this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
281 points (97.6% liked)

World News

44201 readers
3315 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Canada has avoided the severe egg shortages and soaring prices seen in the U.S. due to differences in farming practices and regulations.

While avian flu has devastated large American egg farms, Canada’s smaller farms and tightly sealed barns have limited the impact.

The U.S.’s industrialized egg industry, driven by cost efficiency, is vulnerable to supply shocks when outbreaks occur.

Canada’s supply management system ensures stable production and restricts imports, keeping farms smaller. Meanwhile, U.S. consumers face continued egg price surcharges and supply pressures.

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 14 points 8 hours ago

i'm kind of surprised us hasnt just been disregarding the avian flu and used the diseased chickens as if there was nothing wrong, that would fit with everything else going on

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 27 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

But perhaps the biggest difference is that egg farms in Canada are much smaller, so when one farm does suffer a flu outbreak, the effects are less far-reaching. The typical egg farm in Canada has about 25,000 laying hens, whereas many farms in the U.S. have well over a million. In effect, American farmers have put a lot more of their eggs in a relatively small number of baskets.

About what you would expect.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 16 points 9 hours ago

A million. Christ. Probably all caged living awful lives, poor things.

I have 2 backyard chickens and they are really happy. Fresh eggs every day.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 23 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Another major factor is that Canada raises more of their chickens indoors due to how cold it gets, significantly decreasing their risk of exposure to avian flu.

The US has way more free-range chickens, and free-range chickens are most at risk.

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

Not sure if it's still this way, but a documentary years ago described the ridiculous technicality that allowed a farm to call themselves free range. It was like a door that led outside to a 4 foot cube area shared by thousands and thousands of chicken. Basically enough room for like three chickens to spread their wings... If they happened to find the door, and it wasn't already crowded... And they were actually able to walk.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Yes and no. Free range in America means "raised in a huge building and never seeing sunlight." Basically what separates them from cage free is that thousands of birds all share one giant cage instead of four birds to a cage inside the larger cage.

Pasture raised are the ones that get to go outside and eat bugs in the sunshine.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

Free range vs pasture raised in America

Canada is a bit different in its designations. 'Free run' means they're in the barn and 'free range' means they have access outside the barn (weather permitting ofc).

[–] protist@mander.xyz 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The chickens that are outside eating bugs in the sunshine are the most likely to catch avian flu due to exposure to wild birds 😕

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

But if they do catch it, they're way less likely to spread it to a literal million other chickens, so there's that

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

That's the rub.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

And they pick each other to death in those "free range" areas.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 2 points 11 hours ago

I wish more people knew that information.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 82 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

It's worth noting that supply management is a type of central planning where we centrally determine how much we'll produce and what the price of production will be.

Individual, often small, farmers then produce those eggs and get paid this price. The price and quantities are set so that it's sustainable for farmers to produce. Farmers have the certainty they'll sell their product at a decent price. They aren't at the mercy of the market putting them underwater after they've spent large amounts of capital to produce.

Consumers pay a generally higher price for eggs than the absolute minimum possible, but we also avoid paying much higher prices during shocks and shortages. Our farming sector isn't consolidated by necessity of achieving the lowest price.

We do this with more than eggs.

[–] Brokkr@lemmy.world 42 points 14 hours ago

That sounds like socialism which is bad because it's bad. Look what happened in Canada, they didn't pay animal and worker abusingly low prices and now they don't have insanely high prices. Without causing these situations they are denying large parts of their population high sustained cortisol levels.

This is why we need to maintain our threats of annexation. We must provide them the stress that their government denies them.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Broiler chickens, dairy, and other poultry industries have this.

We should bring it back for crops (return of CWB)?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think Harper sold it to the Saudis. I wouldn't be surprised if there's some provisions that bind Canada to not create a new board. With that said we should absolutely create a new board. Use the crisis. I guess we'll see how much of a Keynesian Carney is. Assuming we elect him of course.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

Harper did more damage to Canada than almost any other PM (selling CWB, signing the FIPPA with China, etc). The fact that he's back here (secretly?) advising PP makes me sick to my stomach.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 96 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Despite the trade war, the U.S. government has one potential solution to help meet demand and keep egg prices from climbing even higher: temporarily increasing egg imports.

I think the world should tacitly embargo the USA for eggs, since Trump doesn't care to treat any trading partner well.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 35 points 15 hours ago

I don't think it should be tacit. It should be explicit - no eggs, no meat, no fish, no natural resource produced within the USA should be imported or exported. And if the US government won't do that, let the rest of the world manage it.

[–] gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com 14 points 14 hours ago

I think it would be more fun if they did it explicitly instead of tacitly.

[–] ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee 9 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

I think we should get Elon to attach rockets to America and launch the whole place into space

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

launch the whole place ~~into space~~ to Mars.

[–] MajorSauce@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

I was thinking of building those border walls they want so much, and then put an airtight lid on it. That should calm them down.

[–] raptir@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 hours ago

Nah just the white house.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Can't, would increase the trade deficit for US and then Trump will rave they're stealing and laughing at the them and use it to start new bullshit. Watch Trump's snake parable, he (now U S) is the snake or scorpion. Helping only hurts the one who shows what they will inevitably label as weakness.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 26 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

driven by cost efficiency,

It's not so cost efficient now is it?
Poor safety standards is a short term strategy.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Have you seen egg producer profits lately? It's great for them to have an opportunity to find out exactly how much consumers are willing to pay for their precious eggs. Super cost efficient, for them.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Profits <> cost efficiency.
Obviously those that have eggs good enough to sell, like small producers, make more money. But those that had to put down all their chickens are more likely to go bankrupt.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Not necessarily. The long-term / short-term focus is a red herring. Without intervention, the system drives people to focus on ever shorter term in order to compete. Because firms can fail due to competition in the short run, before any negative effects of the short term thinking of the competitor have materialized. It's even possible to consolidate the market before "the chickens come home to roost." And then you have the mitigating factors - once you consolidate a critical market, your problems are the society's problem and the society will pay to resolve the issues from your short-term thinking. And then you have the ability to get out of the market before the big problems start showing up. Put all of this together and you can see that the completion for profit in a competitive market can easily drive shorter and shorter term planning without the winning players facing consequences. If it's not profitable to focus on long term planning and the system uses profit to determine success from failure... I think we can't expect individuals or even firms to focus on the long term.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

In theory that could all sound very true.
But the investments need to pay themselves back, and setting up large agricultural production takes time to earn back the investment. So there are limits as to how short term you can invest.

This is probably the lowest denominator disease, where investments become more and more irresponsible, because of lack of regulation that set a lower bar for how irresponsible you can be.

Kind of the same as with the financial crisis almost 20 years ago, that caused an economic slump for 10 years. I wouldn't be surprised if the egg market similarly will take a decade to return to normal.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Right but if investment relies on regulation to be responsible, and removing such regulation leads to potentially higher profits... And if you're able to collect profits on future expected returns today via asset markets... Then wouldn't most try to get rid of such regulation? Most of those people 20 years ago made a killing following deregulation they lobbied for earlier.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

And if you’re able to collect profits on future expected returns today

This is true, but it's 99% a misunderstood perception by the buyers, they generally fail to realize that they are buying in at way higher risk.
Deregulation does not generally promote profits, even when it allows to cut cost.

[–] CouFou@sh.itjust.works 22 points 15 hours ago

Eggs are now the most common thing being seized at the Mexican border too atm.

[–] Aliktren@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

In the annals of future history, ww3 was started because of eggs.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No, Civil War 2 is eggs, WW3 is because the US tried to take over Greenland, Canada, and Panama… perhaps to get more eggs.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago

"These invasions, collectively called the Egg Wars..."

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago

Maybe because Canada isn't a shithole country?

[–] hikuro93@lemmy.ca 14 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

The US in this is the spitting stereotypical image of a man building something, and going "What's this? Don't need manuals. (Throws manual away)", and then wondering why nothing fits, why some parts don't seem to have a place to go, and some other parts are missing.

Why regulations? They serve no purpose. Why does no one import US hormone-riddled meat and heavily synthesized food products? I really wonder.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

In this specific example the regulators are doing their jobs, although a few HHS employees were fired in the early days of the Trump admin there have still been large-scale culls for infected livestock to prevent further spread.

Instead, this is an example of how important antimonopoly laws are and how the USA just straight up ignores it. Canadian egg farms are less than a twentieth the average size, less birds get infected and culled as a result.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 14 hours ago

It would be nice if that was the process. Instead it's the extraction of ever increasing profit that drives this. The big factory farms didn't occur out of not knowing how to farm. They were created as the well established way to decrease costs per unit produced, at least initially. Then large factory farms allow consolidation of production, since they can only be built and operated by large capital, and small farmers don't have it. Then the few owners of these farms are free to set the prices of whatever they produce as high as the market will bear. The owners now also have the leverage to get less regulation, since regulations generally increase costs.

[–] thingAmaBob@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if that’s also the reason pasture raised eggs are cheaper and more available than the other types of eggs where I live. I kid you not, the pasture raised eggs are $3-$4 less than the other types. Free range eggs are $2-$3 cheaper. There are also backyard eggs available for even cheaper.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

There are actually more free range chickens in the USA than in Canada due to the weather.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

That is also the reason why the US has to wash the eggs and chlorinate the chicken.

[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Eggs are so cheap here in Canada that I'm just buying them to throw them away!

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

It's not your fault a cyber truck drove by

[–] funkajunk@lemm.ee 4 points 10 hours ago

Help our neighbours to the south and hurl them at American owned businesses