this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
52 points (98.1% liked)
Slop.
505 readers
527 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
you're in the comm for the sludge at the bottom of the barrel. open wide and drink up.
This is water and this is the well. Drink full and descend.
You know how we split the dunk tank into gossip and ~~counterpropaganda~~ slop? What if we split off some of slop's content into a new comm called sludge?
What are we, fucking Trots?
Literally why this comm exists
So stop beating the dead horse then
That's fine, but we really don't need to go over this again
We really do not need to do that.
At least most of the ragebait on the 'bear is basically labeled
anyways megas 4 life
Laughing at someone even more pathetic than me is the only thing that gives my pathetic life joy
Half the site should not be posted into the slop comm. People are posting things into the comm which don't belong in this comm. Report posts in the slop comm which aren't slop. The sidebar says that this comm is for "anonymous reactionary bullshit". If it's a public figure such as a celebrity or politician then it's not slop. Slop is when a non-famous person says or does something which is ignorant, problematic, or bigoted.
thanks for this, I wasn't clear on what goes where and this helps
https://hexbear.net/comment/5630534 This is what CARCOSA said when the comms were launched
My interpretation is that slop is for bad things said or done by nonfamous people, gossip is for bad things said by a famous person such as a celebrity or politician. If a government enacts a reactionary policy or law, I put that in news. When a government does anything, it's news comm, because it's material action that impacts people's lives. If a politician does something reactionary, it could be news or could be gossip or even politics comm, depending on the material impact of the action or thing said.
My philosophy is that the comm should be chosen by the amount of material impact behind the subject. It annoys me a lot when an impactful news story gets posted in the slop comm.
What makes this difficult is a few things in my experience.
Ideally, you would create as few comms as needed covering the broadest strokes possible, and delineate them with tags, creating a hierarchy of comms and tags.
News could embody all types of content, for example.
Posts should be allowed to have any number of tags, and honestly, I don't see why there should be much difference between a tag and a comm... There should be tags that are site wide, like NSFW, which would be a tag that is configured to blur its contents, or marked as a "content warning" tag.
Honestly I would love this. Replace comms with tags (which side note: should work with mastodon tags), posts can be in as many tags as possible, and those tags should be editable after posting, including my moderators.
I think the main issue would be that currently moderators are per-comnunity, and having moderators per-tag just feels weird.
Additionally, the blurring of content could be done like bluesky labelers, where you can specify that certain tags should make content fully hidden, blurred, or fully visible.
Yeah, the only big issue with replacing Comms with Tags is that Communities can be extremely tailored to a very specific niche thanks to the silo effect and having attached mods. This only works when the network effect is powerful, like with Reddit, where you have millions of users, though. I don't see Tags really allowing for that level of community building ultimately.
Simply adding Tags (global tags and local community tags) would go a long way in condensing the number of communities, which raises the level of engagement of communities.