357
submitted 1 year ago by Fissionami@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jackmarxist@hexbear.net 87 points 1 year ago

4.5 Million but yeah, glad that the USA and the UK got sanctioned after leading such a genocidal war. This restores my faith in the rules based order.

[-] astral_avocado@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

Can we please stop overusing the word genocide

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 57 points 1 year ago

Sorry, you're right. In the absence of specific genocidal intent, the US and UK are only guilty of crimes against humanity, the crime of aggression, and various sundry war crimes.

[-] astral_avocado@programming.dev -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, correct. Now Saddam Hussein on the other hand..

Edit: oh you're one of the hexbear people, jesus you people are insufferable

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago

I agree with you and you resort to whataboutism in response. Somehow I'm the insufferable one?

Yikes.

[-] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Literally justifying the Iraq war while acting like we're the assholes here, right

[-] astral_avocado@programming.dev -2 points 1 year ago

Saddam Hussein didn't literally genocide kurdish people? Not saying that justifies a country halfway across the world to brutally occupy them, but it's not like that didn't happen.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Holy fucking shit.

After hand wringing the word in context of the US killing millions of people.

And we're insufferable.

[-] astral_avocado@programming.dev -5 points 1 year ago

In the former instance there was an actual concerted effort to specifically murder people of a certain minority. In the latter there was a misguided attempt to squash an insurgency and build a new government at all costs. This is documented history and I can only assume you've been drooling on some communist furry subs for the past decade and just left adolescence. You can't just change word's definitions for your own childish deranged goals.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The fucking nerve of you to invoke the idea of 'documented history' when you're as ignorant as a fucking toddler about that very history is absolutely fucking infuriating. And for someone who puts so much goddamned effort into your affectation of intelligence you have absolutely no fucking critical thinking. The US, this hapless buffoon of a country. Accidentally murdering several million people over the course of three decades. Whoopsie! I deleted the only pharmaceutical factory in the region. D'oh! I bombed a baby food factory and all the civilian power and water infrastructure! How does this keep happening??

And the fucking chauvinism. It's genocide when our enemy uses chemical weapons during wartime in an area with a lot of insurgent fighting (compare us killing another several million people in Vietnam with our own chemical weapons for the exact same reasons except deliberately targeting their food supply but that's not considered a genocide somehow). They killed about 3k people but they did it with animal bloodlust. But we're good. We killed A THOUSAND TIMES THAT MANY PEOPLE but with good intentions. Promise.

People like you are mathematical proof that the west needs to be fucking destroyed.

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Honestly writing off America's involvement in the Iraq war as just "misguided" has me fucking FUMING.

[-] DoiDoi@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

whoopsies i did yet another imperialism killing millions in the process

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Awwww poor Bush and his administration, just poor misguided rubes with no ill intent at all. :(

[-] astral_avocado@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago
[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Then why did you use the word misguided

[-] Flaps@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You see the double standard you're using here, right? Awful things done by natos geopolitical enemies are genocides, war crimes,... Yet when nato does it it's at most a misguided atempt at doing the right thing?

[-] Schooner@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 year ago

Yeah killing millions of people was totally worth getting one man!

Now let's bomb Washington DC to rubble and kill your family so we can get to Bush, the even bigger war criminal.

[-] astral_avocado@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago

Did I say I think we should have invaded Iraq and Afghanistan?

[-] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

Nah you just pearl clutched when we called Western Powers bad names.

I'm loosely in favor of restricting the use of the word genocide to when it's definitionally appropriate myself, but that's in the context of effective communication and clarity. So long as "genocide" is going to be used exclusively to refer to US State Department desginated enemies only, then it's perfectly reasonable to liken the US/France/UK's horrific foreign interventions genocide as well. Western interventions, both formal and clandestine, have killed many more than anyone else those imperialist fucks have accused of the word, so in the interest of showing just how absurd their usage is yes, we should and can call Western powers genocidal too.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 1 year ago

Also you: https://lemmygrad.ml/comment/1081955

When you say it like that sure, except they also deny the Uyghur genocide and ignore the fact that China has their internet walled off and heavily censored/policed.

Basically they’re so pro-communism that they looped back around and are now pro-fascists and drink the Kool aid. Not to mention the fact that China is only communist in name lol

[-] astral_avocado@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes this is me, thank you for advertising my accurate comment. China is indeed targeting and concentrating minorities into camps. Words have meanings.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Does not seem like words have meanings. All the nuance in your tank is reserved for the constant America-led warmongering in the middle east with a death toll in millions, many more displaced, and known torture sites like Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and god known how many more black sites. Meanwhile the Uyghur are unequivocally being genocided despite ZERO CONFIRMED CASUALTIES four years into the news cycle. So your litmus test for genocide seems to be US foreign policy despite the emphasis on words having meaning.

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

astral_avacado said elsewhere that the Iraq Invasion was just "misguided" so its definitely a case of us-foreign-policy with how they decide what is and isn't a genocide.

[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

Calling that genocide is holocaust denial.

Stop hiding behind pathetic labels, you are in bed with fascists.

[-] Willer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

lets call it unsolicited special underage child pregnancy operation

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
357 points (89.6% liked)

World News

32043 readers
676 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS