this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
612 points (97.4% liked)

Not The Onion

16937 readers
1220 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TwistedCister@lemm.ee 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Why should the poor subsidize their income with our labor?

Edit for clarity: If the rich do not want to subsidize basic human rights then the poor should not subsidize the bank accounts of the wealthy.

I’m fucking poor bro. I’m not gonna ever be on team money.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think we should be subsidizing people's poor reading comprehension.

Why should the poor subsidize their income with our labor?

the poor ... our = us
their = the rich

This commenter was asking for someone to try and justify why we (the working class) should have our labor contribute to the income of people whose existence is based on exploiting others. A perfectly reasonable question.

[–] TwistedCister@lemm.ee 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I could have used clearer language. It was just a misunderstanding.

Homie came to bat for the working man straight up. I can’t fault that ever.

[–] Transtronaut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

Turns out you're so pro-poor, even your grammar is poor. :P

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because they didn't choose to be born poor and probably work harder than you. Any other questions?

[–] TwistedCister@lemm.ee 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t think my vibe came through. It’s a response to the friend you mentioned who doesn’t want to pay for healthcare.

“Why should we pay for their healthcare?”

Because it’s far more humane than the poor subsidizing the bank accounts of the mega rich with our labor and getting as little as possible in return.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, I definitely missed it. Thought you meant why are the poor getting things for "our labor"

I'm also not the one who mentioned the friend, but that's unimportant

[–] TwistedCister@lemm.ee 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I’m also not totally sober. Love you all.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Me neither, have had a couple gins and tonic. Decided to try raspberry gin with lemon bitter tonic. Awesome

[–] krawutzikaputzi@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

Not on topic, just wanted to tell you that was one of the nicest conservations I've red online. Good on you for being so understanding and cute.

And coming from a country with universal healthcare it should totally be a human right everywhere. I hope one day the working class in the USA will win!

their income

whose income? the rich friend's income? or the people needing healthcare?

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

Sadly about 40-50% of the population are MAGA, which believe they are all temporarily inconvenienced billionaires. Any day now that MAGA person is going to get lots of money (probably the lottery) and they dont want the pay all those taxes ... so they sit in their trailer park with their MAGA hat and "Let's Go Brandon" bumper sticker just waiting to go vote how the billionaires of "team money" tell them to.