this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
455 points (98.1% liked)

World News

44311 readers
4229 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Canada has avoided the severe egg shortages and soaring prices seen in the U.S. due to differences in farming practices and regulations.

While avian flu has devastated large American egg farms, Canada’s smaller farms and tightly sealed barns have limited the impact.

The U.S.’s industrialized egg industry, driven by cost efficiency, is vulnerable to supply shocks when outbreaks occur.

Canada’s supply management system ensures stable production and restricts imports, keeping farms smaller. Meanwhile, U.S. consumers face continued egg price surcharges and supply pressures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] protist@mander.xyz 29 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Another major factor is that Canada raises more of their chickens indoors due to how cold it gets, significantly decreasing their risk of exposure to avian flu.

The US has way more free-range chickens, and free-range chickens are most at risk.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yes and no. Free range in America means "raised in a huge building and never seeing sunlight." Basically what separates them from cage free is that thousands of birds all share one giant cage instead of four birds to a cage inside the larger cage.

Pasture raised are the ones that get to go outside and eat bugs in the sunshine.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Free range vs pasture raised in America

Canada is a bit different in its designations. 'Free run' means they're in the barn and 'free range' means they have access outside the barn (weather permitting ofc).

[–] CanadaPlus 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, but to how much outdoor area? IIRC it's still pretty factory farm. Maybe you can get super-freerange eggs as well, but not at my local store.

Backyard hens are dope.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The chickens that are outside eating bugs in the sunshine are the most likely to catch avian flu due to exposure to wild birds 😕

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But if they do catch it, they're way less likely to spread it to a literal million other chickens, so there's that

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

they are more spread out, so less chance of getting h5n1, some brands use pasture, garden raised and they are less likely to be recalled for avian flu, of course these are more expensive too.

when you are super-crowded indoors, viruses spread more easily.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you have a source that free range chickens are less likely to get avian flu? Because in the article it mentions chickens that don't have contact with nature outside a facility are less likely to get it

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I remember when there was some .. what was it, hoof & mouth disease, or something, in the UK?

The Problem(tm), was that farms for these animals are crowded,

AND trades of animals were sooo quick, that by the time they clued-in that this was happening, many farms were infected,

& they weren't able to just identify all the now-infected farms, because that wasn't part of their national management system, apparently..

Remapping it to mega-chickenfarms,

I'd bet they've got specialist chick-producing-farms, & then the mega egg-farms, & that they trade with each-other ( replacing dead birds, if nothing else )

& the transactions are happening at such a pace, at national-scale,

that any infection which gains ground somewhere, can essentially "zerg rush" the entire-system, before the controls have a chance to clamp-down properly, AND many simply won't obey any clamp-down order anyways, because obeying law is unAmerican, culturally..

iow, it's in large part, a systems question.

The gestation-period for any illness makes trades that happen quicker-than-that systemically dangerous, when there's some highly-transmissible pathogen going 'round ( whether we know about it, or not ),

& same as you have to slow the trades-cycle of stock-markets to human-scale ( say 2-second intervals for recording trades ), in order to take the stock-market back from the millisecond-trade-algorithms,

you also have to batch the trades in infectable-farm-animals so as to make it more-difficult for transmissible pathogens to OWN a national-economy, but .. moneyarchy won't allow that management, of course..

In the UK case, there was a clear division into superspreader farms vs normal farms.

I'm presuming the same will be true in all farm-animals-industries, at scale.

( sorry for breaking this into pieces, while writing it, but braindamage: it's easier for me to understand the meanings when each piece is clear, by itself: it's my mental-equivalent to a wheelchair, perhaps : )

PS: I just realized..

Some farmers are trading-addicted: it's the "buzz" they get from the doing-deals, which they love sooo much..

I wonder if the superspreader sites were partly the result of that mode of operating a farm?

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

That's the rub.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

And they pick each other to death in those "free range" areas.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Yeah..

"horrible creatures", I was told by a former personal-scale chicken-farmer..

if human-nature & chicken-nature are related, then .. that would actually explain one hell of alot, tbh..

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

actually its overcrowding in farms too, they have indoor farms where its considered free range, but enough chickens to become crowded and you see dead chickens that are discovered til later.

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Not sure if it's still this way, but a documentary years ago described the ridiculous technicality that allowed a farm to call themselves free range. It was like a door that led outside to a 4 foot cube area shared by thousands and thousands of chicken. Basically enough room for like three chickens to spread their wings... If they happened to find the door, and it wasn't already crowded... And they were actually able to walk.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

I wish more people knew that information.

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ve seen tons of videos of people who actually free range their chickens, actually outside, and they’ve had no avian flu problems with their chickens. 🤔

[–] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

You've seen some videos of free range chickens that don't have avian flu and think that constitutes evidence that avian flu isn't a problem for free range chickens...?