this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
82 points (98.8% liked)

News

37703 readers
1780 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That proportionally hits poor and middle class people harder than rich people.

[–] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They literally only set them up in the poor areas in town and not where the rich run red lights continuously.

[–] Naich@piefed.world -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It hits people who go through red lights the hardest. No one is forcing anyone to run a red light.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

And of those, the punishment is inversely proportional to their income.

[–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Shit happens and this disproportionally punishes poor people harder.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Shit happens? Really? Running a red light at an intersection is shit happens?

You know you convinced me that this poor rich argument is stupid. Run a red light get ticket, don't run a red light don't get a ticket.

I don't recall running more lights depending on my wealth because I don't like to kill people.

The shit that shouldn't happen is not auditing any company running these things.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The problem with that logic is it’s already been demonstrated that it can be configured for profit rather than safety. We have no reason to trust these and every reason to expect that any ticket is capricious, possibly invalid, and a long after the fact enforcement so you won’t even be able to remember if you did it

It will not make anyone safer, just reduce trust in law enforcement even more, drive profit to some connected company, and be an unreasonable driving tax that will mostly hit those who can least afford it.

Speaking as someone who

  • walks a lot and has had too many close calls from drivers running red lights
  • usually stops gradually and in plenty of time for traffic lights, yet has had too many close calls from drivers behind me speeding up
  • has had tickets by mail when my ez -pass doesn’t read ….. that I haven’t gotten until months later when I can no longer remember what I did, how to fix it, or if I should appeal. And that has sometimes come with late fees from the beginning because they took too long to track me down (in the house where I’ve lived for 20 years)
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I was really annoyed with the persons "shit happens" comment. Ok fuck it, shit happens, so do nothing is the wrong answer, and frankly I do not want to get T-boned in an intersection and I am not really concerned if the rich or poor are doing it. Fuck them both if they run red lights.

However, cameras do in fact make it safer. Statistics and studies have shown you have about a 20 percent reduction in side crashes, and of those you have about a 29 reduction in injuries. There also is a side effect where a camera at one light actually causes other intersections to be safer as people are not sure if there are cameras there.

So we know it improves safety.

We also know that several states had to pass additional laws or restrictions because vendors AND cities and counties were trying to force revenue by shortening the yellow light duration. So I can agree with you there, accountability matters.

Yet in two places, cities simply increased the yellow duration, which ALSO improved safety, and nearly as much. I think California passed a law to increase all yellows by another second.

So what is the take away: people are shitty. Poor people, government workers, vendors, rich people, they all have people that suck. I don't want to be in an accident. I really don't care what it takes, but I don't even know where to begin when I am driving in America and realize they a huge portion are rude dipshit morons who only seem to care about themselves. How can the society even function when they just don't care?