this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025

118 points (99.2% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14381 readers

510 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net

Thordros@hexbear.net

JustSo@hexbear.net

118

Reuters: Meta’s AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual’ chats with kids (CW: grooming) (hexbear.net)

submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by ProgAimerGirl@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

warning: this article is a psychic damage engine. don't engage if it's gonna hurt you: Reuters

link to a bluesky thread on the article: link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Sure, but according to everyone I’m somehow a sick pervert because I use Wikipedia. Wikipedia gets censored but clankerfucking is a-ok and family friendly.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 18 points 9 months ago

Full disclosure I sometimes use perchance to gen up some titillating pics of ADULT women when I'm feeling it. It makes no sense because most AI stuff is ridiculously strict about being SFW to appease shareholders, but here's Zucc saying "oh yeah btw our bot is sexting with children." WHY