53
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
53 points (100.0% liked)
technology
23313 readers
206 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Doesn’t all radar travel at light speed by definition? Because it’s radio waves? Which travel at light speed?
this article has a better explanation
https://interestingengineering.com/military/submarine-detection-at-light-speed-china
as @D61@hexbear.net pointed out, the virtual source is what's moving at near the speed of light. the virtual source is the sky. the actual source is on a ship. it sounds like they're generating an interference pattern and reflecting that off the atmosphere to produce extremely low frequency electromagnetic waves capable of penetrating the water column. it's the group velocity of the wave packet that's moving at close to the speed of light, or something like that.
I was about to post the same thing ;)
Slightly poorly written article title.
The thing moving at the speed of light is the emitting source.
That makes more sense. The concept is pretty cool, and difficult to explain. My first thought was that the article was written by someone who wasn't very scientifically literate, but the author does actually seem to have the background to understand this stuff.
cis only achieved in a vacuum...No I had the same thought lol I was like what kind of shitty budget radar waves DON'T operate at light speed?
Light speed is light speed, and c is c. They coincide in a vacuum. Light always travels at light speed.
Thesis: waves
Antithesis: particles
Synthesis: some nerd stuff I dunno
It's a little more complicated than that. Like, yes light is always traveling at c. But as it moves through a medium, it interacts with that medium. It gets refracted, absorbed, re-emitted, diffracted, etc: All things that add time to the photons' travels, lowering its observed velocity.
That is essentially what I was saying. The observed effect of light (the group velocity of light) travels at the speed of light. That is essentially to say, for everyday purposes like transmission of signals, the speed of light is the (observed) speed of light. In a vacuum, this is c, but in other media, the speed of light is slower than c, so c might be better referred to as the speed of causality.
Edit: I will mention that some peg c to the speed of light in any medium, and refer to the speed of light in a vacuum as c₀. This usage is endorsed in official SI literature.
Ya I was just being a goof lol. Interesting about c vs c~0~ tho, never seen that usage before
shooting rubber balls in random directions and seeing if they bounce off something
The US military uses this system, but this is just so they can get away with throwing rubber balls at high speeds without it being an act of war