view the rest of the comments
the_dunk_tank
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
It's been researched that showing people contradicting evidence usually doesn't change their mind from their initial opinion
People believe certain things because they're predisposed to believe them
If you want to convince these people otherwise, you have to work on their racism and Western chauvinism
Which is why you don't present it as contradictory, you package it in a manner libs are used to receiving it. There are many ways in which we unconsciously judge something as truthful. Storytelling is basically the art of lying in a manner that is congruent to a person's worldview. That's what the Call to Adventure/Refusal of the Hero's Journey is after all, it's introducing a world that is familiar to the story's consumer (whether it conforms to reality is irrelevant, what matters is it conforms to what the consumer is expecting) and then whisking them away to a fantastical world in a congruent manner where you no longer have to follow the rules of the "real" world. There are many ways, however, to appeal to the consumers familiarity, some times it's tropes, some times it's aesthetics, the point is to mimic the FEEL while feeding them truthful information.
I mean really, you're here, I know damn well you've seen libs flip their views on a dime simply because corporate media shifted the narrative. Some people they lose, but most people go right along with it. Because the information is not what they're judging, it's the packaging. The news media are the trusted source through years of repetition and social proof, the information glides right in the brain holes as long as their feelings towards the news media remains untarnished.
What's the line? Libs only understand tone, not words? Same principle. It's about ticking off enough of their boxes of expectation that they never have a reason to question what they're being told in the first place.