instance you are commenting on.

[-] USSEthernet@startrek.website 2 points 2 weeks ago

StarTrek.website recently defederated from hexbear and we got called names too. I'd say our instance is pretty well balanced and small.

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'll check it out!

[-] Sl00k@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago

Mastodon is a far worse experience than Twitter and Bluesky, it's not a 1:1 transition.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Attitudes like yours certainly isn't attracting any new users...

[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Sure, but he's not wrong. I'll never get why people love to rail again corporations and enshittification while using those sites.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

There is a slight learning curve to Mastodon. Is there a method for verifying accounts? Honest question there. I signed up for Mastodon years ago but I used it as often as I used Twitter which is to say never.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
689 points (97.6% liked)

News

23422 readers
2636 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS