this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
1271 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

14219 readers
2206 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If we're counting future technology, my money are on iron man style reactor. Don't need to fuze shit, infinite energy.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Except the Ironman style reactor is pure science fiction, whereas hydrogen fusion is real, but still has issues of energy capture, which several groups are working on.

There are two promising avenues, one is a direct physical capture, as in fusion is initiated with huge pistons that are physically moved by the fusion explosion,

And the other cool one is direct magnetic coupling.

I expect both to take off long before the tokamak style does.

But fission power is already here, and much easier to set up. Molten Salt Thorium is also promising. And once some corrosion issues are solved, could power the earth at current levels for the next thousand years.

All while producing an isotope of actinium that produces only alpha radiation. Which is super useful in killing cancer cells.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Well, they suggested fuzing gazoline, not me.

But fission power is already here

Asterisk. A big one. There is no real life prototypes of energy-positive reactors yet. There are several promising pre-prototypes that are almost ready, just need to fix some engineering issues. And it would not be a problem if the whole field wasn't in this state since the sixtieth.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Fission. As in uranium and Thorium.

We've had energy positive fission since the 1950s.