this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
117 points (99.2% liked)

Climate

8654 readers
222 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
117
Germany's coal exit quietly progressing, likely completed by 2032 – researcher (www.cleanenergywire.org)
submitted 1 day ago by Sepia@mander.xyz to c/climate@slrpnk.net
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/52096709

Germany's coal phase-out is on track to happen through market forces well before the legal 2038 deadline, regardless of current energy market turbulence, says Hauke Hermann, a researcher at the Institute of Applied Ecology (Öko-Institut). Carbon price trends make an exit as early as 2031 or 2032 likely, Hermann told Clean Energy Wire. Refiring old coal plants in response to the Iran war's energy market shock to cut power costs would distort investment signals and is unlikely to happen in practice, he added.

Soaring energy prices have triggered calls for slowing Germany’s coal exit. The country’s coal exit law, agreed in 2020, provides for the step-by-step decommissioning of coal power plants. It also stipulates that coal-fired power generation must cease by 2038 at the very latest. Germany's western coal region aims for an earlier phase-out by 2030, but delays in building new gas-fired power plants as a backup for renewables make meeting this earlier deadline increasingly unlikely.

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Evolushan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Germany is very much opposed to nuclear, but when it needs it, it has no problems with importing it? That's a bit hypocritical and not really self sufficient, isn't it. Besides it might happen there is dr~~a~~ought plus/or huge energy demand and France won't be able to export energy.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A bit hypocritical to think nuclear could prevent that when it takes 15 years under optimal conditions to build a reactor.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Nuclear could prevent that, but Germany closed even their functional NPPs, let alone planned new ones when it should. How come France emissions are incredibly low and state is self sufficient, even exports a lot...

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Germany closed half a century old plants that were over or close to their maximum design lifespan.

France is still having Russia of all places process a large part of the needed uranium 🙄 And the nuclear power plants are causing huge debts for the operators.