Image credit to Kevin Gill on Wikimedia Commons
The planet Venus is the easiest of the planets to spot with the naked eye from here on earth. Due to her high albedo and proximity to the sun she will appear at dusk, heralding the appearance of the stars before disappearing through the night, only to return at dawn as the stars fade into the morning light.
She may also harbor life.
Conditions on her surface are rightly described as "hellish". The high temperatures, pressures, intense volcanism and presence of chemicals such as sulfuric acid are notorious for "killing" probes in a matter of minutes. Earthlings would probably not fare much better.
Phosphine is a gas produced by either volcanic or biological processes. In 2020, phosphine was detected in the upper atmosphere of Venus in concentrations higher than what could be accounted for by volcanic processes alone. Now, there have been published studies attempting to disprove these observations but, despite what the shitheads at Wikipedia say, the presence of phosphine has been validated by repeat observations.
This discovery has lead to some renewed interest in...
Fuck it, its not that serious, I can write this like I'm posting on hexbear, because I'm posting on hexbear.
Look at this picture okay?

Thats her, thats Venus, thats what she actually looks like to the naked eye. If you stood before her, in all her terror and glory, this is what you would see (more or less). Virtually every other picture you have ever seen of Venus has been some kind of false color image, usually in the ultraviolet spectrum, maybe in the infrared or really high or low ends of the visible spectrum with the contrast jacked way, way up.

This is an image of Venus, taken by Mariner 10, in the ultraviolet range.
The dark lines are areas where UV light is being absorbed. We don't know whats doing that. We call it the "unknown ultraviolet absorber" and we don't really know what it is. We have been staring at this thing for nearly a century and we don't know what it is. Its prevalent enough to impact Venus's weather cycle, its intensity waxes and wanes over time, it moves around, and best guesses have it absorbing about 50% of all UV light hitting Venus.
And we have no idea what it is.
The discovery of phosphine has lead to a reexamination of old data and... okay here's the arxiv link and here's the direct link to the pdf. If you have gotten this far and can parse astrobiological scientific journal articles you should read this because the argument it makes is rock-solid and very, very thoroughly detailed. If that's not your jam here's a youtube link to a lecture by Astrobiology rockstar Sara Seager about astrobiological study on Venus, it covers most of the same content.
Basically, there is a whole lot of really specific, really weird things going on in the atmosphere of Venus. No feasible combination of abiotic factors are able to form a model that explains all of them. Carl Sagan once proposed that the Unknown UV Absorber was microbial in nature and that seems to get more and more likely every day.
We won't know for sure until we get some in-situ studies going on. Thankfully there are a handful on the way, including one planning on launching either this or next year. Its not sexy, basically a probe will fall through the atmosphere and use a laser to check for organic molecules, but its going to be the first of many. And its lead by Sara Seager, the aformentioned astrobio rockstar.
I just think about this a lot. We may have been looking at life, elsewhere in the universe, since before we were even human.
and it will have been on Venus, marscucks btfo lmao
Join our public Matrix server!
https://rentry.co/tracha#tracha-rooms
As a reminder, please do not discuss current struggle sessions in the mega. We want this to be a little oasis for all of us and the best way to do that is not to feed into existing conflict on the site.
Also, be sure to properly give content warnings and put sensitive subjects behind proper spoiler tags. It's for the mental health of not just your comrades, but yourself as well.
Here is a screenshot of where to find the spoiler button.
spoiler
It kind of drives me insane when even trans women buy into the line "trans woman of a certain age need to get their PSA screening". (prostate blood test for cancer)
Because actually we don't know that. And doing a screening test is not a neutral action.
I worked in public health a lifetime ago, and for a while there was a real heavy debate on whether we stopped doing PSA screening on cis men. Because the data was showing it was actually hurting more people than it saved, due to false positive and unnecessary invasive procedures. Now the test got better and MRIs meant follow-up tests could be less invasive (than needle biopsy), but for a while it was a thing.
So like everything in trans medicine it's not been studied enough and simply needs to be. Given trans women actually actively do the treatment for prostate cancer (testosterone blocking), my gut is we'd be more like to have false positive than true positive. But I also know we have like zero studies on this topic.
(screening is also different to a diagnostic test if you have symptoms).
I think there's a predilection to prefer overtesting vs. undertesting, even if it leads to worse outcomes statistically, because medical professionals not catching something feels like such a betrayal. False positives otoh kinda feel like the cost of doing business?
Cypro is the traditional treatment for prostate cancer, but there are forms that are resistant to T blockers. Only ones I saw were when it was very well developed and grown quite a bit not like something you randomly pick up. Prostate cancer is T driven so if youre on blockers or you had an orchie, the chances of developing it should more or less be zero I suppose. If you had some cancer brewing and it wasnt resistant to T deprivation... well if you take HRT or get an orchie you already were doing the standard treatment. I suppose its possible for someone who had it in full bloom to transition past when deprivation would be useful? But that seems very very niche and presumably youd have been screened once pre anything (pre egg crack probably).
Oh definitely a trans woman or a cis man with T could always get a non testosterone driven prostate cancer. Just like there's non hormonal breast cancer.
It's just whether large scale asymptomatic screening for that is actually cost effective, useful and not outright harmful, given the overwhelming majority is testosterone driven. If someone had symptoms, having tests would still be indicated.
But ultimately the answer is there needs to be more studies into trans health. There simply is no data. And everyone wants to apply either set of cis guidelines to trans people, when we should have our own science driven ones.
The one that gets me is that there is studies on men with MS getting testosterone being beneficial. But if youre a trans man with MS they make you stop taking T. Wild.
Trans individuals don't even get the same level of basic healthcare as cis people but to some we're the source of all evil and taking over the world.
Wish we were.
Cis people are evil :very-smart:
They'll take any opportunity to blame HRT.
Yeah that always seemed like a weird recommendation to me, considering our hrt.